|
||||||||
Is Sean O'Connor out to ruin EE? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,561
|
Quote:
As someone who actually watched EastEnders in the 80's and 90's, let me assure you it was never this dull and uneventful. The first 50 or so episodes are on EastEnders' Youtube channel if you want to check for yourself. Don't believe the people who say SOC is taking it back to basics. This is not EastEnders returning to its roots.
That said, the Santer era bored me senseless but seems to be lauded on here. Santer must have put out about 30 enjoyable episodes in his time and the rest were as boring as SOC's output. ![]() The last time i truley enjoyed EastEnders though and found it unmissable, was the Chrissie/Zoe/Kim Medcalfs Sam. (why the **** did they bring back Daniella??!! ![]() ) Dirty Den saga.Have so many great memorys from that era. Cannot believe the crap thats being served up now. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Down Saaf
Posts: 10,373
|
Quote:
This forum is hilarious.
DTC is ruining EE!! omg like so unrealistic. Oh my gaaaawwwd the Lucy story is sooooooo booooring! New Producer comes: Omg Sean O Connor is ruining EE! it's sooooo boring. Nothing is happening. They're being nice to each other!!! blow something up, omg bring back DTC In short, EastEnders will never win whatever direction it goes in, not on here anyways. Quote:
I totally agree- the fact that there is no news on the horizon about new characters is frustrating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,301
|
Quote:
I agree totally i think people on here are in denial, i also think this should be nipped in the bud and SOC needs to go because this is awful, he's changed the structure of the show completely it just feels like a dull afternoon tv soap. People say wait until christmas but nothing will change dramatically because this is how he wants it, his ideas are totally out of touch for 2016, this aint the 80's ma man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,091
|
Quote:
I can hardly bring myself to watch any more, its become so dull that is feels like a chore.
As for SOC not giving a interview, I get what others are saying he doesn't have to give one and I don't want any big false promises that can't be delivered either. However I think the reason why people are getting frustrated is not neccassarily they want spoilers or big declarations. It would just be interesting to hear what kind of direction he wants to take the show in. Granted, it may translate on screen differently, for better or worse, but seeing he is going to be at the helm for approximately 2-3 years, it would be interesting to hear what kind of vision he has so we can at least get some kind of feel for him as a producer. I also agree with others that xmas and January to march tell us if he is truely a good fit for the show. Yeah the first 6 months haven't been great but it's still early days. Next year will be the telling point. I'd personally love to see this forum buzzing about EE again. Not since the days of santer has that happened. I know he had his critics but at least he got everyone talking about the show for all of the right reasons and that there was a general mix of good storylines and characters at the time. There was always a storyline worth talking about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 855
|
I preferred DTC. I feel SOC has axed too many characters that might have had potential (Belinda, Kyle, Les, Pam, Ronnie, Roxy, Claudette, Aunt Babe) and some of the stories are not that exciting like bin gate and Shaki keep trying to force Bex into bed. Some of the episodes seems slow. That being said Lee's depression story is being handled better as he is trying to keep up the facade of the perfect job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,672
|
Quote:
I preferred DTC. I feel SOC has axed too many characters that might have had potential (Belinda, Kyle, Les, Pam, Ronnie, Roxy, Claudette, Aunt Babe) and some of the stories are not that exciting like bin gate and Shaki keep trying to force Bex into bed. Some of the episodes seems slow. That being said Lee's depression story is being handled better as he is trying to keep up the facade of the perfect job.
Bsbe is still in the show - not sure when she leaves but some charactrrs are still there that should have been axed |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,397
|
Wow, a lot of negativity! Then again, I've not watched in months - the last straw for me was that utterly farcical excuse for a tax payer funded programme that was Grant's return being turned into yet another secret son 20 year delayed baby plot (because we just had to have one every week under DTC).
No better I take it? Shame. But come on guys. Ronnie and Roxy have needed to go for years. It's just the same thing over and over with them. Ronnie is just repulsive and not the flawed deep character she used to be, and Roxy hasn't developed a smidgen in ten years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 585
|
Agreed. Roxy has regressed into an embarrassing, drug smuggling, snivelling, directionless, failed mother who has no gravitas of her personal situation. She's made to loos a terrible parent by Jack for crying out loud! Bin her ASAP.
