• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here!
Can't stand Scarlett the stirrer
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
anne_666
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by hisdogspot:
“I think I'm right in thinking Scarlet has been either 'President' or 'Vice President' of the camp since the start ... and therefore has not lifted a finger since she's been in there

Now I know that was down to the public vote, nevertheless, it seems a bit off to me for someone who hasn't done a stroke so far, to be whinging about who isn't pulling their weight in there”

Why should the whole camp be penalised and lose dingo dollars because Martin wouldn't do as he was told and not for the first time?Is that fair?
slappers r us
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“Why should the whole camp be penalised and lose dingo dollars because Martin wouldn't do as he was told and not for the first time?Is that fair?”

But it wasnt Martin who lost any DD for the group was it?
No one rallied together to berate those who did lose them did they so how is that fair?
Did Scarlett in her role as president berate them?
I guess not
lylonic_x
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“But it wasnt Martin who lost any DD for the group was it?
No one rallied together to berate those who did lose them did they so how is that fair?
Did Scarlett in her role as president berate them?
I guess not”

I have to agree with this.....when they started to lose the DD last night, everyone was laughing about others doing someone else's work and stuff
anne_666
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“But it wasnt Martin who lost any DD for the group was it?
No one rallied together to berate those who did lose them did they so how is that fair?
Did Scarlett in her role as president berate them?
I guess not”

How do you know? We didn't see the tally that night.
What we did see was the fine for minor and some unintentional infractions from that one day. Not anyone repeatedly behaving like an arrogant muppet, refusing to do their own job and treating Scarlett the way he had.

Regardless of anything else they're all supposed to do as they're told by the camp President without question. Scarlett had asked him repeatedly to get water, he argued, talked down to her and ignored her, which Wayne, at least, also confirmed. Why should Martin be allowed to ignore that basic rule? He's supposed to be a 50 plus year old adult not a petulant 5 year old. He's not at home now which he's had to learn the hard way.
slappers r us
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“How do you know? We didn't see the tally that night.
What we did see was the fine for minor and some unintentional infractions from that one day. Not anyone repeatedly behaving like an arrogant muppet, refusing to do their own job and treating Scarlett the way he had.

Regardless of anything else they're all supposed to do as they're told by the camp President without question. Scarlett had asked him repeatedly to get water, he argued, talked down to her and ignored her, which Wayne, at least, also confirmed. Why should Martin be allowed to ignore that basic rule? He's supposed to be a 50 plus year old adult not a petulant 5 year old. He's not at home now which he's had to learn the hard way.”

How do I know?, because they told us
viva.espana
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“How do you know? We didn't see the tally that night.
What we did see was the fine for minor and some unintentional infractions from that one day. Not anyone repeatedly behaving like an arrogant muppet, refusing to do their own job and treating Scarlett the way he had.

Regardless of anything else they're all supposed to do as they're told by the camp President without question. Scarlett had asked him repeatedly to get water, he argued, talked down to her and ignored her, which Wayne, at least, also confirmed. Why should Martin be allowed to ignore that basic rule? He's supposed to be a 50 plus year old adult not a petulant 5 year old. He's not at home now which he's had to learn the hard way.”

But Martin wasn't responsible for any of the fines. They listed them and they all involved other campers. I know Martin is a bit of a prat but his tardiness and petulance didn't break any camp rules so he can't be blamed for the DD deduction.
anne_666
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“How do I know?, because they told us”

They didn't, not for that day. We only saw the tally for what happened during the day after his fiasco. The day Adam did his trial. It's done on a daily basis we just don't get to see it often.
Sweetiecat
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“They didn't, not for that day. We only saw the tally for what happened during the day after his fiasco. The day Adam did his trial. It's done on a daily basis we just don't get to see it often.”

If you look at the total number of dingo dollars they had to spend on treats it would seem that they only lost dollars on one day and that was the day the showed and listed the misdemeanours.
I guess they don't bother showing it if the get them all.
slappers r us
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“They didn't, not for that day. We only saw the tally for what happened during the day after his fiasco. The day Adam did his trial. It's done on a daily basis we just don't get to see it often.”

So why were they so shocked to lose DD on the day after Martins "fiasco" ?
If Martin had lost them DD they would have known that by doing others jobs they would lose DD and not have meddled with others jobs the day after

Im not that bothered about Martin I would rather see more of Ola, Jordan, Sam and Lisa than any of the other celebs but it seems the utter dislike for Martin is an excuse to blame him for everything that goes wrong
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map