Originally Posted by Janet43:
“I wonder how many that would be. It's a family entertainment show based around dance and I'd suggest that the majority are happy seeing a good entertaining show than seeing all dances danced to perfection, the ages of viewers ranging from 5 to 105 with a variety of interests.
I prefer to see a variety of achievements and would be bored silly with a show full of Danny and Louises.”
Dances danced to perfection would also have to be entertaining. Nobody's talking about robotic, joyless dancing here.
Personally, I don't find stumping through ~~WHACKY~~ dances to be entertaining. I know I look to be alone in that, but I just don't. Forced comedy doesn't entertain me. Now, as Greg was one of my favorites, I obviously don't
need perfection, but I need them to actually try the dances instead of falling back on being funny. I didn't even mind Ed most of the time (hell, even the Halloween dance was entertaining, but it was
Halloween), but Gangnam Style was where I drew the line. I'm done. That's when, in my mind, he and Katya just gave up. Hell, even that Quickstep that had about 20 seconds of actual Quickstep had more of the actual dance than that Gangnam crap.