• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
FIFA now intolerant of fans wearing poppies !
<<
<
17 of 17
>>
>
Orchideam
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by GloriaSnockers:
“More than once in the last century, war has emptied the towns and cities of men of fighting age. It didn't pick and choose them on the basis of politics or religion, it took all of them. The poppy has traditionally been a means of recognising the sacrifice of those who didn't come home and of raising funds for those who came back injured and the families who were affected, all with the hope that refusing to forget such horrific times would help to ensure that they never happened again. The logical consequence of all those soldiers coming from all kinds of political and religious backgrounds would be that the people who wore the poppy in support of them did too.

It's only in recent years that the poppy has been hijacked by the BNP and other organizations too short-sighted to recognise the fact that there were many times when our soldiers were fighting to liberate Jews, Polish and others of different nationalities from unspeakable atrocities. In labeling the poppy a political symbol, FIFA are helping to hand it to the likes of the BNP on a plate.

For what it's worth, I've never been an ardent supporter of any political party and have not always voted the same way. I've always worn a poppy though.

I'm not fanatical about it and go about my life as normal, although I'm thankful for the freedoms afforded me by the sacrifices of other people. This year at eleven o'clock on the anniversary of Armistice Day, I was doing my shopping in German supermarket Aldi, who stopped trading for two minutes to remember the fallen.

Shame on you, FIFA. Profiting from other people's compassion for the dead and injured and their families because of this 'rule' - when you made it and can make an exception to it - is just plain ugly.”

Perfectly put, excellent and correct post!

I wear the poppy to respect and remember my uncle, my brother and any and all - most conscripted - servicemen etc who died doing their duty. Are those that grabbed the poppy for their own ends the same that took over the flag of England and made that racist? well, there you go then.
Deep Purple
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“but they have a different opinion to you and they set the rules.

it`s not unacceptable to me, we`ve already been there and i`m not getting back on that ridiculous cycle, i don`t care if they ban the entire sport on, a personal level [or don`t] so you`re asking the wrong person.”

So you think it is okay that Fifa can fine us because spectators are wearing poppies? Seriously?

They set the rules that political badges cannot be worn. There is a clear definition of what the poppy stands for, and it isn't political.
Deep Purple
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by GloriaSnockers:
“More than once in the last century, war has emptied the towns and cities of men of fighting age. It didn't pick and choose them on the basis of politics or religion, it took all of them. The poppy has traditionally been a means of recognising the sacrifice of those who didn't come home and of raising funds for those who came back injured and the families who were affected, all with the hope that refusing to forget such horrific times would help to ensure that they never happened again. The logical consequence of all those soldiers coming from all kinds of political and religious backgrounds would be that the people who wore the poppy in support of them did too.

It's only in recent years that the poppy has been hijacked by the BNP and other organizations too short-sighted to recognise the fact that there were many times when our soldiers were fighting to liberate Jews, Polish and others of different nationalities from unspeakable atrocities. In labeling the poppy a political symbol, FIFA are helping to hand it to the likes of the BNP on a plate.

For what it's worth, I've never been an ardent supporter of any political party and have not always voted the same way. I've always worn a poppy though.

I'm not fanatical about it and go about my life as normal, although I'm thankful for the freedoms afforded me by the sacrifices of other people. This year at eleven o'clock on the anniversary of Armistice Day, I was doing my shopping in German supermarket Aldi, who stopped trading for two minutes to remember the fallen.

Shame on you, FIFA. Profiting from other people's compassion for the dead and injured and their families because of this 'rule' - when you made it and can make an exception to it - is just plain ugly.”

Well said. That's exactly what it's all about.
annette kurten
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“So you think it is okay that Fifa can fine us because spectators are wearing poppies? Seriously?

They set the rules that political badges cannot be worn. There is a clear definition of what the poppy stands for, and it isn't political.”

why are you feigning disbelief, we`ve had these words countless times in this thread already and you know what my opinion is on it.
blueblade
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by GloriaSnockers:
“More than once in the last century, war has emptied the towns and cities of men of fighting age. It didn't pick and choose them on the basis of politics or religion, it took all of them. The poppy has traditionally been a means of recognising the sacrifice of those who didn't come home and of raising funds for those who came back injured and the families who were affected, all with the hope that refusing to forget such horrific times would help to ensure that they never happened again. The logical consequence of all those soldiers coming from all kinds of political and religious backgrounds would be that the people who wore the poppy in support of them did too.

