|
||||||||
Tory Privatisation Of Network Rail Track |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,682
|
Quote:
OK, not bad management, but atrocious management. Terrible structure for privatising the railways, implemented by idiots. Everyone lost apart from the banks that got paid as advisors. Will the present government learn from the mistakes of the past?
However, despite the current problems the UK rail network is in a much better shape than it was 20 years ago after decades of chronic underinvestment for all governments. Stations such as Kings Cross, St Pancras and Birmingham New Street are unrecognisable from the hell holes they were back then (Euston is still a dump though). Trains are more modern and passenger numbers are up year on year despite rising fares. Much more investment is still needed on Crossrail 2, HS2, HS3, East West Rail and many other schemes. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
U wanna hand track maintenance to richard branson, a man currently spending his virgin trains ''profits'' on fantasy spaceships for very rich people ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Quote:
Indeed. I have no problem in principle with private sector involvement in the railways but the original privatisation model was (literally) a recipe for disaster.
However, despite the current problems the UK rail network is in a much better shape than it was 20 years ago after decades of chronic underinvestment for all governments. Stations such as Kings Cross, St Pancras and Birmingham New Street are unrecognisable from the hell holes they were back then (Euston is still a dump though). Trains are more modern and passenger numbers are up year on year despite rising fares. Much more investment is still needed on Crossrail 2, HS2, HS3, East West Rail and many other schemes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,682
|
Quote:
U wanna hand track maintenance to richard branson, a man currently spending his virgin trains ''profits'' on fantasy spaceships for very rich people ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Despite over 20 years of public money spending, network rail still hasn't reached the so called ''pug 2''(passenger upgrade) target for west coast mainline, which was supposed to happen before year 2000 .........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Quote:
Branson wouldn't be building his spaceships unless he thought that there were big profits to be made from taking very rich people into space for a few minutes (I'd happily pay if I had the spare cash). The way businesses grow is by using the profits from one successful venture to invest in a one with potential for the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
In fact, business grow by borrowing money for investment. Not been a lot of that since banking crash of 2007 .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Before the ladbroke grove crash, there were frequent track closures due to derailments, with buses between ealing broadway and paddington. 2 weeks before it happened, train destination indicators on platforms all stopped working, and displayed a single message ''railway congestion'' ......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
After the crash, railtrack director gerald corbett said ''it's got nothing to do with me'', and left to run woolworths, which then went bankrupt and closed down ..,......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
There was frequent talk of ''corporate murder'', and possible prosecutions, but nothing ever happened .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Retired head of bbc world service, austin kark, was subsequently killed in the potters bar rail crash, due to incompetent maintenance .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
John prescott improved things as well as he could, by acting on professional engineering advice, and making emps track control installation mandatory ......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Stephen byers did exactly the right thing, in removing railtrack from private ownership .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,894
|
The problem with network rail is that investors, hedge funds and multinational corporations can't make money out of it. Hence the new calls for at least partial privatisation
So a few trains may crash, so what if we head back to the bad old days or rail track at least tory party donors can fill their boots with piles of public cash. Maintenance will be a lower priority to shareholder dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
I find the idea of re privatising railtrack, for private profit, utterly disgusting and quite sick and evil .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Quote:
The problem with network rail is that investors, hedge funds and multinational corporations can't make money out of it. Hence the new calls for at least partial privatisation
So a few trains may crash, so what if we head back to the bad old days or rail track at least tory party donors can fill their boots with piles of public cash. Maintenance will be a lower priority to shareholder dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
|
Quote:
That is debatable.
Their were subsidies that were promised to cover the years of underinvestment while it was nationalised - but the Labour government reneged on the last payment forcing it into administration. Not that Network Rail has been any better (and indeed has been worse). With it requiring for more money than was ever asked by RailTrack. Ignoring of course their is a fundamental difference between a national rail company and the franchisees who cover a smaller area. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,682
|
Quote:
In fact, business grow by borrowing money for investment. Not been a lot of that since banking crash of 2007 .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,010
|
Quote:
And so do governments. Labour is proposing borrowing an extra £500bn for investment to grow the economy.
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 956
|
I have the misfortune to use Southern twice a day. They do not have a franchise but are a management company directed by the DFT. The idea that the tracks will be managed by the DFT as well fills me with horror.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
and it makes sense if the people who use the trains pay - not those who don't..
Or, we could understand that all forms of transport need and receive some level of subsidy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,682
|
Quote:
Okay. So let's ramp up VED so that motorists pay their way (especially the road haulage industry), introduce other taxes for cyclists and pedestrians so that they fund the roads and pavements that they use, and axe any and all aviation subsidies.
Or, we could understand that all forms of transport need and receive some level of subsidy. In terms of the railways, some subsidies will always be required especially on rural routes but the question is where the balance should be between the passenger paying everything and public transport being totally free. If you think that the taxpayer should pay more to reduce fares then you need to work out where the money is coming from and whether you think it's fair on people who never use trains to subsidise season tickets for commuters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
I think you'll find motorists more than pay their way. Taxes on driving are far more than is spent on the roads. As a driver I have no problem with that.
Quote:
I
In terms of the railways, some subsidies will always be required especially on rural routes but the question is where the balance should be between the passenger paying everything and public transport being totally free. If you think that the taxpayer should pay more to reduce fares then you need to work out where the money is coming from and whether you think it's fair on people who never use trains to subsidise season tickets for commuters. The fact that the person "never uses a train" doesn't mean they shouldn't help pay for it. The point of public transport, after all, is to get people out of the car. You need an effective and affordable system to do that. Having an expensive/infrequent/unreliable rail network isn't a way to achieve that goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
|
Quote:
I think you'll find motorists more than pay their way. Taxes on driving are far more than is spent on the roads. As a driver I have no problem with that.
In terms of the railways, some subsidies will always be required especially on rural routes but the question is where the balance should be between the passenger paying everything and public transport being totally free. If you think that the taxpayer should pay more to reduce fares then you need to work out where the money is coming from and whether you think it's fair on people who never use trains to subsidise season tickets for commuters. A private company will raise private finance for the line - so it will be built, and eventually paid for by those using it. Its the only adult political option open. The only alternatives are build nothing , or the childish Corbyn one - which is to tax , borrow and print whatever number you last came up with - and hang the consequences in inflation, unemployment, interest rates and future borrowing costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,682
|
Quote:
The fact that the person "never uses a train" doesn't mean they shouldn't help pay for it. The point of public transport, after all, is to get people out of the car. You need an effective and affordable system to do that. Having an expensive/infrequent/unreliable rail network isn't a way to achieve that goal.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.