Ronnie is a severely damaged, creepy black widow who has the capacity for inflicting great pain on someone who has crossed her yet tries to create an illusion that she's a mother and wife who's in control. She cares only for herself. She took Kat's baby and this sort of act makes me want her to be bombed out too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 586
|
Quote:
Wow, a lot of negativity! Then again, I've not watched in months - the last straw for me was that utterly farcical excuse for a tax payer funded programme that was Grant's return being turned into yet another secret son 20 year delayed baby plot (because we just had to have one every week under DTC).
No better I take it? Shame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,119
|
Calling this the worst era for EE is hyperbolic nonsense. His actual sl's only started in September (he oversaw DTC's final plots which were largely pants). Don't conveniently forget the the damage done by Kirkwood and the boredom of Newman. Not to mention how inconsistent DTC was after the 30th anniversary stuff (he was brilliant until the end of February 2015, then it became a mixed bag of very good and very poor).
IF SOC delivers big at Xmas and NY I can imagine the tone will change a lot. If he doesn't do something dramatic, however, I'll happily agree that he hasn't brought the goods. Any indications of ratings under SOC? Of course excluding when the football's on ITV. Particularly Mondays and Tuesdays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
Any indications of ratings under SOC? Of course excluding when the football's on ITV. Particularly Mondays and Tuesdays.
Monday - 6.203 (28%) Tuesday - 6.071 (30%) For comparison, this is what the ratings were this time last year (Mon 23rd Nov 2015) Eastenders 6.05m (26.1%) So yeah, the ratings could be higher, but they're not apocalyptically bad, either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,764
|
Quote:
Santer was VERY hit and miss for me, he did well at the start of his era, and i'm glad he introduced Ronnie & Roxy to the Mitchell family, god knows what he thinks of this new producer killing them off
![]() The last time i truley enjoyed EastEnders though and found it unmissable, was the Chrissie/Zoe/Kim Medcalfs Sam. (why the **** did they bring back Daniella??!! ![]() ) Dirty Den saga.Have so many great memorys from that era. Cannot believe the crap thats being served up now. I think people are just going to keep watching out of habit and because it's on at a convenient time. I don't think the quality is even a factor in the ratings anymore. If it was EastEnders would have ended years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,119
|
Quote:
Monday and Tuesday just gone;
Monday - 6.203 (28%) Tuesday - 6.071 (30%) For comparison, this is what the ratings were this time last year (Mon 23rd Nov 2015) Eastenders 6.05m (26.1%) So yeah, the ratings could be higher, but they're not apocalyptically bad, either. The ratings REALLY dipped around 2004 I think, and possibly 2013 as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,735
|
Quote:
I am not sure if Belinda, Claudette & Babe were axed.
Bsbe is still in the show - not sure when she leaves but some charactrrs are still there that should have been axed |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,561
|
Quote:
Monday and Tuesday just gone;
Monday - 6.203 (28%) Tuesday - 6.071 (30%) For comparison, this is what the ratings were this time last year (Mon 23rd Nov 2015) Eastenders 6.05m (26.1%) So yeah, the ratings could be higher, but they're not apocalyptically bad, either. What are they in comparison to Emmerdale out of interest? I cant imagine the BBC panicing yet, i think it would take months for EastEnders to stay in its current state before people switch off and we see a noticeable dip in ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,672
|
Quote:
BIB The 3 of them were axed, SOC's decision
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
You need to care for the characters and have good stories. Ultimately you cannot have one without the other.
