• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Balls out this week
<<
<
2 of 9
>>
>
Leicester_Hunk
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Yes and quite rightly so!

Let's not forget that Pixie Lott won the 'waltz-a-thon' in her year and was eliminated that same weekend, it means sod all really. Its just a way to fill up time and allow the judges to manipulate the leaderboard, but if the public vote against it then it still won't work.

Louise V Danny dance-off anyone? ”

What, they would allow Kevin to get in the dance off?
DiamondDoll
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Yes and quite rightly so!

Let's not forget that Pixie Lott won the 'waltz-a-thon' in her year and was eliminated that same weekend, it means sod all really. Its just a way to fill up time and allow the judges to manipulate the leaderboard, but if the public vote against it then it still won't work.

Louise V Danny dance-off anyone?
”

Can't you just imagine the temper tantrums around here?

Bring it on.
Tejas
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Leicester_Hunk:
“What, they would allow Kevin to get in the dance off?”

It happened last year...

If Kevin and Louise in the DO is impossible, then the show is fixed. I believe its heavily manipulated, but not fixed.
Monkseal
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“It happened last year....”

Yes, oddly enough the "athon" really ditched Kellie & Kevin in it last year, dropping them from 3rd out of 7 to 6th out of 7 and probably from safety into the dance off

Never really gets mentioned amidst all the "KELLIE/KEVIN WAS THE JUDGES FAVOURITE" spin around these parts...
Tinkle
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Yes and quite rightly so!

Let's not forget that Pixie Lott won the 'waltz-a-thon' in her year and was eliminated that same weekend, it means sod all really. Its just a way to fill up time and allow the judges to manipulate the leaderboard, but if the public vote against it then it still won't work.

Louise V Danny dance-off anyone? ”

rather have Louise and Ore in the dance off
Leicester_Hunk
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“It happened last year...

If Kevin and Louise in the DO is impossible, then the show is fixed. I believe its heavily manipulated, but not fixed.”

I'd forgotten that. I thought he'd never been in it.
Alleycat666
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“Yes, oddly enough the "athon" really ditched Kellie & Kevin in it last year, dropping them from 3rd out of 7 to 6th out of 7 and probably from safety into the dance off

Never really gets mentioned amidst all the "KELLIE/KEVIN WAS THE JUDGES FAVOURITE" spin around these parts...”

Monkseal - as you're here, for Ed to avoid the DO it is better for there to be ties isn't it - so if the Cha-Cha-athon smoothes them out, then we're more likely to lose him - yes?
kaycee
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Leicester_Hunk:
“To do this you would have to scrap the public vote. And with it a heck of a lot of revenue.”

They - the beeb - don't get any revenue from the voting, that stopped when some years ago when there was a lot of hoo-ha about voting on these sort of shows generally, although to be fair, Strictly was not one of those accused. But the phone calls are all taken and sorted by an outside company - the price of voting also went down accordingly.
-Sid-
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Gill P:
“My husband, who isn't a fan by any means, says that if a celebrity is at the bottom of the judges' list for more than three weeks, they should be automatically eliminated. I doubt this would work but I can see his point.”


I can't.

What would be the point of someone like Ed even signing up for the show or if he did what would be the incentive to try as hard as he does from week to week knowing his bottom placing (can't think of a better way to phrase that ) would automatically get him eliminated?

Trying to engineer a way to get rid of someone you're not enjoying, even though others do, seems to go against the spirit of the show for me. I don't see Ed as a "problem" than needs "fixing". He's playing by the rules like everybody else - training hard to compete and entertain for votes.
Monkseal
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Alleycat666:
“Monkseal - as you're here, for Ed to avoid the DO it is better for there to be ties isn't it - so if the Cha-Cha-athon smoothes them out, then we're more likely to lose him - yes?”

Yes (presuming he's bottom of the leaderboard) - any tie helps out everyone below it and hurts everyone above it. The effect is also bigger the lower the tie is, so a tie between 4th and 5th helps Ed much more than one between 1st and 2nd.
Cadiva
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by kaycee:
“They - the beeb - don't get any revenue from the voting, that stopped when some years ago when there was a lot of hoo-ha about voting on these sort of shows generally, although to be fair, Strictly was not one of those accused. But the phone calls are all taken and sorted by an outside company - the price of voting also went down accordingly.”

Even before the hoo ha, the BBC didn't receive any money from the phone voting, they are not allowed to by law.

They are incorporated as a non profit organisation funded by the License Fee and have a wholly independent fund raising body - BBC Worldwide - which raises money to pay for programme creation through various means including the sale of rights to shows (like SCD) and DVD etc sales.
kaycee
22-11-2016
I admit I've loved watching some of Ed Balls routines, and no one can deny he works really hard. But it's now at a stage when I wouldn't mind if he went. But all credit to Katya who I think has done wonders.

On a different level, however much he is praised, I haven't enjoyed all Danny's routines. While his 'party' routines - Charleston, etc., have been excellent, as was his AT, his ballroom is not good, completely lacking in any finesse. Is that down to Oti? I don't know.
kaycee
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Cadiva:
“Even before the hoo ha, the BBC didn't receive any money from the phone voting, they are not allowed to by law.

