DS Forums

 
 

I Demand A Second Richmond Park By-Election


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2016, 17:40
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
What a ridiculous post. There is a world of difference between a permanent result and one that can be changed within five years at least. Another attempt by a Brexiteer to 'do a Remainer' on it and failing spectacularly.
Bit of a slip there?
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-12-2016, 18:02
allaorta
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18,881
But... but... it would surely be cheap in a "there goes the neighbourhood" sort of way and then you could afford soundproofing so as not to hear all the sobbing through the walls.
Anyway, haven't they moved to Dublin./ Bordeaux yet?
Whisper.....they'd use aliases. You may recognise them by their clothes, they won't have splashed out since 23 June.
allaorta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 18:25
Granny McSmith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,066
Careful you don't buy a house between Trevgo and Aurichie.
The annoyance potential in this is so tempting. How many Brexit posters can you stick up on the front of a house?
Granny McSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 18:43
MidnightFalcon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Here--------->
Posts: 12,398
The point is you'll get another vote. In 4 years.
Doubt it, I live in Islington.
MidnightFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 20:10
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
The annoyance potential in this is so tempting. How many Brexit posters can you stick up on the front of a house?
Imagine making them live next door to this, Granny.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/1/...0c9b9db1a4.jpg
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 20:11
koantemplation
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,648
Imagine making them live next door to this, Granny.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/1/...0c9b9db1a4.jpg
Emily Thornberry would have a stroke if she saw that house.
koantemplation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:06
howard h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gtr Manchester UK
Posts: 7,914
Imagine making them live next door to this, Granny.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/1/...0c9b9db1a4.jpg
Is that leave the EU or the UK??
howard h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:18
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
Is that leave the EU or the UK??
It's just "leave it out, mate... you're 'aving a larf".
Actually, it's simply encouraging Aurichie and Trevgo to get their delayed packing done in case me or Granny come and live next door.... mind you, we could do a pincer movement either side of 'Chez Trevgo'
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:26
Javed
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,933
Relax it's okay, the fixed term parliament act guarantees you another say in 2020
Exactly! The result in Richmond is not permanent, unlike Brexit.
Javed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:28
Javed
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,933
Doubt it, I live in Islington.
We'll all get a vote in May 2020, no matter where we live,
Javed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:50
Granny McSmith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,066
It's just "leave it out, mate... you're 'aving a larf".
Actually, it's simply encouraging Aurichie and Trevgo to get their delayed packing done in case me or Granny come and live next door.... mind you, we could do a pincer movement either side of 'Chez Trevgo'
He won't know what's hit him!
Granny McSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 21:58
allaorta
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18,881
We'll all get a vote in May 2020, no matter where we live,
Thousands won't, they'll be dead and they'll all be Brexiters...I've been told.
allaorta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 22:00
allaorta
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18,881
The annoyance potential in this is so tempting. How many Brexit posters can you stick up on the front of a house?
.....or UKIP posters, just to remind Trevgo he once voted for them.
allaorta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 22:51
solenoid
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14,764
How is that poor snowflake, Sarah Olney, today after walking out of that Radio interview?
solenoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 00:54
andykn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London SW6
Posts: 37,469
Doubt it, I live in Islington.
A part of Islington that won't have a General Election by 2020? Islington USA?
andykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 01:00
Chief_Wiggum
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,957
Richmond is terribly socially liberal and caring sharing - as long as they don't have to pay more taxes to actually help the poor they claim to care about!
Absolutely right! The only way someone as absurdly PC and "We are the world" as Sarah Olney could possibly get voted in is through an unbearably "trendy liberal" constituency like Richmond Park.

No, the big story is Richmond voters put aside their own immediate best interests in voting against Heathrow expansion to reject Brexit in the wider interest.
Absolute nonsense. How does a poll of 50% of the people of Richmond Park (in which Sarah Olney won by a margin of just 4%) equate to a "rejection of Brexit"? Simple answer- it doesn't!

I like the Dems but this thread makes a very pertinent point in a rather amusing way.
Thanks. That's what it was intended to do. Just a shame there are some numbnuts on here who don't understand it.

No, just that they are prepared to put their own local interests aside for the country's best interests. Good for them.
Well, for a start, it's in the country's best interests to leave the EU, as 17,000,000 Brits realised. Secondly, the whole point of a by-election is for the people of a constituency to vote in someone who will represent them. What good has it done to vote for a useless protest candidate like Sarah Olney? It's not "in the national interest" in any way!

But you've got your second vote. In four years time.

