|
||||||||
Why are US soaps so bad? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,598
|
Why are US soaps so bad?
I used to like a bit of 1993 Days of our Lives but I watched an episode a couple of days ago and it was so bad.
The sets are all so obviously indoors, and in one scene I saw a mic dangling above the characters' heads. Neighbours is slated for its production standards but it looks like a Hollywood movie compared to DOOL. Home and Away in comparison, looks much more slick and realistic, even if the writing is poor a lot of the time. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
They're daytime shows so their budgets would only be a fraction of what H&A and Neighbours are made for. Also, they've had their budgets pared down in recent years in order to survive. Of the US soaps that I've seen, Days was always the one that looked most artificial. It's like they never moved away from the old style of recording everythIng, including outdoor scenes, on sound stages. The Bold and the Beautiful may not be great but it at least uses location filming on occasion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16,468
|
Probably because all the best writing talent, up and coming actors and funding goes to all the US dramas such as Game of Thrones, Westworld, Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead etc. US Soaps are perceived as nothing more than light daytime fluff over there, so it's understandable that all the best talent and funding will go elsewhere. The US drama industry has a lot more opportunities for people, unlike the UK.
There was probably a time when US soaps were considered to be good TV (my sister claims they use to be good in the old days), but I think those days are long gone now and US TV has moved on from soaps. In the UK, we treat our soaps as serious evening dramas and thery're very much a part of British culture (certainly Corrie and EE). Corrie and EE are considered flagship shows for the BBC and ITV, that is not the case for US soaps and none of them are comparable to the big US dramas that I listed above. Our soaps seem to be more adequately funded for this reason too because our broadcasters perceive them to be vital to their daily programming. UK soap writers aren't exactly the most talented either, but they seem to put more effort into their (frankly repetitive) storylining and there's simply more of a gritty quality in the settings, characters, storylines and filming quality in the UK soaps. Soaps aren't meant to be like movies and that's where I think the US go wrong because their larger-than-life style fits with movies and large scale TV dramas. Also we don't have great dramas like Games of Thrones and Breaking Bad, sure we can produce a half decent show like Luther and Sherlock, but we simply don't have the money to produce our own dramas of that scale and quality. So the BBC and ITV are able to focus on spending money on soaps a lot more. There's probably other reasons too. But I'd say that's about the gist of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,722
|
Quote:
I used to like a bit of 1993 Days of our Lives but I watched an episode a couple of days ago and it was so bad.
The sets are all so obviously indoors, and in one scene I saw a mic dangling above the characters' heads. Neighbours is slated for its production standards but it looks like a Hollywood movie compared to DOOL. Home and Away in comparison, looks much more slick and realistic, even if the writing is poor a lot of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
I haven't watched any of the daytime soaps since the late 90s (Sunset Beach which made a virtue of its crapness) so have no idea what they're like now but my first response is pace of production and lack of money.
They make 5 hours (less adverts) of tv-every week - that's a huge volume to write, act, direct and can only be done like a conveyer belt using multi camera and little or no time for retakes. It's actually amazing more mistakes don't get through. Consider that it is double the output of the UK soaps and more than double the Australian ones as they go off air December. Re the look of it, the Uk and Oz soaps immediately look better because they're not internnal studio bound which can't help look a bit cheap. Even those which are sets, but purpose built ones like EE, HO and Corrie benefit and H&A and Emmerdale have a huge advantage with the beauty of their natural landscapes - the ocean, beach and moors. Worth noting of course that the prime time soaps like Dynasty, Dallas, Knots Landing and more recent equivelents like Revenge or Desperate Housewives have very high budgets and are very slick and not just in how they look. I'd argue that Knots Landing was about the best written drama, not just soap but drama, America produced in the mid 80s rivalled only by Hill Street Blues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: glued to the computer
Posts: 10,036
|
The budget for the US daytime soaps is nothing like that for other forms of dramas, plus the daytime soap are entirely studio based, which limits what they can do. The US daytime soaps are almost entirely emotion and no action -- characters even have to soliloquise to move stories on because of the lack of action showing events moving. With other dramas and UK soaps, there's a better balance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
I used to like a bit of 1993 Days of our Lives but I watched an episode a couple of days ago and it was so bad.
The sets are all so obviously indoors, and in one scene I saw a mic dangling above the characters' heads. Neighbours is slated for its production standards but it looks like a Hollywood movie compared to DOOL. Home and Away in comparison, looks much more slick and realistic, even if the writing is poor a lot of the time. Now with Days specifically NBC has slashed their budget year after year which is why the production looks so bad, with the other 3 remaining soaps their production values are still pretty decent. Now I do have some hope for the soaps, The Young and the Restless hired former EastEnders producer Mal Young as EP and he has brought back creator Bill Bell's protege Sally Susman Morina as head writer so for the first time in years I think one of the soaps is moving in the right direction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,598
|
Thanks for all your insightful posts.
Has Days of our Lives ever done location filming? Or never? And also, do the other US soaps? Or did they ever? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
Thanks for all your insightful posts.
