On the audition stage, the show was doing good even better than it was on last year's auditions. The judges had chemistry. It was a fun show to watch. The ratings were increasing week on week. A lot of great acts and a lot of potential contenders were built up.
However, moving from the six chairs to the judges' houses and to the live shows, the show started losing viewers. Lesser than it was last year. I really it was the Judgess' Houses where people started tuning off the show, the show had the chance to save the declining ratings with putting in an excellent batch of acts. Honestly if they've put in Caitlyn, Peyton, Janet, James Wilson, Skarl3t, Christian and Nate instead of the likes of Gifty, Honey G, Emily, Ryan, and Bratavio. They might have save the show. And it would be a lot better if they made it into a top 16. And the theme wheel would have been good if they have placed more better themes rather than themes you know that they will pick an old song and trying to make it more older. And dated song choices!!!
Poor song choices. Poor critiques from the panel. Mentors not caring for their acts. Obvious manipulation. Clear favouritism. Favouring novelty over talent.
However, moving from the six chairs to the judges' houses and to the live shows, the show started losing viewers. Lesser than it was last year. I really it was the Judgess' Houses where people started tuning off the show, the show had the chance to save the declining ratings with putting in an excellent batch of acts. Honestly if they've put in Caitlyn, Peyton, Janet, James Wilson, Skarl3t, Christian and Nate instead of the likes of Gifty, Honey G, Emily, Ryan, and Bratavio. They might have save the show. And it would be a lot better if they made it into a top 16. And the theme wheel would have been good if they have placed more better themes rather than themes you know that they will pick an old song and trying to make it more older. And dated song choices!!!
Poor song choices. Poor critiques from the panel. Mentors not caring for their acts. Obvious manipulation. Clear favouritism. Favouring novelty over talent.




