Georgia said that just last year!

And yes, to the poster who mentioned that Nat has a tendency to gush, she does, but I don't recall her stroking their faces, something I have see her do with Greg three times.

To be fair he was holding Daisy pretty tight last week too.

After they had been eliminated, the impression they gave me was that this is Natalie's last Series (though I think she has said she was offered a 2 year contract?).

Natalie is also engaged to James Knibbs AFAIK.

I wasn't refering to how tight it was, but the length he held on for!

She is engaged. Georgia was in a relationship. Rachel Riley had only been married about a year. Ben Cohen was married with kids...

Joe Calzaghe?

He'd sort of finished a relationship but I think there was a possiblity of them getting back together which didn't happen after Strictly. I'm just going by what I remember here. He was at least technically single.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...r-rumours.html

As with anything you remember the dramatic examples. What about those whom there were rumours about where nothing was going on at all? Abbey and Ali spring immediately to mind and James and Camelia's fauxmance. Smoke machines exist people as does smoke coming from cooking which triggers the smoke alarms without the place about to burn to the ground.

And vice versa. Janette comes across as a lovely with such a positive personality and a few of the pros have said she is the nicest on it takes 2, Aljaz is lucky to have her. Nice couple.

I was making the point that just because a celeb/pro has a boyfriend/girlfriend, fiancé/fiancée, husband/wife it doesn't mean they're not going to fall in love/lust with their celeb/pro. We've seen it happen several times on strictly, now.

I have no idea if Greg and Natalie fancy each other or not she was certainly very gushy with him which I didn't like when they both have partners, but what I do have a problem with is how touchy feely some of the couples are when they are not dancing i.e. on ITT and when they are waiting to find out whether they are through to the next week on the results show. Not everyone behaves like this so it can't be a requirement of the show that you must have your arms round each other when you are waiting for the results.

I understand that there has to be a lot of physical contact and intimacy while they are dancing and training (as far as I'm concerned that is a performance and you are acting and dancing a part) but I would feel really uncomfortable if someone was touching and pawing me in any other situation and I would definitely have a problem if a professional was behaving in that way with my partner!!

Not much sympathy for Camilla in the comments underneath this story is there.

^Exactly!

Again it's the squeeky wheels mentality and what's the lesson you learn. Don't let your partner do Strictly? Lots of people do strictly and don't fall prey to so-called curse. We don't know anything is happening and there must a lot of times where there is rumours but nothing happens Aliaz seems particular prone to them must be because he's a friendly guy who happens to be partnered with pretty women whom he gets on well with.

One of the big ones much earlier was some people convinced that Mark Ramprakash and Karen Hardy were having an affair, only for it to then transpire that Mark had been having a 6 year affair with someone else!

He then supposedly ended it, split up with his wife, married someone else, and that didn't work out either.

Why? It happened to her, it's her story, she has every right to bring it up.

Im very pleased to hear Natalie say on ITT tonight that she has become close friends to Greg and his partner Sue and family and that she and Greg could not have done so well without the support of their respective partners.

She does put although I'd have put it more tactfully I do wonder why she's still talking about years later when all three parties have moved on and have spouses and chlldren.

Yes, but did she say they were like brother and sister?

Sorry. I'll go back to the naughty step.

From reading the article, She's written an autobiography and presumably is promoting it. So she would obviously be asked Qs about the biggest thing to happen to her (as far as her expected audience are concerned)

Fair enough.

They possibly do fancy each other but that doesn't mean anything will come of it.

I worked with a lady for 9 years and we got on brilliantly. We were best mates and did end up fancying each other and admitted it to each other as well. However, we're both in relationships and nothing was ever going to come of it. I've been round her house numerous times, met her husband, spent many happy hours playing with her 2 young kids aged 4 and 1 .
I don't work with her anymore but we still keep in touch and I look forward to seeing her and her family at Christmas.
You can fancy someone without having to jump into the sack with them

I felt it was said for a purpose though!

Like others it seemed a little too OTT for me.