DS Forums

 
 

Larries and other tinhats


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2016, 02:41
Zarla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,886
The Larries are always expecting two events - 'The Coming Out' and 'The Denial'. To this recently they've added 'The Betrayal', which will happen when Louis turns round and says he's not signed with Simon after all, he's gone with another record company.

It's ironic that Louis is the one they choose to stan obsessively when he is the one closest to Simon. Simon said in his interview with The Sun today that he 'loved' Louis and the Larries have gone nuclear.
Zarla is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 06-12-2016, 11:01
minxymoo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: being Blue with El Nino Torres
Posts: 11,910
I thought Ronaldo's boyfriend was supposed to be some Moroccan wrestler?
I thought he was a lifeguard-pool attendant.or is this a new one ?
minxymoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 12:51
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
The Larries are always expecting two events - 'The Coming Out' and 'The Denial'. To this recently they've added 'The Betrayal', which will happen when Louis turns round and says he's not signed with Simon after all, he's gone with another record company.

It's ironic that Louis is the one they choose to stan obsessively when he is the one closest to Simon. Simon said in his interview with The Sun today that he 'loved' Louis and the Larries have gone nuclear.
The denial? Are they still expecting Tomlinson to deny Freddie is his child? Haven't they heard of in utero DNA testing? No way would a multimillionaire simply accept paternity on the girl's say so. It is also law in California that a man unmarried to the mother of his child, has to confirm paternity before parenting options and access can be arranged. I thought some of these larries were lawyers?
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 14:02
Gardena
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 564
The denial? Are they still expecting Tomlinson to deny Freddie is his child? Haven't they heard of in utero DNA testing? No way would a multimillionaire simply accept paternity on the girl's say so. It is also law in California that a man unmarried to the mother of his child, has to confirm paternity before parenting options and access can be arranged. I thought some of these larries were lawyers?
There is the theory that babygate2.0 (aka Liam and Cheryl's pregnancy) was created to distract so the original babygate could be wrapped up easily .
Gardena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 14:05
Zarla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,886
They are still expecting that lol. They have great hopes for Louis' 25th birthday, for 2017 and then for the rest of the 21st century. The reality probably is that he had the paternity test in utero as you say and then decided to declare paternity to the nation, a possibly misguided move as if he'd stayed quiet the Larries would never have suspected and would have left Briana alone. His own father abandoned him at birth so maybe he was trying to make a better job of it.

One of them is called lawyerlarrie, but her favourite saying is 'the law is irrelevant' and that people don't get prosecuted for stuff like birth certificate fraud unless someone 'presses charges'. She seems never to have heard of the state pressing charges.
Zarla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 15:08
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
They are still expecting that lol. They have great hopes for Louis' 25th birthday, for 2017 and then for the rest of the 21st century. The reality probably is that he had the paternity test in utero as you say and then decided to declare paternity to the nation, a possibly misguided move as if he'd stayed quiet the Larries would never have suspected and would have left Briana alone. His own father abandoned him at birth so maybe he was trying to make a better job of it.

One of them is called lawyerlarrie, but her favourite saying is 'the law is irrelevant' and that people don't get prosecuted for stuff like birth certificate fraud unless someone 'presses charges'. She seems never to have heard of the state pressing charges.
Birth certificate fraud is a criminal offence. You don't need someone to press charges! I have a Law degree from 20 years ago. I didn't go into Law. Some of my friends did Law degrees and have done nothing law related at all ever since. They still call themselves Lawyers because they once studied it. I doubt the Larries actually are practicing lawyers, because frankly, where do they find the time?

