• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
Are some parents making people afraid to assist lost children
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
scottie2121
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“I didn't 'do nothing'. I sought the help of others and we sorted it out together.

How is that not doing the decent thing?

(And no 'whatbouttery' please. I described the situation I was in, and how I dealt with it)”

You said

"I would only help in conjunction with someone else (preferably a woman)"

and

"I would not have assisted on my own"

What I was asking was, If, in the situation you described, there was no one else around, would you have just walked away? I ask that because it sounds like you would never help a child if you had to do it by yourself.
scottie2121
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Paul_DNAP:
“Probably.”

You haven't got a mobile phone?
Paul_DNAP
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Harvey_Specter:
“If there was no one else around, who is it that's gonna 'fit you up' on social media?”

Presumably the point in intervening would be to take the child and find someone else. It is at that point it could all go wrong, some mad imbecile of a parent sees me in the street with the child and kicks off. Even worse if we'd happened to be walking in the wrong direction as that could be seen as "taking her away" rather than "bringing her back".

Originally Posted by scottie2121:
“You haven't got a mobile phone?”

Nope.

Although the child probably has.
netcurtains
23-11-2016
My husband once found two small children wandering down the middle of the road early hours, he didn't hesitate to sit them in the back of his car to keep them safe and ring the police. He didn't meet the mother but I doubt she would have thanked him, the police did though.
I'd help any child if I thought they looked like they needed it, don't much care if the parents thanked or abused me, I'd do it for the kid not them.
Welsh-lad
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by scottie2121:
“You said

"I would only help in conjunction with someone else (preferably a woman)"

and

"I would not have assisted on my own"

What I was asking was, If, in the situation you described, there was no one else around, would you have just walked away? I ask that because it sounds like you would never help a child if you had to do it by yourself.”

Ah right, glad you clarified your unclear point.

Weighing it up I probably would not help in that specific situation. The consequences of coming up against an accusation could be a life-altering and career-ruining.
Sorry if that sounds harsh.
I would make every effort to alert the appropriate staff, or find someone else to help me sort it out. So the idea of 'doing nothing' you threw earlier is erroneous.

But doing it on my own would be a red line for me.

Dole out your opprobrium, I really don't care for the good opinion of randoms on the internet.
Kwazykat61
23-11-2016
deleted
roverboy1965
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Malice Cooper:
“A photo gets put on facebook and twitter with"this filthy &^$&^ just tried to grab my child in (area) share this so we can find out their name" . Within an hour half a million have shared the face and the story. Good luck proving yourself innocent to them”

Perfectly put.

Some may poo-poo that it would happen but it does I've seen it on FB.

Some hysterical parent puts on social media about strange man hanging around etc and within minutes the pitchfork brigade are out looking for him.
muggins14
23-11-2016
I can understand both sides, to be fair to the men on this board who are hesitant about helping a seemingly lost child. It may not be the case that an accusation would definitely result from them helping a lost child, but it is a possibility. Hell, even a teacher taking a microphone from a child at the Thanksgiving production can lead to death threats and potential loss of job and income.

If you're in a crowded place, why aren't other people also concerned and helping - why should the lone male be the only person who potentially can help a lost child? It's not just the men who won't help, people tend to be very unwilling to help strangers these days.

I did see that video of the actress pretending to be a lost child - hardly anybody, male or female, went to help her. People are scared of the ramifications, no matter how much we know it's unlikely to happen - the potential for it happening is enough. We all know how easy it is to smear somebody these days, falsely or otherwise.

Perhaps calling the police about the child and then acting would be a good idea. If you've called before-hand, then it's on record. I think the idea of mentioning it to other people - who presumably are also not helping the child - is another.

We do live in sad times, but it's the world we've created.
Pumping Iron
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by roverboy1965:
“Perfectly put.

Some may poo-poo that it would happen but it does I've seen it on FB.

Some hysterical parent puts on social media about strange man hanging around etc and within minutes the pitchfork brigade are out looking for him.”

You see a lot of strange stuff on FB. Although if you help a child out, you're more likely to be branded a hero on social media, rather than a paedo.
Paul_DNAP
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Harvey_Specter:
“If there was no one else around, who is it that's gonna 'fit you up' on social media?”

Having said that, there is also a version where that lost child is acting as "bait" and there is a verminous vigilante vlogger hiding in a bush ready to leap out with "look at the fat peado talking to the little girl".

Of course the accusation would not stand in court if it ever went so far, but my face on the internet and in the papers, the damage would be well and truly done before I cleared my name, so I don't need that, and the shame would probably kill my poor mum.
Pumping Iron
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Paul_DNAP:
“I put that description in there because that is how the tabloid press would describe me if the parent kicked up a fuss as per the OP as that is almost exactly the same as their one dimensional demographic for paedophiles. So yes, I do not want a daily fail headline "lost child approached by middle aged man in broad daylight" followed by "The 44 year old loner swooped in to talk to the girl mere seconds after she became separated from her mother in the busy shopping center."

