|
||||||||
It is NOT a "DANCE" competition |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 756
|
Actually it's a hot air production show ....
Basically, Strictly Come Dancing is a live show on Sats and Sundays that - if you exclude the fat slob Peter Kay - is safe family viewing.
It is watchable precisely because all the dancers refuse to accept the "Generation Game" perception of the show and the amateur contestants take a real pride in their improving prowess. Greg Rutherford's tears were genuine. The life on the Forums is a strange jungly beast that prowls across the ether, swallowing, then spitting out, thousands of keyboard tappers every week. This is a social phenomenon that escaped all science fiction writers in the 1950s, the 1960s, the 1970s and even the 1980s. They just didn't see it coming.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
|
It's a Saturday night TV show whose primary aim is to get as many viewers as possible. To that end, it offers something for multiple demographics and tastes. It's not six of one and half a dozen of the other by accident. It's like it on purpose.
The end. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
BIB: I think you'll find in general that the people who completely get that it's a bit of Saturday night fluff are not the same people as those who get angry about ringers.
I'm not sure anyone has said good dancing can't be entertaining. The point being made is that it's not the only thing that people can find entertaining about the show. Which is exactly how the Beeb have always wanted it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: whitby , n yorks
Posts: 10,118
|
The same mix of able/less able celeb dancers, great professional teachers, entertaining judges, fun presenters, glitz, glamour, etc has worked & pulled in millions of viewers for is it 14 series' now so I REALLY don't see the Beeb changing a winning formula anytime soon & I for one couldn't be more delighted!!
Whether you view it as dancing or entertainment is down to personal opinion I guess but personally I see no problem in viewing it as both!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In sunny (hah!) Yorkshire
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
No season has ever had "ringers" in it. What a load of rubbish.
Quote:
Without the set choreography in place, without the "song" that they are familiar with, the celeb would be lost if any other track was played in its place
I could count on probably one hand the number of celebrities who might have been able to "freestyle" a routine and put the steps they'd used to a different piece of music. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
|
Quote:
Thanks Jennifer, I've said this many times over the years. The celebrities are taught a specific set of steps to a specific piece of music for a specific routine. They're not being taught to dance as most people would understand that terminology.
I could count on probably one hand the number of celebrities who might have been able to "freestyle" a routine and put the steps they'd used to a different piece of music. We don' t expect this from the celebs of course, but they just learn steps to music. This is the reason why, if they get to the finals, they still dance to the same pieces of music they did first time around. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 495
|
[quote=mimi dlc;84631741.
It's an entertainment programme based around dancing[/QUOTE] Agree, just as Dancing on Ice is an entertainment programme based around moving on the ice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
Every season has had "ringers" in it given the criterion for being a SCD "ringer" from Claire Sweeney through Jill Halfpenny and Jay McGuinness and now to Danny Mac - ringer in this instance being someone who has had stage school experience which includes an element of dance training.
Thanks Jennifer, I've said this many times over the years. The celebrities are taught a specific set of steps to a specific piece of music for a specific routine. They're not being taught to dance as most people would understand that terminology. I could count on probably one hand the number of celebrities who might have been able to "freestyle" a routine and put the steps they'd used to a different piece of music. I know it wasn't a "freestyle" but what you say here reminds me of Aliona and Jay's showdance last year which was absolutely magical for me. I know Aliona was criticised for her choreography but I loved seeing Jay dancing all the steps he had learned from the start of the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
|
Quote:
I do wish people would Really understand that this is NOT a dance competition if it were then we the Great British public would NOT get our say as the majority of us probably are not dance experts or trained to judge.
This is a prime time Saturday evening family entertainment show, the original format was to take "celebrities" and teach them to dance, alas because more and more "able to dance in the first place" celebs are invited to take part it somehow clouds those with no experience whatsoever who are genuinely trying their best. Alas as people have got used to the "better abled" celebs those who are REALLY trying their very best are constantly slammed on here - so unfair.. I enjoyed the show much more when it wasn't so blooming predictable - the judges too need to get a grip and stop having obvious favourites. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
It is a dance competition. Just not necessarily one to find the best dancer.