Margot Robbie seems to have found herself the victim of some ridiculous shopping nonsense. She posted a picture of herself missing her long term partner, Tom Ackerly and got reams and reams of abuse from people who ship jer with Jared Leto. Because of a film he was hardly in! Someone posted a link to the boyfriends instagram as well, so no doubt hes getting a ton of abuse too now. I really can't understand how these people dont realise that abusing someones partner on their own instagram account is crossing a line!
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 17:51
Agent Krycek
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stalking David and Neal
Posts: 38,045
There is the theory that babygate2.0 (aka Liam and Cheryl's pregnancy) was created to distract so the original babygate could be wrapped up easily .
Sooooo, will there be a babygate 3.0 to distract from Liam and Cheryl after babygate1.0 is resolved, and the babygate4.0 to distract from 3.0 etc, etc until the world is entirely populated by fake baby offspring of 1D and tin hats
Agent Krycek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 18:36
FingersAndToes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,486
There is the theory that babygate2.0 (aka Liam and Cheryl's pregnancy) was created to distract so the original babygate could be wrapped up easily .
Of course Cheryl has nothing better to do with her time, but wear a fake baby bump when out and about. This clever PR plan will not back fire on her when it's revealed, thst it wasn't real after all. And all this to cover up another fake baby. Makes so much sense. I see the truth now.
FingersAndToes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 20:40
Zarla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,886
Sooooo, will there be a babygate 3.0 to distract from Liam and Cheryl after babygate1.0 is resolved, and the babygate4.0 to distract from 3.0 etc, etc until the world is entirely populated by fake baby offspring of 1D and tin hats
Lol, the Larries stance is that the boys are all millennials, who never have kids in their early 20s, so the babies must be fake. They have a 2+2=553 thing going on. It'd be hilarious if someone came forward with a four year old and sold a story about the kid being Harry's.
Zarla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 22:51
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
Lol, the Larries stance is that the boys are all millennials, who never have kids in their early 20s, so the babies must be fake. They have a 2+2=553 thing going on. It'd be hilarious if someone came forward with a four year old and sold a story about the kid being Harry's.
I must admit, I do wonder why these young pop stars seem to want to tie themselves down so young, from the babies to the Little Mix engagements, but maybe their lives are so abnormal, they just crave a bit of normality and stability. It hasn't worked that way with the 2 little mix girls that got engaged, but it might be why they did it. Or maybe engagements mean something different now, not necessarily a promise of marriage but a show of commitment in itself, which of course it isn't!
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2016, 23:03
minxymoo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: being Blue with El Nino Torres
Posts: 11,910
This thread is hilarious I look forward to it every day .I knew about the larrys and cumberbitches but not the other crazys and id never heard the term tinhat.
minxymoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 00:35
milliejo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,061
Lol, the Larries stance is that the boys are all millennials, who never have kids in their early 20s, so the babies must be fake. They have a 2+2=553 thing going on. It'd be hilarious if someone came forward with a four year old and sold a story about the kid being Harry's.
That is because most millennials can't afford to leave home, and if they are stuck on zero hour contracts, even dating is out of reach, let alone having a child that they will have to pay for, for life on top of student loans, rent and everything else.

Louis and Liam are rich, so they are not normal millennials, and they have wealthy baby mothers too.
milliejo is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 08:33
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
They are still expecting that lol. They have great hopes for Louis' 25th birthday, for 2017 and then for the rest of the 21st century. The reality probably is that he had the paternity test in utero as you say and then decided to declare paternity to the nation, a possibly misguided move as if he'd stayed quiet the Larries would never have suspected and would have left Briana alone. His own father abandoned him at birth so maybe he was trying to make a better job of it.

One of them is called lawyerlarrie, but her favourite saying is 'the law is irrelevant' and that people don't get prosecuted for stuff like birth certificate fraud unless someone 'presses charges'. She seems never to have heard of the state pressing charges.
Good grief. Poor things. What an unhappy hobby to have - they are going to get nothing but misery and disappointment as the years go by if they persist in believing this nonsense.

Or is it just extended fanfiction for most of them, and they realise, deep in their hearts, the two men haven't been in each other's company for almost a year now?
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 17:21
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
Good grief. Poor things. What an unhappy hobby to have - they are going to get nothing but misery and disappointment as the years go by if they persist in believing this nonsense.

Or is it just extended fanfiction for most of them, and they realise, deep in their hearts, the two men haven't been in each other's company for almost a year now?
I do wonder that. Maybe it is just fanfiction, and it's something they do to pass the time and make friends with others who ship the same couple, but sometimes they just whip each other into a frenzy because they have a particularly dull piece of homework to do It's the same with loads of ships. They do a film, or do one or two projects together, then they are never seen in each others company again. Probably because they have actual lives to lead, but apparently they will realise eventually are each others' true love!
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 22:52
tszujme
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 473
Margot Robbie seems to have found herself the victim of some ridiculous shopping nonsense. She posted a picture of herself missing her long term partner, Tom Ackerly and got reams and reams of abuse from people who ship jer with Jared Leto. Because of a film he was hardly in! Someone posted a link to the boyfriends instagram as well, so no doubt hes getting a ton of abuse too now. I really can't understand how these people dont realise that abusing someones partner on their own instagram account is crossing a line!
OMG I went to look. They call their ship 'Jargot" and are openly posting the most awful nonsense. They genuinely don't realise these are actual human beings.
tszujme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 23:24
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
OMG I went to look. They call their ship 'Jargot" and are openly posting the most awful nonsense. They genuinely don't realise these are actual human beings.
It's horrendous isn't it? I don't follow Margot Robbie, I just came across it, and I felt awful for her. Even if she blocks posts, it took 2 seconds to realise her brother was posting on the thread and having to see that rubbish being written.
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 05:02
FingersAndToes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,486