The odd episode I have seen has not bored me but neither has it inspired me to watch the next episode. The real test will be December and January. By February 1st it will be obvious how the wind is blowing as he will of had 6 months, his first Christmas and some major exits. Who is the head storyline producer now? Perhaps they are out of their depth? Especially if this SOC fella ripped up stories without having others in place. The show isn't being helped by the fact that uninspiring characters are headlining the main running storylines at present. Then there is Phil whose story is hard to get behind as it is obvious he will get his transplant. Perhaps it wouldn't be so obvious if we didn't know Ronnie & Roxy were leaving but sadly a number of us do. Whether Phil gets one of his cousins' livers or not, the simple truth is that they are not going to write out Phil, Ronnie and Roxy within months of each other and within months of killing off Peggy. I love Jay and Ben but they are not ready to lead the Mitchell family. Also they need to either bring a new family or build some families up before they continue to dismantle the Mitchells. Even the awful Carters are depleting. So no way is Phil going unless this producer is a total fool. SOC has his work cut out. I'm fine with what he's doing so far, except for his anointing Denise as a mother of a Mitchell child. I'm no fan of Denise at all. Like Ronnie, she's a character who lost relevance in 2010, and everything they've tried with her until now has either been a failure, or when it hasn't been (cougar attractions to Fatboy and Kush), they've been short-lived and unfulfilling. It seems that the only way they can make this character relevant is by linking her - and by extension, her mostly awful family - to the Mitchells; and that, for me, has been the producer's biggest mistake. If he has balls enough to axe the Mitchell sisters, he should have balls enough to call time on Denise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
I wonder if Simon Ashdown could come in as Producer, all his episodes were good.
Ashdown loved and lived for the Brannings. Too much of them got old fast. It's bad enough that this producer seems to be linking everyone and everything to the Mitchells. THAT will all end in tears. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,735
|
Quote:
I thought Carli Norris said she was returning as Belinda in 2017?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
These ratings actually seem OK in the grand scheme of things.
What are they in comparison to Emmerdale out of interest? I cant imagine the BBC panicing yet, i think it would take months for EastEnders to stay in its current state before people switch off and we see a noticeable dip in ratings. Monday 6.55 33.0% Tuesday 6.39 33.0% I should say that I don't think people should get too hung up on ratings (especially overnights). I only posted them because I'd noticed on other threads that some posters had convinced themselves that ratings had nosedived since SOC took over, which obviously isn't the case. They've been fairly stable all autumn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 586
|
The ratings for November 7- November 13 (Masood's leaving week):
Monday: 7.2 million Tuesday: 7.3 million Thursday: 6.8 million Source: Official Barb Hardly disaster. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 285
|
Whilst it is not edge of seat viewing at the moment, the hysteria whipped up in this thread and those similar is ridiculous.
Yes, the storylines aren't on fire right now, and there should be a bit more going on, but there's little wrong with the quality of the individual episodes. Mostly, they are well written, with believable interactions between characters. It just seems like it's the glue between episodes that we are waiting for (note, waiting for, not gone forever) and when that comes, the show should be pretty solid, thanks to the change in writing style humanising most of the characters again. The opposite seemed to be happening during Santer-Dtc. The glue was there, but not the believable foundations, so rarely did anything seem real or gritty, no matter how dramatic. It was as if the show was living through doof-doof moments (Stacey's return week being the most irritatingly obvious) and the core of the episodes and the characters, were an afterthought. The show cannot carry on like it is now forever, absolutely not, but those claiming this is 'the worst I've ever seen EE', or 'Soc is writing for the 80's/90's' need a reality check. SOC inherited the show in a very poor state, as Dtc did in 2013, BUT instead of papering over the cracks by instantly throwing big storylines at damaged characters, thus destroying them further, there's been a determined and successful effort to repair and re-humanise the characters through the more realistic and mundane moments. Now, when the drama does come knocking (and we ALL know it will, as much as a certain few love to pretend EE is being deliberately sabotaged), the pay off will be much greater. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
Emmerdale for last Monday and Tuesday
Monday 6.55 33.0% Tuesday 6.39 33.0% I should say that I don't think people should get too hung up on ratings (especially overnights). I only posted them because I'd noticed on other threads that some posters had convinced themselves that ratings had nosedived since SOC took over, which obviously isn't the case. They've been fairly stable all autumn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,357
|
It's quiet.
SOC is not the worse producer ever, you cannot even begin to pin that title on him after less then a few months. There probably not been a revered producer in years, everyone has been slated once and awhile. Santer left the show in a sore state, BK took over, he vision didn't fit, Newman had the unfortunate of being a go between, DTC was the so called saviour, started well, ended badly, he left it in a worse state then the previous 3. SOC took over and now we are at a crossroads of him trying to bring the show back into a fit state but also his way of doing things is not to everyone liking. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
Actually emmerdale had 7million..
http://www.itvmedia.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:39.





