• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • The X Factor
Why were they shocked at 5am being in the bottom two
DUNDEEBOY
27-11-2016
Dermot said it was a shock , Simon was shocked .

The next big thing just showed you how bad they are in that sing off
big bang theory
27-11-2016
I don't get it as they was clearly the worst last night, and to be honest they was the worst in the sing-off.
stash22
28-11-2016
Sara, Matt and Emily have all shown, many times, that they can sing very well without the help of loud backing tracks. Surely it would be way more if a shock if one of them were there. I don't get it, they all fully deserve a place in next weeks show. Would be interesting if Simon could say who should have been in bottom 2
satellite
28-11-2016
They're not as good as they think they are. But then again, apart from Saara, none of them are.
gcmac
28-11-2016
I couldn't work out why they were so surprised, I don't think 5AM are that good, especially when they don't have he backing vocals. This was the bottom 2 I predicted/ hoped for.
Getridofcole
28-11-2016
I just don't get the hype with them , their vocals are piss poor and were actually worse than honey g's in that sing off . Their dancing masks some awful performances vocally
Eva_Coco_May
28-11-2016
They are good all round entertainers but the vocals need work I can tell something is there but they need to learn to not sing out of tune I just think the vocal coach is shit on the show because once they go off the show they magically get better
Getridofcole
28-11-2016
Originally Posted by Eva_Coco_May:
“They are good all round entertainers but the vocals need work I can tell something is there but they need to learn to not sing out of tune I just think the vocal coach is shit on the show because once they go off the show they magically get better”

No, they are good dancers and that's it , they can't sing for toffee
GibsonSG
28-11-2016
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“Dermot said it was a shock , Simon was shocked .

The next big thing just showed you how bad they are in that sing off”

they thought it would be Emily, which is strange as the two best performances on Saturday were from Saara and Emily. Just shows you the delusion of the judges\producers.
mistygal
28-11-2016
So Honey G has gone and they were saved but I reckon, they will be gone next week anyway.
JohnStannard
28-11-2016
maybe because it exposed how unpopular they are, some people may have thought they were popular since they had avoided danger up until this point at a guess
minxymoo
28-11-2016
Originally Posted by JohnStannard:
“maybe because it exposed how unpopular they are, some people may have thought they were popular since they had avoided danger up until this point at a guess”

They haven't been in the bottom 2 before so their definitely not 'unpopular' i think it was voter apathy ie people assumed they would be safe as usual.by the way people should give them a break .Ive watched their sing off back and in my opinion it wasnt as bad as your all making out.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map