• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
FIFA now intolerant of fans wearing poppies !
<<
<
4 of 17
>>
>
blueblade
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“fifa STILL have a duty to perform whether you agree with the ban or you don`t and poppies ARE inflammatory at matches.”

No they are not inflammatory. The only people who ever got worked up about them were a tiny group of ISIS supporters a few years ago.

Quote:
“there`s not really much more to say really other than fifa are responding to the behaviour of twatty supporters.”

How dare they follow their conscience, stick two fingers up at a totally dishonest, corrupt organisation, and honour our war dead. The nerve of these people.
blueblade
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“I think you'll find the reverse is the case. I dont hate the Irish. I despair at the endless hatred that comes from your end generation after generation, because of the past, and a refusal to live life by todays standards. This is a similar tract to the extremist Islamic groups who will carry on the hatred for ever.

You also think it is your right to abuse the English at will, without anything in return.

I dont hate the Irish, but I hate the extremists who carry on this endless campaign of anti Britishness.”

They'll never let it go DP. I mean the loyalists in the North still babble on about King Billy beating King James in 16 bloody 89 or however many centuries it was ago. I think long standing grudges goes with the territory.
MinnieMinz
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“I dont think bringing up a group of IRA lovers is justification that the poppy will cause football violence. This lot hate us full stop, whether we have poppies or not.”

Also this. I'm not sure what's happening today, you and Blueblade are talking a lot of sense. Have you two had extra wheetabix this morning?
blueblade
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by MinnieMinz:
“Also this. I'm not sure what's happening today, you and Blueblade are talking a lot of sense. Have you two had extra wheetabix this morning?
”

Ironically enough, on most subjects we actually agree 100% MM.

Thanks anyway.
annette kurten
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by MinnieMinz:
“There's a lot more to say actually. Change the poppy for a ISIS flag. Now a few supporters are waving that flag, so does FIFA then ban all flags? does it hell. There is no difference in connotation whatsoever.”

i`ll keep it simple:

football violence has long been a serious problem.

a few decades ago the powers that be quite rightly clamped down hard upon it.

poppies have been demonstrated to be incendiary at football matches.

this thread is about banning poppies.

fifa can ban all the flags and flowers it wishes for all i care.

i hope that clarifies.
MinnieMinz
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“i`ll keep it simple:

football violence has long been a serious problem.

a few decades ago the powers that be quite rightly clamped down hard upon it.

poppies have been demonstrated to be incendiary at football matches.

this thread is about banning poppies.

fifa can ban all the flags and flowers it wishes for all i care.

i hope that clarifies.”

I'll also keep it simple.

The poppy is not an aggressive symbol.

The few idiots using it as such, shouldn't be allowed to dictate to the rest.

Football violence mainly stems from interclub rivalry from a few knuckleheads, not the poppy.
annette kurten
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by MinnieMinz:
“I'll also keep it simple.

The poppy is not an aggressive symbol.

The few ***** using it, shouldn't be allowed to dictate to the rest.

Football violence mainly stains from interclub rivalry from a few knuckleheads not the poppy.”

the shoulds and shouldn`ts of what the children are doing in the schoolyard are not my point.

my point is that the industry is, should and needs to be eliminating violence as much and robustly as possible, it is a global problem that is again on the rise.

and it needs to be seen to be doing it.

if the children cannot play nicely we take the toys away.
Deep Purple
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“fifa STILL have a duty to perform whether you agree with the ban or you don`t and poppies ARE inflammatory at matches.

there`s not really much more to say really other than fifa are responding to the behaviour of twatty supporters.”

Fifa are doing no such thing. They are using an opportunity to have a go at England in the main, because the English media caused them so much bad publicity over the years, and they have not liked the English FA over the years either.

Poppies have not caused any football violence, and poppies are not a political symbol, so therefore not in breach of the rules. Fifa, and too many people at home, are trying to change what it is, and the majority are not having it.
MinnieMinz
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“the shoulds and shouldn`ts of what the children are doing in the schoolyard are not my point.

my point is that the industry is, should and needs to be eliminating violence as much and robustly as possible, it is a global problem that is again on the rise.

and it needs to be seen to be doing it.

if the children cannot play nicely we take the toys away.”

I beg to differ, it seems to be your only point. Football violence was horrific in the 70s and 80s, worse than now. What was to blame then? you say you're not bothered about what the children in the playground are doing, but it's your whole stance. FIFA are punishing the British for exposing the internal and external bribes. In any petty way they can, and dressing it up as containing football violence. It's both insulting and ridiculous.

If what you say is grounds for banning it, then by that token all flags would be banned from matches because of the few idiots waving ISIS flags. It's a valid point, why don't you attempt to answer it.
dosanjh1
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Angry about what?

The only thing I'm angry about are the self righteous officials at FIFA who seem determined to stifle any form of tradition and spit on our war dead by trying to ban fans from wearing a poppy.

As far as me being a self righteous hypocrite for supporting my fellow countrymen in commemorating our war dead - utter crap. Corbyn can do as he chooses. If he doesn't wear a poppy then he won't be prosecuted for it. Which is a damn sight more freedom than some countries have.”

Your utterly missing the point.

