Originally Posted by shrinkingviolet:
“I've loved watching him - he's a duffer, but one who has actually improved as well. I think he's doing a great job and he and Katya are a great, fun partnership. Watching them makes me smile and although there are others I want to win or get to the final, I'm glad that he's still in.”
Ed Balls is the official "joker" dancer for this year - but he has outperformed all the previous fat guys/fall guys and dolls. Far more nimble, a better performer and HE DANCES ON THE BEAT. That is important - seriously, it is important - particularly for Bruno, who sets great store by this.
Having said that, everybody was expecting the danceoff to be Ed and Greg, with Ed going gracefully with a wink and a smile. But the Unexpected Always Happens, in live TV.
Finally, when will all the furious naysayers understand that if they want to see a contestant leave, they should vote more for the others. An unbelievable number of people post and tweet that they don't bother to vote until the finals - maybe they can't afford the calls because they had to spend so much on twiglets and crisps and booze in order to be able to stay on the sofa watching the programme. So 2 packets fewer crisps, some exercise with phone keys, et voilą - the better dancers have a better chance of going through!
But when viewers decide they "cannot warm" to one of the better dancers because they are "smug", "fake" etc etc - then of course those who vote will go for the most entertaining, whatever their standard of technique.
So why are people so surprised, week after week, when that happens?