Has Days of our Lives ever done location filming? Or never? And also, do the other US soaps? Or did they ever? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
Thanks for all your insightful posts.
Has Days of our Lives ever done location filming? Or never? And also, do the other US soaps? Or did they ever? Closer to home, both Santa Barbara and Sunset Beach had limited beach work as they were based in coastal towns. All the night time soaps did, Dallas in Dallas for the 6 weeks each season, KL on the cul de sac and beach etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,854
|
They have always been the same. The great spoof 'soap' was so funny. Sunset Beach had me in stitches. They are not supposed to be real as ours are. People often say how depressing Eastenders is. In US soaps there can be the supernatural and the villains never seem to die. They are supposed to be fun. Many US actors view daytime as the day job while they wait for films etc. James Franco was on General Hospital I think. They don't see it as a climb down as our actors do. Jensen Ackles was on Days and that girl on Heroes was on a soap. The list goes on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,931
|
When I was living in the US, it seemed like most viewed soaps as a guilty pleasure and not taken very seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16,468
|
Quote:
I haven't watched any of the daytime soaps since the late 90s (Sunset Beach which made a virtue of its crapness) so have no idea what they're like now but my first response is pace of production and lack of money.
They make 5 hours (less adverts) of tv-every week - that's a huge volume to write, act, direct and can only be done like a conveyer belt using multi camera and little or no time for retakes. It's actually amazing more mistakes don't get through. Consider that it is double the output of the UK soaps and more than double the Australian ones as they go off air December. Re the look of it, the Uk and Oz soaps immediately look better because they're not internnal studio bound which can't help look a bit cheap. Even those which are sets, but purpose built ones like EE, HO and Corrie benefit and H&A and Emmerdale have a huge advantage with the beauty of their natural landscapes - the ocean, beach and moors. Worth noting of course that the prime time soaps like Dynasty, Dallas, Knots Landing and more recent equivelents like Revenge or Desperate Housewives have very high budgets and are very slick and not just in how they look. I'd argue that Knots Landing was about the best written drama, not just soap but drama, America produced in the mid 80s rivalled only by Hill Street Blues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 341
|
Its such a shame US viewers didnt take to sunset beach as it was so different to their other bland soaps. Its probably why sunset beach was the only daytime soap to be successful in the UK. With its location filming and not taking itself too seriously it was an enjoyable hour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 341
|
I always wondered why ITV picked Santa Barbara in 1987 for their new morning line up. It had already been running three years and they they split the episodes into half hours. The bold and the beautiful had started earlier in 1987 and was a half hour programme. Had ITV got that for daytime who knows it may have been a daytime hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: California
Posts: 1,373
|
I don't know, I live in the USA but I don't watch any soaps. Except of course EE ( online)
I used to work with a few ladies who were passionate about the Young & the Restless. It is not considered prime tv by most folk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 12,534
|
I remember Knot's s Landing when it was just about Karen, Val, Gary and their daily lives in a upper working class/ lower middle class suburb. Even though Gary's s were the multi- millionaire Ewings, he had left all that behind and settled down with Val. They were just everyday people.Then all of a sudden Karen, who was a stay-at- home Mum, became a high powered businesswoman and Val was an internationally best selling author
It got silly after that. Now there's s wrong with Karen becoming a businesswoman and Val a writer, but it was the level of success they both achieved ( and I only a few years) that seemed very ' soapy.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
Thanks for all your insightful posts.
Has Days of our Lives ever done location filming? Or never? And also, do the other US soaps? Or did they ever? Quote:
I always wondered why ITV picked Santa Barbara in 1987 for their new morning line up. It had already been running three years and they they split the episodes into half hours. The bold and the beautiful had started earlier in 1987 and was a half hour programme. Had ITV got that for daytime who knows it may have been a daytime hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
One bad episode of a one soap doesn't automatically mean all US soaps are bad?
However, Days of our lives is rubbish imo. All the US soaps have low budgets but Day's low budget is much more evident. It's at the bottom of the ratings. It's stories are crap. There are some great actors on there being wasted. It is utterly unwatchable. General Hospital and The Young and The Restless are fantastic imo. General Hospital does go for the sensationalism route, while Young and the restless is slightly more down to earth-ish. But i am a newish viewer so i am going by nearly a year's worth of episode, compared to someone like Mark who has been watching these shows for a long time. The Bold and The Beautiful has it's moments but it needs a good revamp. The show's storylines are either about love triangles or will they or won't theys. Nearly every character has slept or married or had a child with someone in that show. It's marvelous. They really do take that expression "keeping it in the family" to a whole new level in this show. The main issue with this show is that unlike all the other soaps, BB never updated it's format to 40 minutes (1 hour with commercials) and it has a very small cast. So the show can be very claustrophobic within it's cast but with the small running time, it does avoid drawn out scenes and wraps it's storylines up quickly |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
One bad episode of a one soap doesn't automatically mean all US soaps are bad?
