• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Ore over marked ?
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
Dis_A_aster
19-11-2016
Where did the three 10's come from when the top line was not perfect.
Claudia was marked down for her small mistake why not Ore
BeeBumble
19-11-2016
He was better than Claudia and because they gave her 9s willy nilly they had no choice but to give Ore 10s.
Dervlathedog
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dis_A_aster:
“Where did the three 10's come from when the top line was not perfect.
Claudia was marked down for her small mistake why not Ore”

Claudia was really brave and kept going strongly but her jive felt a little de-energised and disjointed. I think the judges were rightly generous to her. Music was wrong. Staging was distracting. But if Claudia got nines, Ore deserved his tens, especially balanced by Craig's prob too low eight. Jo's choreography was fab and Ore was sooooo cool and good. It was a proper performance.

Really pleased for him and Jo. (And glad the judges were kind to Claudia)

If Claudia got eights, nines for Ore. That's just how it goes...
Xassy
19-11-2016
I agree that they had no choice but to give him 10s after overmarking Claudia. He wasn't worth that score. He was good but not that good.
edy10
19-11-2016
I am so relieved that the first overmarked thread isn't about Danny. 😂😂😂 Ore.
Everyone so far has been overmarked. Yes even my favorite Danny. IT'S blackpool, the judges get crazy with their paddles.
Dervlathedog
19-11-2016
Serious question, why does the forum always pick on Ore? Everyone was overmarked. Danny most of all. Well, apart from Ed. He deserved better than Craig's four IMO.

What is it about Ore, I wonder?
edy10
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Serious question, why does the forum always pick on Ore? Everyone was overmarked. Danny most of all. Well, apart from Ed. He deserved better than Craig's four IMO.

What is it about Ore, I wonder?”

It could be that they just don't like him and it's not just forum btw.
Dervlathedog
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by edy10:
“It could be that they just don't like him and it's not just forum btw.”

Really? OK, what does the UK have against Ore?
Vodka_Drinka
19-11-2016
Louise was better than him yet is lower on the leader board.
Berysm
19-11-2016
Yes, though they had nowhere to go after overmarking Claudia, so in the context of the leaderboard it's right.
Skyrah
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Really? OK, what does the UK have against Ore?”

apparently he cries every week
sambadan
19-11-2016
They were overscored but all the couples have been overscored. All in all the whole show has been an utter farce.
Goblin99
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Serious question, why does the forum always pick on Ore? Everyone was overmarked. Danny most of all. Well, apart from Ed. He deserved better than Craig's four IMO.

What is it about Ore, I wonder?”

I don't see any "picking on" Ore. There are people who like him and people who don't.

Personally what I see of his personality on the program grates on me and I think he is too hyped and favoured. This is something that developed from the start of the series, because for the launch I had him down as someone I might like and I was surprised to feel the opposite.

I don't agree with the judges' comments about his dancing for the most part.
If you want me to go through, dance by dance, and point out the issues I see and the problems I have with their comments and marking, I can. But I suspect that wouldn't accomplish anything.

You have your opinion, others have theirs.
*Liya*
19-11-2016
He has been overmarked every week.
edy10
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Really? OK, what does the UK have against Ore?”

DO I speak for the UK lol why are you asking me
Collins1965
19-11-2016
Yes he was overmarked OP but that's nothing new
Dervlathedog
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by edy10:
“DO I speak for the UK lol why are you asking me ”

You were saying it wasn't just the forum. Not asking you for your opinion again, simply taking your point on board
Minnie_Holder
19-11-2016
Under marked, I would have given that 10 plus.
nyannie
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Xassy:
“I agree that they had no choice but to give him 10s after overmarking Claudia. He wasn't worth that score. He was good but not that good.”

I agree - I think Claudia should have gotten 8s and 9s and Ore 9s. Loved Danny and Oti and the Judge - felt Ed was flat this week.
edy10
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Because you were saying it wasn't just the forum. Not asking you for your opinion again, simply taking your point on board”

Well read what the other posts said about him in this thread . Those are the criticisms that I've seen veered towards him.
lucy777
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Serious question, why does the forum always pick on Ore? Everyone was overmarked. Danny most of all. Well, apart from Ed. He deserved better than Craig's four IMO.

What is it about Ore, I wonder?”

^^^ This, this & this again
sarasarasara
19-11-2016
The marking this evening was all over the place for all the couples, but the board itself is pretty much the order it should be imo.
80sQueen
19-11-2016
I honestly thought Ore had gone wrong so they just did a spin for a minute instead of a dance.

Mind you I thought Claudia's jive was worse than Ed's & I had really high hopes for Claudia
Liza with a Zee
19-11-2016
Ore was ridiculously overnarked. His waltz was not a 10. I agree with Craig totally 8 was all it was worth. Really disappointed that they felt the need to so that. What's the point? He's likely to be bottom 2 anyway hopefully not knocking out anyone good
claire2281
19-11-2016
Compared to what Claudia was given for an okay Jive, he was undermarked by Craig and marked fairly by the other 3. They should've given Claudia more like what it deserved (8) then there wouldn't have been an issue.
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map