Your a hypocrite if on the one hand you don't complain about the media and the government using it as a political symbol but then complain when FIFA treat as such.
annette kurten
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by MinnieMinz:
“I beg to differ, it seems to be your only point. Football violence was horrific in the 70s and 80s, worse than now. What was to blame then? you say you're not bothered about what the children in the playground are doing, but it's your whole stance. FIFA are punishing the British for exposing the internal and external bribes. In any petty way they can, and dressing it up as containing football violence. It's both insulting and ridiculous.

If what you say is grounds for banning it, then by that token all flags would be banned from matches because of the few idiots waving ISIS flags. It's a valid point, why don't you attempt to answer it.”

yes, that`s what i said and i`m sorry that you still can`t grasp it, the rest is completely irrelevant to my only point.

i`m sorry it`s a wooooooosh i`ve already explained it as simply as i can.
Union Jock
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“fifa STILL have a duty to perform whether you agree with the ban or you don`t and poppies ARE inflammatory at matches.

there`s not really much more to say really other than fifa are responding to the behaviour of twatty supporters.”

No they're not, it's just a few idiots and from what I recall ISIS supporters so sort them out.
blueblade
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by dosanjh1:
“Your utterly missing the point.

Your a hypocrite if on the one hand you don't complain about the media and the government using it as a political symbol but then complain when FIFA treat as such.”

No I'm not missing any point. The difference is that neither the government nor the media is telling me that I can't wear a poppy at a football match, whereas an utterly corrupt organisation is.

and stop calling me a hypocrite, mate. It's really starting to piss me off.
dosanjh1
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“No I'm not missing any point. The difference is that neither the government nor the media is telling me that I can't wear a poppy at a football match, whereas an utterly corrupt organisation is.

and stop calling me a hypocrite, mate. It's really starting to piss me off.”

I have to call a spade a spade. You've failed to acknowledge my point about the poppy being used In political manner so you leave me no choice..
rathcoole_kai
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“i`ll keep it simple:

football violence has long been a serious problem.

a few decades ago the powers that be quite rightly clamped down hard upon it.

poppies have been demonstrated to be incendiary at football matches.

.

fifa can ban


Poppies cacn certanly be incendiary at places like the Piggery.
AKA Parkhead/Celtic Park.
You as a wannabe Nationislt Republican get offended by things British.
Maybe not by Her Majesty the Queen on your notes.


FIFA can ban sod all I choice to wear.






i hope that clarifies.”

I hope that clarifies.
annette kurten
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by rathcoole_kai:
“I hope that clarifies.”

are you 12?
muggins14
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Roesia:
“I wish he'd terminate the Suites who make these decisions. ”

Yes, although I blame the sofa - the armchair is innocent

Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Rubbish - they can debate it till the cows come home. This goes way above present day Westminster characters. The act is not political and never has been since its inception. It is to honour the millions of dead from two world wars and the many thousands who've died since. That is NOT political, and to suggest that it is, is a gross insult to all those who laid down their lives.

I agree with the posters who suggested that a breakaway organisation be formed to represent countries who feel that FIFA is no longer fit for purpose as a governing body for world football.”

Totally agree.
Deep Purple
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by dosanjh1:
“I have to call a spade a spade. You've failed to acknowledge my point about the poppy being used In political manner so you leave me no choice..”

Just because some idiots try to make it political doesn't mean it is. The vast majority see it as what it is intended for.
dosanjh1
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“Just because some idiots try to make it political doesn't mean it is. The vast majority see it as what it is intended for.”

I remember the outcry when Miliband didn't write his own card. Almost every talking head condemned him. They're probably the same morons who object to FIFAs position.
blueblade
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by dosanjh1:
“I have to call a spade a spade. You've failed to acknowledge my point about the poppy being used In political manner so you leave me no choice..”

Your point is totally irrelevant.

I won't descend into the default sneering leftie stance of dishing out personal insults to those who have the nerve to disagree with them, although with you it would be very easy.
sorcha_healy27
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Dub2:
“Perhaps from people who consider themselves victims of British military aggression?”

That's their problem then and anyone who attacks a poppy wearer for that reason should be dealt with by the law.
sorcha_healy27
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“The Irish again. We know we'll never do anything right for the likes of you.”

Will you ever stop making inflammatory comments about the Irish
sorcha_healy27
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“I think you'll find the reverse is the case. I dont hate the Irish. I despair at the endless hatred that comes from your end generation after generation, because of the past, and a refusal to live life by todays standards. This is a similar tract to the extremist Islamic groups who will carry on the hatred for ever.

You also think it is your right to abuse the English at will, without anything in return.

I dont hate the Irish, but I hate the extremists who carry on this endless campaign of anti Britishness.”

So you think all irish feel this way do you

You hate people making generalisations about the British yet it's fine for you to make sweeping generalisations aboutthe irish.
Union Jock
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“So you think all irish feel this way do you

You hate people making generalisations about the British yet it's fine for you to make sweeping generalisations about the irish.”

BIB, maybe you missed the last sentence in the post you replied to?
sorcha_healy27
24-11-2016
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“They'll never let it go DP. I mean the loyalists in the North still babble on about King Billy beating King James in 16 bloody 89 or however many centuries it was ago. I think long standing grudges goes with the territory.”

Excuse me but loyalists are not irish nor do all irish people hate the English
<<
<
4 of 17
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map