Originally Posted by Aftershow:
“Neil is probably the best political broadcaster we have. He's deliberately provocative in that manner to politicians of all colours.”
I didn't see this, but he's generally good, and just prods the person he's talking to at that time. You should not agree to an interview with Neil unless you have done your homework, because he always does his.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“Yes, I heard that! Maybe the Tories should have run a remainer and an anti-Heathrow candidate against him?
I get the impression Zac believed he would walk it! Bet he regrets his decision if he does lose!”
I think he expected to become Mayor, so promising to nobly stand-down was a diversion. Then he had to stick by it, but he still thought he'd have an easy victory.
Originally Posted by wizzywick:
“John Curtis suggests that if LibDems win it could be due to Labour voters turning away from Corbyn and choosing LibDems as an alternative. Interesting.”
There's no doubt that many Labour voters decided they'd much rather ditch Zac than help their party keep their deposit. It's just a shame that Labour decided to stand a candidate when many of their local members didn't want it, especially as UKIP were backing Zac. They were too vain, and too stubborn to admit the LibDems aren't actually Tories.
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“The look on John Curtice's face when Diane Abbott was ranting about his analysis being rubbish was priceless. And sums up the look that most people have when she opens her mouth.
This is the guy who led the team that delivered a spot-on exit poll last year. Somehow I think he knows what he's talking about.”
No-one should ever diss the Curtis. Admittedly, people do have a habit of having a go when he announces a tit-bit of information they don't like the sound of. However, people really should have learnt by now that not only is he usually right, he's not part of the conspiracy you assume is out to get your favourite.
He's one of the highlights of elections, and I love that he's so unashamedly academic looking.
Originally Posted by koantemplation:
“I think Goldsmith made the mistake of thinking the ByElection would be about Heathrow, when the Lib Dems made it about Brexit.
The trouble is that both were against Heathrow, but he was pro Brexit in a Remain area, so he was always onto a loser.”
He was too arrogant to realise that the electorate get to vote on whatever they want. Yes, the people of Richmond were annoyed by Heathrow, but also concerned by Brexit, and what's happening in the NHS, and the shift to the right by the Tories.
Originally Posted by
platelet:
“Excellent result that couldn't have happened to a smugger git. So much for his hissy fit 
Shame the Labour party couldn't have saved themselves the embarrassment and gone for not putting up a candidate but at least the Labour voters deserted en masse, Wolmar losing his deposit is is a nice final giggle, at least it will be when the Labour party spinners try to explain why the party is in anyway still relevant when Jerry's popularity has engorged Richmond CLP to 1600+ members but they could still only muster 1515 votes
”
There will be a lot of "I told you so" going on at the local party level.
Many Tories will insist that the LibDems didn't beat an actual Tory candidate, but the reality is that the LibDems beat the Tories AND UKIP combined. They had the backing of many Greens and some Labour, as well as groups like the WEP and MoreUnited. This was a very particular sort of by-election, but it goes to show that collaborative working is worth it in at least some instances. I expect to see more of it in the future.