• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • Politics
Snoopers law creates security nightmare - given Royal Assent today
<<
<
1 of 5
>>
>
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Well, it's official - the UK government now has the 'most extreme spying powers ever seen':

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-a7445276.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38134560
CLL Dodge
29-11-2016
Tories hate the internet.
Vast_Girth
29-11-2016
Absolutely pointless intrusion in peoples lives. Disgusting.

So very easy to get around. It will only catch the innocent and incompetent.
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Vast_Girth:
“Absolutely pointless intrusion in peoples lives. Disgusting.

So very easy to get around. It will only catch the innocent and incompetent.”

And those who the government feel are a "nuisance" no doubt (anyone who goes against them for example).
jmclaugh
29-11-2016
and ano thread was needed to tell us the inevitable.
mick r
29-11-2016
Will this make the main news headlines..........i doubt it very much .
Mark_Jones9
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“Tories hate the internet.”

Labour voted for it too.
Vast_Girth
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by jmclaugh:
“and ano thread was needed to tell us the inevitable.”

Yet you still came in here to read it! What percentage of your 48k posts are just complaining about other people making threads? Its all you ever seem to do. Next time we would all appreciate it if you either just contributed to the thread or just ignore it and move on. Thanks.
Iggyman
29-11-2016
One question needs to be asked - how did it come to this?

Over-arching fear of terrorism was undoubtedly a strong selling point. Keeping the public ignorant about what online and data snooping exactly entails was also a feature.
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by mick r:
“Will this make the main news headlines..........i doubt it very much .”

You are absolutely correct.
Clarisse76
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Vast_Girth:
“Absolutely pointless intrusion in peoples lives. Disgusting.

So very easy to get around. It will only catch the innocent and incompetent.”

This. Any terrorist or criminal organisation worth its salt will have been circumventing these measures for years. Not even I will accuse May of being too stupid to grasp this, ergo this is purely an ideological policy from an authoritarian scumbag.

However, all the 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' twerps should now understand that it is their patriotic duty to circumvent these measures as well. By taking their harmless, inconsequential data out of the equation they will be freeing up more resources to catch the real criminals.

Originally Posted by Mark_Jones9:
“Labour voted for it too.”

Of course they did. It's the continuation of that other authoritarian scumbag Tony Blair's work.
mick r
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Iggyman:
“One question needs to be asked - how did it come to this?

Over-arching fear of terrorism was undoubtedly a strong selling point. Keeping the public ignorant about what online and data snooping exactly entails was also a feature.”

What they do is distract the public with things like Brexit and Trump and Jo Cox then sneakily put this through the backdoor . Its same with smart technology things like smart meters , smart cities and agenda 21 they never get talked about .
Mr Oleo Strut
29-11-2016
This is a very sad day in our history. This Tory government has undermined the rights of us all and I do not trust them to exercise their new powers either efficiently or honestly. There, that's put me high on their list. Bye!
Tassium
29-11-2016
I don't think it will last.

Unlike other freedom-crushing initiatives this one is very personal and creates the sense of Theresa May herself watching what people are doing in their homes via a virtual CCTV in every room.


Then there is the nature of the storage, ISPs basically are keeping this data in a shoebox with a cat sleeping on top. Hackable like nobodies business.

Who will be the victims of such a hack? MPs of course. And rich 'n famous people.
andersonsonson
29-11-2016
I'm mixed on this, what if it prevents a large terrorist attack?
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by mick r:
“What they do is distract the public with things like Brexit and Trump and Jo Cox then sneakily put this through the backdoor . Its same with smart technology things like smart meters , smart cities and agenda 21 they never get talked about .”

Exactly.

A lot of the media are also complicit in this relative blackout on the Snooper's Charter (whether involuntarily or not).
Tassium
29-11-2016
As we read in forums like this or comments underneath news articles, 99% of the public don't understand what it all means.

I do think the public will actually come to understand (and strongly resent) this one because it's so personal.
jmclaugh
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Vast_Girth:
“Yet you still came in here to read it! What percentage of your 48k posts are just complaining about other people making threads? Its all you ever seem to do. Next time we would all appreciate it if you either just contributed to the thread or just ignore it and move on. Thanks.”

I've no idea, feel free to calculate it.

I wasn't aware you tracked what I seem to do. If you wish to establish what 'we' would all appreciate start a poll, until then just speak for yourself.

My post was a comment and the last time I checked that's allowed, sorry if it upsets you. Thanks.

Btw I'm not in favour of this bill.
Clarisse76
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by andersonsonson:
“I'm mixed on this, what if it prevents a large terrorist attack?”

It won't. As I said above, any terrorist organisation worth its salt will already be circumventing these measures as a par for course.

Watching this government grapple with the complexities of the internet is like watching an earthworm grapple with a Rubik's cube - it can't even grasp the enormity of the task before it, let alone make any meaningful attempt to solve it.
Tassium
29-11-2016
One of things that will be done is "predictive crime", where huge amounts of data are analysed for patterns.

Then people can be investigated before they have committed any crime, and punished on the basis that they were going to do so.

Don't forget this has already happened, legislation like this just makes it a much more easy to do.


That's the bit that the public don't understand, how easy it will be to investigate them. The only reason the police don't spend time following random people around is because it's impractical/costly.

Not anymore it isn't.
paulschapman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by andersonsonson:
“I'm mixed on this, what if it prevents a large terrorist attack?”

It wont, in fact rather the reverse. Any serious analysis shows that Bulk Surveillance does not work. Not only that but it takes resources away from investigating genuine risks, so will actually increase the danger.

It is worse than that in the oversight is so weak it will allow Governments to suppress dissent and those who oppose their policies.

There was recently a haul of intelligence which highlighted plans for terrorist acts in Europe and it was not found by listening, but when land ruled by ISIS was captured. That is how intelligence is found. You then use that intelligence to target surveillance and so make us safer.

Nor is it worth looking to Labour - they tried to bring in their own version.
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Clarisse76:
“It won't. As I said above, any terrorist organisation worth its salt will already be circumventing these measures as a par for course.

Watching this government grapple with the complexities of the internet is like watching an earthworm grapple with a Rubik's cube - it can't even grasp the enormity of the task before it, let alone make any meaningful attempt to solve it.”

Indeed, and anyone who thinks that this new law is all about terrorism is wrong. Terrorism is just the crowbar that was used to get the Snooper's Charter into law. What it's really about is control, and Labour and Tory governments want ultimate control over the people.
Iggyman
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by Tassium:
“As we read in forums like this or comments underneath news articles, 99% of the public don't understand what it all means.

I do think the public will actually come to understand (and strongly resent) this one because it's so personal.”

Unfortunately though, by then it may be too late.
Nodger
29-11-2016
Originally Posted by andersonsonson:
“I'm mixed on this, what if it prevents a large terrorist attack?”

You'll be told it will / has and is a marvellous success, but the (my) reality is that it won't (much).
OLD HIPPY GUY
29-11-2016
The day we finally became a Big Brother state, how close did Orwell come to predicting the future?
When he wrote 1984 there were no computers or Internet, obviously, and TV was very much in it's infancy, but his concept of a future totalitarian government which could spy on every single citizen has very much become a reality today, and just as in his novel the down trodden herd don't even notice or care, after all Big Brother loves us and only wants what's best for us so what are you afraid of citizen?

The new Tory party motto,

War is peace freedom is slavery ignorance is strength.
<<
<
1 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map