Originally Posted by Leicester_Hunk:
“Just had a chat in the office over break. My colleagues - 7 of them here today - all women. They have talked more about Ed Balls than anything else on the box last weekend, but I discussed this with them. The consensus is that they love watching Danny Mac because he is so good, will only get better, easy on the eye, entertaining and has star quality and can see him in the West End before too long. I was told that Mark Ramprakash was just as good but he had never danced, so it's just how the "cookie crumbles". They liked Greg because he was "cute" and Rob Rinder because he is a trier and an improver as is Claudia but with more finesse. None of them are keen on Louise and Kevin. They like Ed Balls because he is bloody hilarious and one woman actually says she rather fancies him. They expect he will do panto.”
Mark Ramprakash was good, but he really wasn't a patch on Danny Mac. Obviously everyone has their own opinion and some people will enjoy looking at Mark more, but I honestly think if most people watched their dances one after the other Danny would come out ahead. He's a much better dancer.
I imagine another workplace would net a different result anyway - clearly
some people rate Louise and Kevin more highly than Claudia and AJ, because they haven't yet been in the dance off.
I do agree that Ed Balls is likely to get people talking in any workplace - but I think his ambitions still lean more towards politics than panto!