There was a thing done a while back, can't recall the full details, but it involved filming a young girl actress pretending to be lost in a shopping center and their angle on the story was along the lines "busy shoppers ignore plight of lost child" and I remember thinking at the time they could have used the exact same footage but shown the times she was approached by men and run with the "dirty old men swarm around lost child" angle. But they did observe that the lost girl was mostly approached by ladies, and noted than men they questioned did mention something like "What? A man of my age talking to a young girl? No way." as I did above.

So yes, with large sections of the news media being so obsessed with seeing a paedo around every corner, I am massively paranoid about how such situations would be perceived should they arise.”

As a parent of a young girl, I would thank you if you helped out my daughter. I would never assume you were a paedophile, only be be very grateful, I'd offer to buy you a few beers or something as a thank-you. Most parents are the same. Stop falling for the stupid tabloids. Nobody gives a damn if you're single, how old you are, that you live in a flat or play games, that's just your own insecurities and paranoia about what others think of you.
Dan Fortesque
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Harvey_Specter:
“I'd rather be treated like an abductor by an angry parent and make sure the child is okay rather than ignore the situation altogether and risk the child's safety.”

Same here. Look at how many people regretted not stepping in to help James Bulger. Not every parent will react like the one in the OP.
Harvey_Specter
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Paul_DNAP:
“Having said that, there is also a version where that lost child is acting as "bait" and there is a verminous vigilante vlogger hiding in a bush ready to leap out with "look at the fat peado talking to the little girl".

Of course the accusation would not stand in court if it ever went so far, but my face on the internet and in the papers, the damage would be well and truly done before I cleared my name, so I don't need that, and the shame would probably kill my poor mum.”

Well im glad you're just passing a day at work rather than being serious.

Fair play, pal.
PoppySeed
23-11-2016
Nothing would stop me from helping out an obviously lost child, even if someone verbally abused me for it, better safe than sorry. I saw a young lad of about 4 in our shopping centre, obviously separated from his family, I gently approached him asking if he'd lost his mummy, stayed with him and his relieved mum thanked me. I think if you just stay put with the child, not take them looking for their parent, as that would freak a parent out, don't hold on to their hand, then the parent will see that you are not going any where with their child but just keeping an eye on them. I'd never forgive myself if I left a lone young child to just get on with it. Several years ago I came across a crying girl of about 7 in a department store, asked her if she'd lost her mum and stayed with her until her mum turned up, her mum just rolled her eyes at her daughter and told me she was always getting lost
Shrike
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by muggins14:
“...I did see that video of the actress pretending to be a lost child - hardly anybody, male or female, went to help her. ...”

It would be a result of the Bystander effect

If someone needs assistance and only one other person is around, its almost certain they will help. That same person when in a crowd will almost certainly hold back, as we assume that someone else will help or is more qualified to help than we are.

A couple of times my car has broken down, nobody leapt out to help me, but both times when I directly asked people for assistance it was given with good grace - effectively I had singled them out from the crowd and so negated the bystander effect. Sadly a lost kid won't know about that and, if anything, has had it drummed into them not to speak to strangers.
anne_666
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Swanandduck2:
“Someone in work is really upset about an incident yesterday. She was in a shopping centre and saw a little boy aged about 3 wandering around on his own. She went over and crouched down and started asking him where his mummy was, and could he point to the shop she was in etc. After a couple of minutes, a woman came along, glared at my colleague, took her child's hand and marched off. My colleague is saying that it's the last time she'll bother to get involved if she's going to be treated like an abductor.

She's not the first person I know who's had that experience, and I think it's really sad. I'm just wondering are some parents so suspicious and hostile that they're actually going to create situations where many people will now think twice about helping a lost child.”

I hope people like this don't put anyone off. A 3 year old shouldn't have been left alone for that length of time. A child's welfare comes first. Adult paranoia and anyone's hurt feelings are irrelevant..
Pumping Iron
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by LuckyPierre:
“Not slim.

There was a thread on here recently - probably only a few pages back so easily traceable if you're so inclined - about a man catching on camera four-lettered abuse and being spat on by a woman who had parked her car in his drive to collect her offspring from school. Though he was filming her and her behaviour, the fact that she had a small child in her arms (and one in the car IIRC) quickly led her to accuse him of filming her children for nefarious reasons.

Those on this thread who think that some people don't think like this are hopelessly naive.