I thought most people knew that? Surely? Seriously? |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In sunny (hah!) Yorkshire
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
Spot on. As ever.
I thought most people knew that? Surely? Seriously?
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 559
|
Quote:
What's the point of spending hours to train if you don't need to be a good dancer?
This is actually an insulting thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,120
|
Quote:
So what are most of them doing spending up to 8 hours a day training ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
|
Quote:
It used to be a dance competition for beginners and the public to enjoy their journey, but now it's a platform for trained dancers to get some exposure and get some good breaks. BBC might as well show the British and World dance championships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
|
IMO yes the best dancer should win as the show is called Strictly Come DANCING
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,972
|
Quote:
I know it wasn't a "freestyle" but what you say here reminds me of Aliona and Jay's showdance last year which was absolutely magical for me. I know Aliona was criticised for her choreography but I loved seeing Jay dancing all the steps he had learned from the start of the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 🕳
Posts: 1,852
|
It is at our house! We are the judges, so there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,357
|
If it's not a dancing show then why are pro dancers hired to teach celebs how to DANCE?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 819
|
It is a dance competition. But not a dance competition based on the technically best dancer. Instead it's based on:
- charisma - professional partnership - entertainment - choreography In the year when the standard is apparently the highest it's ever been, all these things are going to count even more than dance technique. |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
It is a dance competition. But not a dance competition based on the technically best dancer. Instead it's based on:
- charisma - professional partnership - entertainment - choreography In the year when the standard is apparently the highest it's ever been, all these things are going to count even more than dance technique. Still want to push that theory?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,629
|
Thought the show was called Strictly Come Dancing.
![]() What have I been watching for the last 12 years? |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Thought the show was called Strictly Come Dancing.
![]() What have I been watching for the last 12 years? |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,629
|
Quote:
A prime time Saturday entertainment show where the aim is, through judges' scores and public votes, to find the most popular celebrity that has achieved a pretty good standard of dancing and has hopefully improved from their starting point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
It used to be a dance competition for beginners and the public to enjoy their journey, but now it's a platform for trained dancers to get some exposure and get some good breaks. BBC might as well show the British and World dance championships.
What Strictly hasn't had is a good journey story for some time -where someone did really improve to win . its also been short of really top, memorable, performances for some time. Thats partly because its had some winners who just grabbed a female fanbase , some winners who were hyped up by the judges for gains they hadn't made, and some who were the most interesting of those left after a surprise departure. . Meanwhile, some people's journeys ended because they got too tired, or started up on other commitments, or got dud music and a difficult dance in a week where others got something they could shine in., or went, so the comedy act could stay. Its also deteriorated as they have put in more good dancers to counter the possibility that the public vote will remove too many good performers , and because they have now seemingly stopped having such a big group of weak beginners. Thats meant the average is better, but they are not finding any surprises, or massive improvement stories. And some decent prospects who might develop, have to go earlier while the are still behind the pack. They also failed to pick up really big names this year - they are now down to Bronze medallists in an Olympic year., soap actors and forgotten ex singers. There's no Jackson, Pendelton or Lewis - partly because they don't pay enough ,and partly because most 2016 Olympians are going on to 2020. .And a side effect of having more good, but not outstandin, g dancers, or stories, is that there's little point picking one of a larger group of good prospects, because there's a smaller chance they will reach the final, or the judges will care about them. It looks as if they now don't actually care about the content, They pick enough trained people to have a reliable final, spend some money on staging and supporting dancers to make it look a bit spectacular, select who they want to keep , for whatever reason, and pick one story to hype if they can be bothered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 440
|
Yes, it is.
Just because it's not a professional ballroom dance competition does not mean it's not a dancing competition. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28.