It's only in recent years that the poppy has been hijacked by the BNP and other organizations too short-sighted to recognise the fact that there were many times when our soldiers were fighting to liberate Jews, Polish and others of different nationalities from unspeakable atrocities. In labeling the poppy a political symbol, FIFA are helping to hand it to the likes of the BNP on a plate.

For what it's worth, I've never been an ardent supporter of any political party and have not always voted the same way. I've always worn a poppy though.

I'm not fanatical about it and go about my life as normal, although I'm thankful for the freedoms afforded me by the sacrifices of other people. This year at eleven o'clock on the anniversary of Armistice Day, I was doing my shopping in German supermarket Aldi, who stopped trading for two minutes to remember the fallen.

Shame on you, FIFA. Profiting from other people's compassion for the dead and injured and their families because of this 'rule' - when you made it and can make an exception to it - is just plain ugly.”

Excellent post. Very well said.
GPW
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by GloriaSnockers:
“More than once in the last century, war has emptied the towns and cities of men of fighting age. It didn't pick and choose them on the basis of politics or religion, it took all of them. The poppy has traditionally been a means of recognising the sacrifice of those who didn't come home and of raising funds for those who came back injured and the families who were affected, all with the hope that refusing to forget such horrific times would help to ensure that they never happened again. The logical consequence of all those soldiers coming from all kinds of political and religious backgrounds would be that the people who wore the poppy in support of them did too.

It's only in recent years that the poppy has been hijacked by the BNP and other organizations too short-sighted to recognise the fact that there were many times when our soldiers were fighting to liberate Jews, Polish and others of different nationalities from unspeakable atrocities. In labeling the poppy a political symbol, FIFA are helping to hand it to the likes of the BNP on a plate.

For what it's worth, I've never been an ardent supporter of any political party and have not always voted the same way. I've always worn a poppy though.

I'm not fanatical about it and go about my life as normal, although I'm thankful for the freedoms afforded me by the sacrifices of other people. This year at eleven o'clock on the anniversary of Armistice Day, I was doing my shopping in German supermarket Aldi, who stopped trading for two minutes to remember the fallen.

Shame on you, FIFA. Profiting from other people's compassion for the dead and injured and their families because of this 'rule' - when you made it and can make an exception to it - is just plain ugly.”

I salute you.
Cornish_Piskie
19-12-2016
What the Poppy Police on this, and other threads fail to see, is that this is not all about us. This, as far as FIFA are concerned, is about the wider global picture and setting a precedent that others will exploit with distinctly dishonourable intentions. And they will claim that their cause is an exception to the rule too.

We have become so inward looking and introspective we no longer see that there is a world out there. The game of football is global and what FIFA allows one country to do, can open a whole pandoras box of trouble.

Would, say, Americans be happy having to play against an Iranian team wearing an emblem that "honours the Martyrs of Islam".... who Americans see as 9/11 terrorists.

The British go completely gaga at the first sign of a poppy. We just completely lose all reason and see nothing beyond the tips of our noses. We are utterly, utterly blinkered where this thing is concerned and we genuinely, truly, totally believe that we and we alone have a God-given right to automatic exemption from any rule that is seen in any way as preventing us from our ritual on-your-knees worship of this emblem.

But of course, as in all matters 'poppy', it is good old Blighty that is the only one marching in step. Everybody else is out of step.

The FIFA rule on political symbols is a proper and sensible one. And regardless of what we think about it's "politicality", there is no doubting that beyond the shores of our realm, the rest of the world DOES see it as political.

We are not the special case we think we are.
annette kurten
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Cornish_Piskie:
“What the Poppy Police on this, and other threads fail to see, is that this is not all about us. This, as far as FIFA are concerned, is about the wider global picture and setting a precedent that others will exploit with distinctly dishonourable intentions. And they will claim that their cause is an exception to the rule too.

We have become so inward looking and introspective we no longer see that there is a world out there. The game of football is global and what FIFA allows one country to do, can open a whole pandoras box of trouble.

Would, say, Americans be happy having to play against an Iranian team wearing an emblem that "honours the Martyrs of Islam".... who Americans see as 9/11 terrorists.

The British go completely gaga at the first sign of a poppy. We just completely lose all reason and see nothing beyond the tips of our noses. We are utterly, utterly blinkered where this thing is concerned and we genuinely, truly, totally believe that we and we alone have a God-given right to automatic exemption from any rule that is seen in any way as preventing us from our ritual on-your-knees worship of this emblem.

But of course, as in all matters 'poppy', it is good old Blighty that is the only one marching in step. Everybody else is out of step.