ETA: Found it for you:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2185846”

This has nothing to do with helping a child in distress.
RobinOfLoxley
23-11-2016
I have rescued a 3yr old boy, barefoot and just in Huggies and a T-shirt on my street, early on a Sunday Morning (9.00am'ish)

He thought he would be able to direct me back to his house, but we walked up and down a couple of hundred yards and he couldn't (and was whimpering by now)

So I knocked at a few doors. Got 3 no replies, but the 4th with a houseful of kids was opened by a woman.

I explained the situation and asked her to call the Police.

2 Cop Cars within 5 minutes. I was impressed! One Officer shook my hand and said "Wish we had more like you"


Turns out the boy was staying with Grandparents for the night, but wanted his Mummy, so got a kitchen chair and let himself out the front-door.

Bless


I don't care what the paedo-accusation consequences are. You can't leave a child alone in those circumstances.
Woodbine
23-11-2016
It's a fair question and I can understand people thinking twice about it, but it's probably better to get accused of being an abductor then something bad happening to the kid and having to live with that for the rest of your life.
d'@ve
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by Woodbine:
“It's a fair question and I can understand people thinking twice about it, but it's probably better to get accused of being an abductor then something bad happening to the kid and having to live with that for the rest of your life.”

There's a difference between grabbing a lone kid from say a busy dual carriageway to save his or her life, staying where you are and immediately phoning the police (which I would do... always) - and by myself taking a wandering kid's hand in a busy shopping centre for example (which I would probably not do, even to walk him or her to try and find a security guard). In the latter case, I'd think of another way to help... there are several 'safe' options as mentioned by others. I'd think of another way to help... there are several 'safe' options as mentioned by others. It's not rocket science.

You definitely have to be on the look out for the phone 'video and upload' brigade, something that did not apply years ago though I did once encounter it as long as 5 years ago while walking through a park... and because of that, I chose not to directly help the kid down from a high hedge, I gave advice instead.
TrollHunter
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by roverboy1965:
“Perfectly put.

Some may poo-poo that it would happen but it does I've seen it on FB.

Some hysterical parent puts on social media about strange man hanging around etc and within minutes the pitchfork brigade are out looking for him.”

All the above could happen if you were nowhere near a lost child, so on that basis, would you avoid shopping centres, parks, cinemas, basically anywhere that children may frequent, in order to avoid being perceived as a weird man hanging around?

I must say, the levels of paranoia in this thread is startling.

As for your point about FB, I've seen this many times on a FB group run by parent/s of the local school. "Warning - strange men in white Transit van" turned out to be council workers. "Strange man approaching children" turned out to be someone walking down the street. But when you confront these imbeciles, the usual stock response is, "Well, you can never be too careful".

So while I appreciate there are countless morons out there who would see a completely innocent act of a stranger comforting a lost child and turn it into PAEDOGEDDON, this could very well happen even if you were nowhere near any children, such is the level of hysteria with some people.
TrollHunter
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by d'@ve:
“There's a difference between grabbing a lone kid from say a busy dual carriageway to save his or her life, staying where you are and immediately phoning the police (which I would do... always) - and by myself taking a wandering kid's hand in a busy shopping centre for example (which I would probably not do, even to walk him or her to try and find a security guard). In the latter case, I'd think of another way to help... there are several 'safe' options as mentioned by others. There is no single right or wrong way to deal with these unusual situations.”

I disagree - doing bugger all and walking on by in the hope that someone else will step in is totally wrong.
d'@ve
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by TrollHunter:
“I disagree - doing bugger all and walking on by in the hope that someone else will step in is totally wrong.”

I didn't say or mean that! To be crystal clear, you find a way to help but what you do and how you do it depends on the circumstances. I have modified my post to avoid others who didn't digest the entire post being confused by it.
Woodbine
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by d'@ve:
“There's a difference between grabbing a lone kid from a busy dual carriageway to save his or her life, staying where you are and immediately phoning the police (which I would do... always) and by myself taking a wandering kid's hand in a busy shopping centre for example (which I would probably not do, even to walk him or her to try and find a security guard). In the latter case, I'd think of another way to help... there are several 'safe' options as mentioned by others. It's not rocket science.”

I can see what you're saying, but it's not like you'll be grabbing the kid from the shopping centre and the safer way would be to go and help yourself and not worry about perception.
Turbulence
23-11-2016
Originally Posted by TrollHunter:
“I disagree - doing bugger all and walking on by in the hope that someone else will step in is totally wrong.”

Exactly, I couldn't imagine not doing anything. At the end of the day most parents will be happy that somebody has found their child, and ungrateful arses like the OP mentioned will be in the minority. Generally people have the common sense to know helping a lost toddler is not comparable to approaching an 10 year old girl for directions when there are plenty of adults to ask.
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map