Margot Robbie seems to have found herself the victim of some ridiculous shopping nonsense. She posted a picture of herself missing her long term partner, Tom Ackerly and got reams and reams of abuse from people who ship jer with Jared Leto. Because of a film he was hardly in! Someone posted a link to the boyfriends instagram as well, so no doubt hes getting a ton of abuse too now. I really can't understand how these people dont realise that abusing someones partner on their own instagram account is crossing a line!
This is how they drove Jamie Dornan off social media. The Dakota/Jamie shippers were tweeting horrible stuff about his wife, and he went and deleted his twitter account.
FingersAndToes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 08:28
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
This is how they drove Jamie Dornan off social media. The Dakota/Jamie shippers were tweeting horrible stuff about his wife, and he went and deleted his twitter account.
I don't blame him. The studio's used to get actors to go on social media to publicise projects, but I don't know if they still do because of the trolls and real life shippers. If I was a celeb and I had to do this, I would literally just get a PR company to post the odd film promo and not engage at all. Then it becomes nothing more than another ad, and everyone suffers because some people aren't being taught boundaries. I would love to know what their mentality is, but when they are challenged, they just say they are entitled to their opinion! Well yes, but keep your stupid opinions to yourself or private shipping groups.
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 17:50
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
Lol, the Larries stance is that the boys are all millennials, who never have kids in their early 20s, so the babies must be fake. They have a 2+2=553 thing going on. It'd be hilarious if someone came forward with a four year old and sold a story about the kid being Harry's.
That's my plan for next year. I shall borrow my nephew ( he's 3 and oh so cute with curly hair) and arrange a photoshoot with one of the tabloids, claiming he is Harry Styles' child. Harry Styles will take one look at me (wearing scratchy Ann Summers lingerie and a sad face) and say ffs, don't be ridiculous. Then sue me for zillions. And I will be a contender for IACGMOOH 2017
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 18:14
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
That's my plan for next year. I shall borrow my nephew ( he's 3 and oh so cute with curly hair) and arrange a photoshoot with one of the tabloids, claiming he is Harry Styles' child. Harry Styles will take one look at me (wearing scratchy Ann Summers lingerie and a sad face) and say ffs, don't be ridiculous. Then sue me for zillions. And I will be a contender for IACGMOOH 2017
Ok! was thinking of passing my 5 year old off as lil Harry! He likes an oldie, so I reckon no one will bat an eyelid at the 20 year age gap
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 18:26
Gardena
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 564
I could offer my 3 year old niece (also with curly hair).
Gardena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 08:23
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
We could all claim our various children were the result of a night of passion with Styles. Although I don't fancy getting my head kicked in by Directioners
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 08:46
Salcy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 280
Frankie by the looks of things you won't need those reborn dolls. There will be enough people ready to hire out their children as Fabies
Salcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:53
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
Frankie by the looks of things you won't need those reborn dolls. There will be enough people ready to hire out their children as Fabies
I need to recruit a newborn baby actor for the Payne-Tweedy kid - shall I ask on Mumsnet?
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 14:08
SparklySwede
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 949
I thoroughly enjoy reading different blogs about Taylor Swift being in a relationship with Karlie Kloss. I actually find it fascinating how much effort the "Kaylors" put into their theories. For example! I don't know much about "Larries" but it's in the same vein going by this thread - overanalysing the smallest details while disregarding the bigger picture. It's odd how a lot of these people seem to be fairly old for this behaviour. Most of the ones I've come across have been approx 23 - so grown adults not teenagers!

I don't get this whole "shipping" real people thing at all..
SparklySwede is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:01.