Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“The show is stuck in a rut . Its got the same format- year in and out - endless eating and creature trials, a preset final two, an obnoxious campmate to test the others, and most people sidelined with nothing to do. The people who vote just reinforce that - by voting for the same people to do the trials - because they don't like them , or do badly , or did well last time. Two thirds of the people there needn't turn up- as they don't even get given a role.
If they spread the tasks around, and went more for the trials that required intelligence and survival smarts, endurance, or physical ability , they would get a far more interesting show, and more people would get a chance to star. if it was a proper survival effort - with a wider range of tests - Sam, Ola , Lisa, and Carol would all be prominent because they are the best combinations of brains and physical ability. As it is, they are background noise, in a 4 person show.”
“The show is stuck in a rut . Its got the same format- year in and out - endless eating and creature trials, a preset final two, an obnoxious campmate to test the others, and most people sidelined with nothing to do. The people who vote just reinforce that - by voting for the same people to do the trials - because they don't like them , or do badly , or did well last time. Two thirds of the people there needn't turn up- as they don't even get given a role.
If they spread the tasks around, and went more for the trials that required intelligence and survival smarts, endurance, or physical ability , they would get a far more interesting show, and more people would get a chance to star. if it was a proper survival effort - with a wider range of tests - Sam, Ola , Lisa, and Carol would all be prominent because they are the best combinations of brains and physical ability. As it is, they are background noise, in a 4 person show.”
I'd also far rather hear the actual conversations than someone in the bush telegraph telling me about them afterwards.