However, Days of our lives is rubbish imo. All the US soaps have low budgets but Day's low budget is much more evident. It's at the bottom of the ratings. It's stories are crap. There are some great actors on there being wasted. It is utterly unwatchable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
They have always been the same. The great spoof 'soap' was so funny. Sunset Beach had me in stitches. They are not supposed to be real as ours are. People often say how depressing Eastenders is. In US soaps there can be the supernatural and the villains never seem to die. They are supposed to be fun. Many US actors view daytime as the day job while they wait for films etc. James Franco was on General Hospital I think. They don't see it as a climb down as our actors do. Jensen Ackles was on Days and that girl on Heroes was on a soap. The list goes on.
Quote:
Its such a shame US viewers didnt take to sunset beach as it was so different to their other bland soaps. Its probably why sunset beach was the only daytime soap to be successful in the UK. With its location filming and not taking itself too seriously it was an enjoyable hour.
Quote:
I remember Knot's s Landing when it was just about Karen, Val, Gary and their daily lives in a upper working class/ lower middle class suburb. Even though Gary's s were the multi- millionaire Ewings, he had left all that behind and settled down with Val. They were just everyday people.Then all of a sudden Karen, who was a stay-at- home Mum, became a high powered businesswoman and Val was an internationally best selling author
It got silly after that. Now there's s wrong with Karen becoming a businesswoman and Val a writer, but it was the level of success they both achieved ( and I only a few years) that seemed very ' soapy.'Quote:
One bad episode of a one soap doesn't automatically mean all US soaps are bad?
However, Days of our lives is rubbish imo. All the US soaps have low budgets but Day's low budget is much more evident. It's at the bottom of the ratings. It's stories are crap. There are some great actors on there being wasted. It is utterly unwatchable. General Hospital and The Young and The Restless are fantastic imo. General Hospital does go for the sensationalism route, while Young and the restless is slightly more down to earth-ish. But i am a newish viewer so i am going by nearly a year's worth of episode, compared to someone like Mark who has been watching these shows for a long time. The Bold and The Beautiful has it's moments but it needs a good revamp. The show's storylines are either about love triangles or will they or won't theys. Nearly every character has slept or married or had a child with someone in that show. It's marvelous. They really do take that expression "keeping it in the family" to a whole new level in this show. The main issue with this show is that unlike all the other soaps, BB never updated it's format to 40 minutes (1 hour with commercials) and it has a very small cast. So the show can be very claustrophobic within it's cast but with the small running time, it does avoid drawn out scenes and wraps it's storylines up quickly |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
I always wondered why ITV picked Santa Barbara in 1987 for their new morning line up. It had already been running three years and they they split the episodes into half hours. The bold and the beautiful had started earlier in 1987 and was a half hour programme. Had ITV got that for daytime who knows it may have been a daytime hit.
Cutting it down to half hour slots and then only twice a week just killed it though as it made it so slow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
I remember Knot's s Landing when it was just about Karen, Val, Gary and their daily lives in a upper working class/ lower middle class suburb. Even though Gary's s were the multi- millionaire Ewings, he had left all that behind and settled down with Val. They were just everyday people.Then all of a sudden Karen, who was a stay-at- home Mum, became a high powered businesswoman and Val was an internationally best selling author
It got silly after that. Now there's s wrong with Karen becoming a businesswoman and Val a writer, but it was the level of success they both achieved ( and I only a few years) that seemed very ' soapy.' |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 12,534
|
Quote:
That is not true, the soaps were all realistic until the 80's. When Gloria Monty took over as EP of General Hospital she introduced the idea of the super couple with Luke and Laura and had them in the big adventure stories where they were saving the world, that proved to be extremely popular giving GH record high ratings and when the other soaps saw that they copied the format. But even with that there were still some like All My Children that remained reality based.
Sunset Beach was not different, originally it was basically a daytime version of Melrose Place and when that didnt' work NBC had Days of Our Lives then head writer Jim Riley basically turn it into another Days of Our Lives with the over the top stories. I read an interview with Donna Mills a few years ago and she said that she had gone to creator David Jacobs and told him that people didn't want to come home from work and watch people work at a Ford dealership. I think all the US soaps are in a bad state, but Y&R will hopefully pick up next week when Sally Susman Morina's stories start airing. After reading her interview she really understands what Y&R is supposed to be and I think she will be able to return it to its former glory. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
Donna was wrong, IMO. I always enjoy the everyday scenes in soaps - conversations, family or work life, rather than the high drama. Look how successful comedies about ordinary people are too - 'Roseanne'being an excellent example. Or things like Gogglebox - a show about everyday people commenting on what they see in telly!
Similarly, I watched a documentary called The Cult of Sunday Night recently where they talked about the BBC's hit Sunday night dramas and it was pointed out that Howard's Way followed a similar path where it started out as a middle class couple dealing with the husband's redundancy and new career and by the time it ended, it was all fashion houses and aristocracy and was nearly unrecognisable from the original concept. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07.




It got silly after that. Now there's s wrong with Karen becoming a businesswoman and Val a writer, but it was the level of success they both achieved ( and I only a few years) that seemed very ' soapy.'