• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Eileen Derbyshire
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
hachiman
13-11-2016
She's not coming back.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...e-cast-member/
Alexvnder
13-11-2016
I really hope the actress does return to give Emily a lovely departure story if this is true!

I'd like a few weeks of her helping out other characters around her with their problems as she does before peacefully passing away or something!

If they do go down the passing away route, I do hope she receives a more respectful send off than Betty and Deirdre, both of which were sadly disappointing
Scorpio2
13-11-2016
If she doesn't return it will be an awful exit for a character who first appeared over 50 years ago.
vaslav37
13-11-2016
A Corrie Legend- Happy retirement to her.
hello.member
13-11-2016
Think we all knew it was coming.
Jimmy Connors
13-11-2016
This confirms what I think we already suspected.

Seems she left on her own terms - as befitting a very private lady.
Rich Tea.
13-11-2016
Sensible lady. She knows that the show she was once on is not the same thing anymore. It's called Coronation Street only in name now. It bears no relationship in quality of writing or acting to anything it once was, even not that many years ago. I've stopped watching it about 2 months ago after having watched since the early 80's. Real life is now more interesting than watching poor, unrealistic scripts being played out by poor and under rehearsed actors.

Eileen Derbyshire you are well rid. You were too classy for the tripe they now serve up.
KornerKabin
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by Rich Tea.:
“Sensible lady. She knows that the show she was once on is not the same thing anymore. It's called Coronation Street only in name now. It bears no relationship in quality of writing or acting to anything it once was, even not that many years ago. I've stopped watching it about 2 months ago after having watched since the early 80's. Real life is now more interesting than watching poor, unrealistic scripts being played out by poor and under rehearsed actors.

Eileen Derbyshire you are well rid. You were too classy for the tripe they now serve up.”

Beautifully sad post that perfectly describes the sorry shell of a show that Coronation Street now is. Eileen Derbyshire has made the right decision and I applaud her for doing it with dignity and respect, which is exactly what we'd expect from her.

That's not to say that I'm happy. She is a huge loss, having been with the show since episode 15 Emily and Eileen are as integral as Ken Barlow. Sending her off to Peru was a laughably embarrassing move but it perfectly sums up the show that Corrie has become. Emily could easily have gone off to spend time with Mavis in the Lakes, but Corrie had to go for the outlandish and unbelievable option. Naturally.

Congratulations on your retirement Eileen, you've more than earned it.
GracieL
13-11-2016
A pity about the awful exit Corrie gave her, I mean hiking in Peru, really? It might have worked 20 years ago but it seems a bit unrealistic now given her age.

I hope Eileen has a wonderful retirement, she's well and truly deserved it.
soap-lea
13-11-2016
Until Corrie confirm she is definitely retiring I just refuse to believe it ☹️

I do hope tho that Eileen is enjoying her time off and if it is retirement that she has a happy one for many years but I would love her to return.

55 years is a stellar achievement
Janet Plank
13-11-2016
Wishing Eileen Derbyshiure a very happy and long retirement. thankyou for all the years of pleasure you gave us on TV.
Les Corker
13-11-2016
Will they kill her off?
Ten_Ben
13-11-2016
The longer Emily stays in Peru the more nonsensical it becomes.
Adrian_Ward1
13-11-2016
Good luck to her
boogie woogie
13-11-2016
Given Emily's age, it would be realistic if they were to kill her off. I think a phone call or a letter saying that she's simply staying in Peru would feel very underwhelming. She's been a real stalwart and deserves a fitting send-off.
KornerKabin
13-11-2016
The thing is, they could easily have sent her off to stay with Mavis in the Lakes which would've been much easier for viewers to believe and far easier to explain in the long run. We could also have had the likes of Rita and Norris going off to visit Emily and Mavis for the day or a weekend here and there.

Then, when Emily doesn't return, it can be easily explained by saying that she wants to settle down in the countryside. Easy.

Corrie seems to like to simplify what should be complex stories and then complicate the easy ones ...
Joe_H11
13-11-2016
It's the sun newspaper...

But if it's true it's very sad, is she still under contract? Is she not?

I do think she should return for a few weeks then pass away at home with Norris, Rita ect around her maybe
KornerKabin
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by Joe_H11:
“It's the sun newspaper...

But if it's true it's very sad, is she still under contract? Is she not?

I do think she should return for a few weeks then pass away at home with Norris, Rita ect around her maybe”

I believe (and I stress, believe not know for a fact) that Eileen Derbyshire was among some of the established cast members who moved to episode-only contracts a number of years ago. That obviously means that she could still be under contract with ITV but doesn't have a fixed number of hours/episodes that she needs to work.

If that makes sense ...
James J
13-11-2016
Seems a very presumptive article but I do doubt she'll return. She'll be missed!
Joe_H11
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by KornerKabin:
“I believe (and I stress, believe not know for a fact) that Eileen Derbyshire was among some of the established cast members who moved to episode-only contracts a number of years ago. That obviously means that she could still be under contract with ITV but doesn't have a fixed number of hours/episodes that she needs to work.

If that makes sense ...”

Right yeah, so she only gets paid for what she works and she's not contacted like 45 hours a week ect.

Who else is on one of those?
KornerKabin
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by Joe_H11:
“Right yeah, so she only gets paid for what she works and she's not contacted like 45 hours a week ect.

Who else is on one of those?”

The only other actors who were on that type of contract were Betty Driver (Betty) and Bev Callard (Liz).

I think it was only applied to the 'secondary' established cast because ITV were paying them too much for doing relatively little.
Les Corker
13-11-2016
It's been denied
boogie woogie
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by Les Corker:
“It's been denied”

Source?
callumfreeman
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by boogie woogie:
“Source?”

http://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/coro...aving-rumours/
soap-lea
13-11-2016
Originally Posted by callumfreeman:
“http://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/coro...aving-rumours/”

You are a star Callum.

<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map