|
||||||||
The new itv two show thoughts |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
I'm actually enjoying it people are so quick to judge it's only the 2nd bloody episode I think there doing a good job.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East London
Posts: 9,496
|
Loose Women had the right idea. They got rid of Pattison. Now she's been inflicted on us again.
Will they take notice that the viewers can't stand her. Why don't they realise all reality people have zero talent? |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
|
Quote:
Loose Women had the right idea. They got rid of Pattison. Now she's been inflicted on us again.
Will they take notice that the viewers can't stand her. Why don't they realise all reality people have zero talent? |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 5,615
|
Half watching for the first time tonight, and ain't it bloody awful. Stacey can't get her words out, Vicky's a rambling mess and Joe is far from presenting quality. Chris isn't too bad, definitely best of the lot.
Personally think just the boys as a presenting duo would be better, the four of them is too much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East London
Posts: 9,496
|
Quote:
She quit herself to be fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,479
|
They can't add fake laughter to it, like ITV normally to to such shows but they seem to have persuaded the crew to laugh at just about anything anyone says, funny or not.
How pathetic is that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 594
|
Watched the first half-hour again - it did seem calmer.
From what I saw, let Chris + Brooke present with Joe doing the trials. Stacey and Vicky just aren't up to it, the jump from reality TV to presenting is too big in their case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,089
|
Quote:
Stacey and Vicky just aren't up to it, the jump from reality TV to presenting is too big in their case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,381
|
Its a hot mess
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 502
|
Quote:
Its a hot mess
I watched it all on night one and I could make out a word that any of them were saying. I was grateful for Andi Peters and Brooke. I tried again last night and managed about 10 minutes. Vicky seemed quieter as if she had been told to shut up but it was still just a shambles. They do not need that many presenters. Won't be watching again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 156
|
To be fair, Vicky was much better tonight, not as wired and hyper and over-exaggerating her Geordie accent. Mind you, I still find her irritating. I'm sorry, cos I'm sure she's trying her best and is learning, after all. When I work out why she irritates me, I'll get back. 😀
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,527
|
how does Joe Swash get on telly, if the homeless at Charing Cross were as rough as him there'd be national protests ?
![]() he makes me ashamed to be from North London and I am as rough as old boots myself, bring back Arthur Mullard
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
how does Joe Swash get on telly, if the homeless at Charing Cross were as rough as him there'd be national protests ?
![]() he makes me ashamed to be from North London and I am as rough as old boots myself, bring back Arthur Mullard ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,464
|
Quote:
To be fair, Vicky was much better tonight, not as wired and hyper and over-exaggerating her Geordie accent. Mind you, I still find her irritating. I'm sorry, cos I'm sure she's trying her best and is learning, after all. When I work out why she irritates me, I'll get back. 😀
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: katmandoodieland
Posts: 50,732
|
I have not watched it yet as I cant stand any of them that present it
they all just sound so bloody thick and I do hope everyone doesnt think that up here we are all like Vicky P |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,525
|
It's absolutely terrible with the 4 of them. Can't stand any of them but I really don't see why one show needs 4 'presenters' if that's what you can call them. It's a mess. Stacey and Vicky are diabolical and annoying, Joe is a creep and that other bloke I have no idea who he is. I used to like it way back when with Tara Palmer Tompkinson. She was as mad as a box of frogs but at least she was funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,038
|
[quote=Jill_Fan;84575001]It's absolutely terrible with the 4 of them. Can't stand any of them but I really don't see why one show needs 4 'presenters' if that's what you can call them. It's a mess. Stacey and Vicky are diabolical and annoying, Joe is a creep and that other bloke I have no idea who he is. I used to like it way back when with Tara Palmer Tompkinson. She was as mad as a box of frogs but at least she was funny.[/QUOTE
I assume ITV will keep it going for this series but I cant see that they will bring them back next year. I usually watch but when I heard that Vicky and Stacey were going to be on it, Ive given it a miss and based on what has been said on here, I'm glad I have. If ITV decided to change it quickly, I would probably give it a go but not whilst Vicky and Stacey are on it. Joe I can just about stand when there is someone decent in charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Highlands
Posts: 8,009
|
Quote:
Get rid of the Gang of four and let Brooke cut he teeth presenting the show , she seems must more polished.
I am the only one that remembers all the "Laura is shite" threads when she started? Now it's "Bring back Laura!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 2,908
|
Haven't watched it but missing Laura Whitmore already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,527
|
it was awful when Laura was on it too, but it's ITV2, you expect utter shite and hope for just below average
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 250
|
What I can't stand is their gleaming white teeth! It looks so unnatural.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,464
|
[quote=hansue;84575063] Quote:
It's absolutely terrible with the 4 of them. Can't stand any of them but I really don't see why one show needs 4 'presenters' if that's what you can call them. It's a mess. Stacey and Vicky are diabolical and annoying, Joe is a creep and that other bloke I have no idea who he is. I used to like it way back when with Tara Palmer Tompkinson. She was as mad as a box of frogs but at least she was funny.[/QUOTE
I assume ITV will keep it going for this series but I cant see that they will bring them back next year. I usually watch but when I heard that Vicky and Stacey were going to be on it, Ive given it a miss and based on what has been said on here, I'm glad I have. If ITV decided to change it quickly, I would probably give it a go but not whilst Vicky and Stacey are on it. Joe I can just about stand when there is someone decent in charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,038
|
[quote=fredster;84577603] Quote:
The producers love pattinson, she won last year because she was on screen all the time. The others hardly featured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7,582
|
I miss laura.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,015
|
It's amateur hour. I have yet to make it through a full show.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43.