The FIFA rule on political symbols is a proper and sensible one. And regardless of what we think about it's "politicality", there is no doubting that beyond the shores of our realm, the rest of the world DOES see it as political.

We are not the special case we think we are.”

good luck.

there`s some kind of weird, arrogant, blindness that descends over football fans.
blueblade
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Cornish_Piskie:
“What the Poppy Police on this, and other threads fail to see, is that this is not all about us. This, as far as FIFA are concerned, is about the wider global picture and setting a precedent that others will exploit with distinctly dishonourable intentions. And they will claim that their cause is an exception to the rule too.

We have become so inward looking and introspective we no longer see that there is a world out there. The game of football is global and what FIFA allows one country to do, can open a whole pandoras box of trouble.

Would, say, Americans be happy having to play against an Iranian team wearing an emblem that "honours the Martyrs of Islam".... who Americans see as 9/11 terrorists.

The British go completely gaga at the first sign of a poppy. We just completely lose all reason and see nothing beyond the tips of our noses. We are utterly, utterly blinkered where this thing is concerned and we genuinely, truly, totally believe that we and we alone have a God-given right to automatic exemption from any rule that is seen in any way as preventing us from our ritual on-your-knees worship of this emblem.

But of course, as in all matters 'poppy', it is good old Blighty that is the only one marching in step. Everybody else is out of step.

The FIFA rule on political symbols is a proper and sensible one. And regardless of what we think about it's "politicality", there is no doubting that beyond the shores of our realm, the rest of the world DOES see it as political.

We are not the special case we think we are.”

Then perhaps FIFA can present a written case explaining why they believe it's a political symbol. They can also explain why they are dictating to fans what they can and cannot wear and display in the stadium. I'm sure that wouldn't be outwith their collective intellect - hopefully not anyway.

Sorry, but if a rule, or rather the interpretation of a rule, is shite then it should be challenged, and this one is. We shouldn't bow down to some tuppeny ha'penny corrupt little outfit and accept everything they say, just because they say it. Sod that.
annette kurten
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Then perhaps FIFA can present a written case explaining why they believe it's a political symbol. They can also explain why they are dictating to fans what they can and cannot wear and display in the stadium. I'm sure that wouldn't be outwith their collective intellect - hopefully not anyway.

Sorry, but if a rule is shite then it should be challenged, and this one is. We shouldn't bow down to some tuppeny ha'penny corrupt little outfit and accept everything they say, just because they say it. Sod that.”

have you emailed them or set up a petition or anything? they might not be reading this.
blueblade
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“have you emailed them or set up a petition or anything? they might not be reading this.”

I don't need to. I'm pretty sure the home country's FA's will be doing so, or similar, in their appeals.

In the meantime three cheers for the PM - link


Quote:
“Theresa May has condemned the “utterly outrageous” ban on England and Scotland players displaying poppies during next week’s Remembrance Day clash.

The Prime Minister launched a blistering attack on football’s governing body Fifa, which has turned down a request because of its strict restrictions on symbols on shirts.

To huge cheers in the Commons, Ms May turned on Fifa for “telling us what to do” when it has been mired in its own long-running corruption scandal.”

dearmrman
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“I don't need to. I'm pretty sure the home country's FA's will be doing so, or similar, in their appeals.

In the meantime three cheers for the PM - link”

And it's not political....
annette kurten
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“I don't need to. I'm pretty sure the home country's FA's will be doing so, or similar, in their appeals.

In the meantime three cheers for the PM - link”

so despite your ranting on here you`re actually not that bothered.

on a scale of 1 to 10 how political would you say the office of prime minister is?
blueblade
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by dearmrman:
“And it's not political....”

No, but then the PM can comment on matters not political, and does so.
dearmrman
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“No, but then the PM can comment on matters not political, and does so.”

And in the commons...sorry your non political argument is lost.
Deep Purple
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by dearmrman:
“And in the commons...sorry your non political argument is lost.”

Just because a politician comments on something doesn't mean what they're talking about automatically becomes a political symbol.

I remember Harold Wilson talking about The Beatles.
Deep Purple
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Cornish_Piskie:
“What the Poppy Police on this, and other threads fail to see, is that this is not all about us. This, as far as FIFA are concerned, is about the wider global picture and setting a precedent that others will exploit with distinctly dishonourable intentions. And they will claim that their cause is an exception to the rule too.

We have become so inward looking and introspective we no longer see that there is a world out there. The game of football is global and what FIFA allows one country to do, can open a whole pandoras box of trouble.

