Originally Posted by catkins198:
“We also had Greg who had never danced and was doing well, better than Ed but most people seem to want to ignore that. Why not "good for Greg for improving week on week"?
Maybe Greg should have gone down the comedy route and then perhaps he would not have been in the dance off last night.
Greg improved enormously and a couple of his dances I really enjoyed, including last night's one. He was miles better than Ed (he did the right steps whereas Ed did not, despite what some posters are saying, do a jive) and personally I thought he danced better than Rinder.
I don't dislike Ed but I don't get all the fawning over him. Yes he is improving but so was Greg and Rinder and Ed is improving much much slower than either of them. Ed is probably a nice guy but I think Greg is just as nicer, in fact nicer (not so keen on Rinder). Ed is enjoying himself and wants to stay. Well so was Greg and Rinder.”
I think Greg was very likeable, and having a decent stab at it as somebody coming in with zero experience. I was voting for him and would have liked him to go further. But not everybody feels the same and he got fewer votes, that's just the way the show goes *shrugs*. No good tying yourself up in knots with all the "why?"s and "what-if"?s
He's gone, I've moved on and will throw the extra votes to Ed or Judge R.
Originally Posted by catkins198:
“I am just interested in why you say Ed did do a jive. It was meant to be a jive, the steps were meant to be jive steps BUT Ed did not do them properly. Where was the flick or kick of the jive steps?
I would guess that you think Peter Andre did a jive last year? He certainly did not though”
Peter Andre's jive was abysmal, no doubt about it. But didn't he get 9s and 10s from the judges? Is somebody going to tell them it wasn't a jive?