DS Forums

 
 

Day of the Doctor - The War Doctor


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2016, 08:21
FluxCapacitor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 523
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure I ready a quote from Moffat saying there were three versions of the script early on - Eccleston taking the full "War Doctor" role as 9, the Eccleston-free version we eventually got with a new incarnation "War Doctor", and a version similar to the one we eventually got but with a smaller role for Eccleston, as Moffat wasn't sure how much he would want to commit to filming.

I always presumed the "smaller role" for Eccleston was nothing more than a post-regeneration scene.
FluxCapacitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-12-2016, 09:32
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,877
I think it's important to remember that we would never have had The War Doctor if Christopher Eccleston had agreed to return as the 9th Doctor.

The War Doctor was specifically created to fill a gap in the story of the anniversary special, which seems a rather poor reason to create an entire additional incarnation of the Doctor.

And the narrative around the War Doctor just doesn't make sense. There was no timey-whimey meddling with his timeline. The Doctor just chose to ignore the fact he existed. But that doesn't explain why (for instance) the Cybermen had no record of him in their infostamp in The Next Doctor.

And, for me, I guess I am still wondering why the 8th Doctor (Paul McGann) simply wasn't utilized instead. I think that would have been much more interesting, to see how the dashing and romantic 8th Doctor became a man willing to destroy his own world. And Paul's a great actor.

I don't want to start a big Moffat-bashing thread, but for me this was typical of his glib approach to Doctor Who continuity.
Hmm. I would say continuity has been treated in a fairly cavalier way throughout Doctor Who's history.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 11:11
amos_brearley
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
Those doubting the War Doctor as a warrior, don't forget that he was a young man following Eight's regeneration in Night... and a grizzled old man in Day... leaving lots of unseen time for him to have done the more shameful things. It seems odd to me that all the audios portray him as old too, failing to fill in any stories from his youth. I know it'll be to do with promoting the stuff (got to have current John Hurt photos on) bit audio seems the perfect medium in which to 'show' the younger version we could never see on screen.
amos_brearley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 13:39
The Amazing
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 317
More weirdness is when you literally have Tom Baker in the episode (and have Paul McGann filming a tie-in) you don't at the very least record new 4th Doctor dialogue and new 8th Doctor scenes for the finale when all the Doctors turn up : /
The Amazing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 22:04
k9fan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15,372
I was watching Day of the Doctor the other.... day... and at the end when the 3 Doctors appear to the War Council, you have Smith and Tennant announce themselves as The Doctor and then John Hurt goes "Also, The Doctor" or something like that. The way it is presented on screen is so matter-of-fact.

I was thinking that that moment really should have been bigged up; like it was a huge deal that the 'War Doctor' was introducing himself as 'The Doctor' especially as a fundamental aspect of his character was that he had shamed the Doctor name and had stopped using it. You could have had a reaction shot of Smith giving his approval.

I dunno, it just seems to me that the premise set up in Name of the Doctor was pretty much forgotten and John Hurt was just another Doctor instead of being this no-nonsense wildcard.
Absolutely wonderful Doctor, for me.
k9fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 23:49
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
More weirdness is when you literally have Tom Baker in the episode (and have Paul McGann filming a tie-in) you don't at the very least record new 4th Doctor dialogue and new 8th Doctor scenes for the finale when all the Doctors turn up : /
I suspect that any attempt to do this would end up feeling quite shoehorned in, and would make the whole thing feel more fragmented.

But I still thing The Night of the Doctor would have made a brilliant pre-credits-esque extended scene. People wanted a longer anniversary episode, this would have been a brilliant and shocking way to kick things off...alien planet, a Doctor no one is expecting, kicking off the anniversary by binding Classic Who and NuWho together in a way like never before. Of course the short accomplished all of that anyway, but it would have been a hell of a way to kick off the main event, and would have given Paul McGann the chance to appear in the show proper... that he still hasn't surprises me.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 10:47
be more pacific
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,034
I suspect that any attempt to do this would end up feeling quite shoehorned in, and would make the whole thing feel more fragmented.

But I still thing The Night of the Doctor would have made a brilliant pre-credits-esque extended scene. People wanted a longer anniversary episode, this would have been a brilliant and shocking way to kick things off...alien planet, a Doctor no one is expecting, kicking off the anniversary by binding Classic Who and NuWho together in a way like never before. Of course the short accomplished all of that anyway, but it would have been a hell of a way to kick off the main event, and would have given Paul McGann the chance to appear in the show proper... that he still hasn't surprises me.
It wouldn't fit. Different director, different production, not in 3-D. Plus there would be the whole problem of the story having two openings.

It's a 6-minute one-shot because that's all it was ever designed to be. Tacking it onto the start of Day of the Doctor wouldn't work at all.
be more pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2016, 20:45
donovan5
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 981
I always thought Eight was the best choice for any "War Doctor" as his Doctor was the ultimate optimist who always looked to avoid violence,him being forced to commit genocide makes 9 and 10s guilt even more apt.
I liked the 50th but I'm afraid I'll never be convinced that The War Doctor was a good idea or made any sense
donovan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2016, 20:55
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,732
It wouldn't fit. Different director, different production, not in 3-D. Plus there would be the whole problem of the story having two openings.

It's a 6-minute one-shot because that's all it was ever designed to be. Tacking it onto the start of Day of the Doctor wouldn't work at all.
But conceptually it could have been made to work. Not exactly as the finished product we got, but made specifically as part of the anniversary episode.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32.