They are incorporated as a non profit organisation funded by the License Fee and have a wholly independent fund raising body - BBC Worldwide - which raises money to pay for programme creation through various means including the sale of rights to shows (like SCD) and DVD etc sales.”

You are right, but on another level they did receive the money, as it was donated to Children in Need.

That changed when another show on ITV I think, were supposedly doing the same, - using the money for charity - but were accused of not donating all the money. There were problems along those lines with a lot of shows at the time.
Cadiva
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by kaycee:
“You are right, but on another level they did receive the money, as it was donated to Children in Need.

That changed when another show on ITV I think, were supposedly doing the same, - using the money for charity - but were accused of not donating all the money. There were problems along those lines with a lot of shows at the time.”

Children in Need is a charity so the BBC still didn't receive it. Yes it is a BBC established charity but it's run independently.

The BBC issue was because of phone votes to name a cat on Blue Peter when it was discovered the cat had already been named and so people were phoning up to vote, costing them money, when it was a foregone conclusion.
At that point Ofcom stepped in and said only programmes which were actual fund raising telethones like Children in Need, Text Santa etc, could use phone votes as a method of raising money. Hence the CiN fund raising stopped on Strictly and the cost of the call dropped.

(sorry if it sounds like I'm banging on about it but as a journalist at the time, I wrote an awful lot of stories about the funding rows )
What name??
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“& outscore the likes of Danny, Ore, Louise, Claudia & JR... I don't think so, he'll still be in last place.

”

If Danny tops the board then all my votes are free to support Ed...

Also I think supporters of Ore and Louise can also be reasonably confident that their pick will survive a dance off so are probably not that concerned.
Monkseal
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by What name??:
“If Danny tops the board then all my votes are free to support Ed...

Also I think supporters of Ore and Louise can also be reasonably confident that their pick will survive a dance off so are probably not that concerned. ”

As confident as Pixie's were?
Alleycat666
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by What name??:
“If Danny tops the board then all my votes are free to support Ed...

Also I think supporters of Ore and Louise can also be reasonably confident that their pick will survive a dance off so are probably not that concerned. ”

Unless of course they are against each other .... (can just imagine the forum meltdown/delight that Jo and Kevin would be facing each other.....)
Alleycat666
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“Yes (presuming he's bottom of the leaderboard) - any tie helps out everyone below it and hurts everyone above it. The effect is also bigger the lower the tie is, so a tie between 4th and 5th helps Ed much more than one between 1st and 2nd.”

Thanks - my head gets a bit scrambled sometimes with all the possibilities, but the long and the short of it is the judges need to ensure no ties if they really genuinely want Ed to stand the best chance of being in the DO.
calamity
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Leicester_Hunk:
“People are still going to vote for him, and Rob Rinder, in droves.”

The Judge can dance though. I like Ed and hes put so much into learning steps but hes clearly out of his league.
What name??
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Alleycat666:
“Unless of course they are against each other .... (can just imagine the forum meltdown/delight that Jo and Kevin would be facing each other.....)”

And that is why I think whether Ed survives depends on the ranking. Not convoluted stuff about ties and where but the top two places.

When your favorite is one of the contenders and comes in at 1 or 2 then you can afford to gift Ed a few votes. Because then they are unlikely to be in the dance off and more likely to beat anyone who goes up against them because the judges like their dance. There has never been a dance off between (1) and (2) as far as I can recall and I don't think it's possible. But clearly anyone in either position probably out-dance any of of the others.

My theory is that if Danny tops the leader board and Claudia is second then Ed is most likely to survive as I think those are the two with the largest support and their supporters can feel fairly relaxed that they are safe and so can go for the more entertaining dancer.
MaggieMcGee
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by What name??:
“And that is why I think whether Ed survives depends on the ranking. Not convoluted stuff about ties and where but the top two places.

When your favorite is one of the contenders and comes in at 1 or 2 then you can afford to gift Ed a few votes. Because then they are unlikely to be in the dance off and more likely to beat anyone who goes up against them because the judges like their dance. There has never been a dance off between (1) and (2) as far as I can recall and I don't think it's possible. But clearly anyone in either position probably out-dance any of of the others.

My theory is that if Danny tops the leader board and Claudia is second then Ed is most likely to survive as I think those are the two with the largest support and their supporters can feel fairly relaxed that they are safe and so can go for the more entertaining dancer.”

If this were so then she would not have been in the DO as it would have been Rob versus Greg. I suggest that Claudia and Ore have questionable public support since both are good dancers that have been bottom two.
calamity
22-11-2016
How do any of us know what the public vote really is,
MaggieMcGee
22-11-2016
We don't. We can but speculate by what we see week on week. Thus far neither Ed's or Rob's support has been fully tested although last week gave us the closest hint. We have no idea about Danny and Louise and, unless things go awry with the judges' voting, I doubt we will ever know as these seem a shoe-in for the final. The final 3 and 4 is to be fought by Claudia, Ed, Ore and Robert based upon public vs judge voting thus far.
aimeeaimee1000
22-11-2016
I think now is the right time for Ed to go I want the best dancers left for the final not another Chris Hollinsclough.
Bouzouki Boy
22-11-2016
Having re-read the thread title, I now have visions of Danny Mac having his trousers altered and dancing with his gonads hanging out - ooh saucy.
<<
<
2 of 9
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map