Would, say, Americans be happy having to play against an Iranian team wearing an emblem that "honours the Martyrs of Islam".... who Americans see as 9/11 terrorists.

The British go completely gaga at the first sign of a poppy. We just completely lose all reason and see nothing beyond the tips of our noses. We are utterly, utterly blinkered where this thing is concerned and we genuinely, truly, totally believe that we and we alone have a God-given right to automatic exemption from any rule that is seen in any way as preventing us from our ritual on-your-knees worship of this emblem.

But of course, as in all matters 'poppy', it is good old Blighty that is the only one marching in step. Everybody else is out of step.

The FIFA rule on political symbols is a proper and sensible one. And regardless of what we think about it's "politicality", there is no doubting that beyond the shores of our realm, the rest of the world DOES see it as political.

We are not the special case we think we are.”

You seem to be suggesting that FIFA are honourable people who only want to do the right thing.

Of course, fining us for our fans wearing the poppy is right, whilst at the same time they award the world cup to Russia and Qatar. Obviously those awards were all above board.

Does that mean all other sports are bad for not caring about the poppy being worn?

Your example of Islamic honours, which doesn't exist anyway, is ridiculous, because that is honouring killers, whereas the poppy isn't.
TerraCanis
19-12-2016
The best thing would be to just not pay the "fines" and have nothing further to do with FIFA.
hyperstarsponge
19-12-2016
You don't have to watch or see the world cup you know.
Eurostar
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Cornish_Piskie:
“What the Poppy Police on this, and other threads fail to see, is that this is not all about us. This, as far as FIFA are concerned, is about the wider global picture and setting a precedent that others will exploit with distinctly dishonourable intentions. And they will claim that their cause is an exception to the rule too.

We have become so inward looking and introspective we no longer see that there is a world out there. The game of football is global and what FIFA allows one country to do, can open a whole pandoras box of trouble.

Would, say, Americans be happy having to play against an Iranian team wearing an emblem that "honours the Martyrs of Islam".... who Americans see as 9/11 terrorists.

The British go completely gaga at the first sign of a poppy. We just completely lose all reason and see nothing beyond the tips of our noses. We are utterly, utterly blinkered where this thing is concerned and we genuinely, truly, totally believe that we and we alone have a God-given right to automatic exemption from any rule that is seen in any way as preventing us from our ritual on-your-knees worship of this emblem.

But of course, as in all matters 'poppy', it is good old Blighty that is the only one marching in step. Everybody else is out of step.

The FIFA rule on political symbols is a proper and sensible one. And regardless of what we think about it's "politicality", there is no doubting that beyond the shores of our realm, the rest of the world DOES see it as political.

We are not the special case we think we are.”

Before the England- Scotland match, the FA held a miltary ceremony with serving soldiers in uniform on the pitch, wreaths being laid and the Last Post being sounded. I'm surprised that people cannot see this would be very problematic for FIFA in the context of it being a sporting occasion held under their rules.
blueblade
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by Eurostar:
“Before the England- Scotland match, the FA held a miltary ceremony with serving soldiers in uniform on the pitch, wreaths being laid and the Last Post being sounded. I'm surprised that people cannot see this would be very problematic for FIFA in the context of it being a sporting occasion held under their rules.”

No, not at all. Why should they have a problem with it. Their rules state no political symbols - commemorating those who lost their lives is not political.
blueblade
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by dearmrman:
“And in the commons...sorry your non political argument is lost.”

Any amount of discussion in the commons does not make the poppy a political symbol, any more than the PM expressing sympathy for the victims of a natural disaster makes that disaster a poltical event.
Deep Purple
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Any amount of discussion in the commons does not make the poppy a political symbol, any more than the PM expressing sympathy for the victims of a natural disaster makes that disaster a poltical event.”

Exactly.

This is the definition from the British Legion, and this is what it has been about for 100 years.

Quote:
“The poppy is

A symbol of Remembrance and hope
Worn by millions of people
Red because of the natural colour of field poppies

The poppy is NOT

A symbol of death or a sign of support for war
A reflection of politics or religion
Red to reflect the colour of blood”

GloriaSnockers
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“Just because a politician comments on something doesn't mean what they're talking about automatically becomes a political symbol.

I remember Harold Wilson talking about The Beatles.”

Agreed. There was no opposition to the PM's comments - not one person stood up to present a counter-argument. The incident hardly positioned the poppy in the centre of a political debate.
<<
<
17 of 17
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map