Originally Posted by Thine Wonk:
“Sorry I just had to get that off my chest.”
“Sorry I just had to get that off my chest.”
But that was a misrepresentation of what 3 did.
No one would complain if 3 actually told the truth and said "it'll take a while and we're doing it this way, sorry for the wait but we don't want to disappoint". What they actually did was lie and obfuscate the facts.
Announcing a list of "4G cities" and then actually not bothering to turn on a good chunk of them. Of those that did get "turned on", they considered it job done when one cell site within the city limits was switched on, even if only about 10 people could use it. Being unclear with how they were doing the process. Ask three different CS advisors, get three different answers, none of them being correct.
Others were annoyed about their constant banging on about "4G at no extra cost" even though it showed in both a lack of coverage and performance.
EE aren't saying too much - and that's fine. 3 were the opposite. Making big fanfare about it and then turning it into a damp squib.




I did not offend anyone here just want to post as you do. I think I respect everybody and have not been as aggressive as some members
