• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
ED: Debbie's return announced
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
cyrilandshirley
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by HOAddict:
“You think she might have adopted her out while she was in France?”

Knowing Debbie, she probably just left her in a baguette shop and forgot about her.

Originally Posted by Chiltons Cane:
“I hope they recast Sarah, the actress is terrible and now she is older she could have more storylines but they really need someone who could act. Mind you Debs can't act either maybe they could recast her too, we live in hope!.”

I like Original Sarah!

Originally Posted by samcains90:
“What if Sarah comes back with new head? ”

As with NuGabby, I expect I'll be horrified at first, then get used to it. Depends how awful the new one is, I guess.

Still kind of miss OriginalGabby, she was awesomely sour. And they hardly use the new one anyway.
pegasus2
02-12-2016
Surely, miserable character. Guaranteed to suck any pleasure out of a scene. (And those are her good features).
samcains90
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by cyrilandshirley:
“As with NuGabby, I expect I'll be horrified at first, then get used to it. Depends how awful the new one is, I guess.

Still kind of miss OriginalGabby, she was awesomely sour. And they hardly use the new one anyway.”

I liked NuGabby from the start. What an excellent replacement - though almost a different character at times.

Sarah though, is a decent little actress, think she's worth keeping - though I suspect they'll be wanting to age her up too.
I'm surprised Noah hasn't been recast yet, while awaiting his growth spurt.
Nico_D
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by samcains90:
“I liked NuGabby from the start. What an excellent replacement - though almost a different character at times.

Sarah though, is a decent little actress, think she's worth keeping - though I suspect they'll be wanting to age her up too.
I'm surprised Noah hasn't been recast yet, while awaiting his growth spurt. ”

They may be able to age the actress up but not the charcther considering the story of her conception was Andy getting an underage Debbie pregnant making it so that Sarah's older would mean Debbie would have been even younger when she had her, therefore making Andy a pervert.

He was 18 and Debbie was 14 so if they mess with the ages they have to be very careful as it would essentially make Andy a peadophile.
Mark_Washingto1
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Nico_D:
“They may be able to age the actress up but not the charcther considering the story of her conception was Andy getting an underage Debbie pregnant making it so that Sarah's older would mean Debbie would have been even younger when she had her, therefore making Andy a pervert.

He was 18 and Debbie was 14 so if they mess with the ages they have to be very careful as it would essentially make Andy a peadophile.”

They kind of already have messed with Sarah's age in a round about way because of Liv. Liv is 14 but I had watched some old scenes from when Aaron was younger and when Sandra was pregnant with Liv Debbie had given Sarah to Emily and Jack was trying to track her down. So if Liv is 14 that means Sarah would have to be at least 15.
Nico_D
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Mark_Washingto1:
“They kind of already have messed with Sarah's age in a round about way because of Liv. Liv is 14 but I had watched some old scenes from when Aaron was younger and when Sandra was pregnant with Liv Debbie had given Sarah to Emily and Jack was trying to track her down. So if Liv is 14 that means Sarah would have to be at least 15.”

I think it's liv's age that's been changed, like I mentioned it wouldn't be as bad as Sandra was an adult anyway whereas Debbie was a schoolgirl pregnancy so they are on icy ground as far as Andy is concerned if they make Sarah older as Debbie would have to be rewritten as even younger at time of conception.

They can't make Debbie older either as charity was only 15 when she had Debbie so you would have the same problem there in making Cain seem like a pervert. I think they will have to leave her the same age really.
Mark_Washingto1
02-12-2016
Originally Posted by Nico_D:
“I think it's liv's age that's been changed, like I mentioned it wouldn't be as bad as Sandra was an adult anyway whereas Debbie was a schoolgirl pregnancy so they are on icy ground as far as Andy is concerned if they make Sarah older as Debbie would have to be rewritten as even younger at time of conception.

They can't make Debbie older either as charity was only 15 when she had Debbie so you would have the same problem there in making Cain seem like a pervert. I think they will have to leave her the same age really.”

I honestly think they need to stop mention the characters ages, when you start SORASing babies to teens you can't keep their parents at the same age. The US soaps rarely mention characters ages because of SORASing and I think that is for the best.
Adrian_Ward1
02-12-2016
Can't Debbie n Ross keep apart
Amazee-Dayzee
03-12-2016
So if Debbie comes back with Ross's baby, that means Moses gets a niece/nephew and a half-sibling? Or if the baby is Pete's, its Moses's first cousin and niece/nephew. The Dingles are already a screwed up family anyway. We already have Cain and Charity not only being her parents but her second cousins once removed.
Kell_Free
03-12-2016
Originally Posted by Amazee-Dayzee:
“So if Debbie comes back with Ross's baby, that means Moses gets a niece/nephew and a half-sibling? Or if the baby is Pete's, its Moses's first cousin and niece/nephew. The Dingles are already a screwed up family anyway. We already have Cain and Charity not only being her parents but her second cousins once removed.”

Ergh the thought of it...the idea of a Debbie/Ross baby is bad enough without the extra indirect incest thrown into the mix as well.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map