And Olney didn't lie to the electorate and renege on those lies withing 24 hours.
Olney says she will stop the 3rd runway from being built. We'll see whether she lied.

Other Remain lies to the electorate include George Osborne saying house prices would fall, David Cameron saying there would be World War Three if Brexit happened, and Osborne claiming each family would be £8000 worse off per year. Both of those men lost their political careers because of those lies.

Irony may have been the intention but it failed dismally. It was pretty pathetic and childish - I'm surprised so many have risen to the bait.
In what sense was it "pathetic" or "childish". Just turning around the Remoaner arguments and using them in a different context. Strange that you claim others have "risen to the bait" when you yourself post on this thread with a reply clearly indicating that you're peeved with the thread!

Get a sense of humour and stop being so miserable and bitter.

That may be the intention, but it is a big fat fail on that part.

There WILL be another election in Richmond Park and it is less than four years away. The LibDems are not opposing this.

Olney campaigned on a number of issues, and didn't renege on any of them within hours of the polls closing.

I understand that it might make you feel better if you can have a laugh at something, but you must realising you are kidding yourself if you think there is any legitimacy to this particular approach.
Just because you couldn't appreciate the satire and irony in the post doesn't mean others couldn't. You don't decide what's funny.

Olney did not campaign on a number of issues- her entire campaign was based upon the falsehood that her being elected would be some kind of "rejection of Brexit" whereas Goldsmith focussed on the third runway.

There is no legitimacy to the Lib Dems' approach to the EU referendum- demanding a second one. That's what I was pointing out. Read my post again and you might get it.

I can't see how Zac Goldsmith being an MP is imperative to the future of our country.
Are you sure you're feeling well?

Or is this a feeble wind-up by someone with amoeba-style intelligence?
I think the first part of your post would come under the category of "feeble wind-up" and judging by the quality of your various political rantings you are either tremendously ill-informed or of "amoeba-style intelligence". I suspect it is a combination of both.

And whilst we're at it, I can't see how Sarah Olney becoming an MP is in any way "a rejection of Brexit" and therefore imperative to the future of our country.


The side that told the biggest lies.
Two words for you, Andy Pandy- SOUR GRAPES!

1. Obviously it was the one the people of Richmond wanted, so is the right result.

2. It was a legally binding election, not a referendum to view people's opinions.

3. By-election? There'll be a whole ruddy big-ass general election where the preople of Richmond can vote again!

4. A rise in hate crime you say? No there actually hasn't, so you've just lied. Not unexpected from a Brexiter.

5. Why would the future be a disaster without Zac Goldsmith? Evidence is probably the key requirement here, rather than more bs.

6. Feel free to petition. What do you want? A soft Goldsmith or a hard Goldsmith?

7. Do you see how your rant not only comes across as a bit silly and without substance, but also shows a really lack of insight into the political processes.
Ah, another person who just doesn't get it. Might as well indulge your idiocy:

1) No- it was the one that a miniscule majority of the 50% of the people of Richmond Park who voted wanted.

2) Government referendum literature stated "This is your decision. We will implement what you decide". This was never an advisory referendum.

3) Why should we allow Sarah Olney a day of wreaking havoc when she was elected on false promises and by libtards?

4) It was A JOKE! And even if it wasn't, have you got any evidence to prove that hate crime hasn't risen since Sarah Olney was elected? Because if the Remoaners are to be listened to, hate crime is rising all the time. Also, more bitterness. Not unexpected from a Remoaner.

5) Once again, a joke. It's called irony, matey. And if you really want to know, it's because Zac is very influential with his contacts and has campaigned resolutely against the third runway, whereas Sarah Olney is a wishy washy "we are the world" libtard whose silly little head can't even cope with a radio interview. Well done Julia Hartley-Brewer for exposing the ridiculous hypocrisy of the odious and pathetic Sarah Olney.

Nope, I understood the sentiment behind it.

It was just so banal, inept and so full of holes that a six year old would have been embarrassed by it!
Your first line contradicts your second. If you understood that the sentiment behind it was irony, why did you attempt (and fail embarrassingly) to pick it apart?

Get some perspective and try to stop chewing on those sour grapes.

What a ridiculous post. There is a world of difference between a permanent result and one that can be changed within five years at least. Another attempt by a Brexiteer to 'do a Remainer' on it and failing spectacularly.
Can always rely on a bit of trademark Remoaner nonsense from you, Ash. Once again- it was a political satire. It was irony. Try to take it as a joke and not as an attack on your increasingly feeble position as an ardent Remoaner.

Ash takes the bait, hook, line and sinker.
Indeed! He does it every single time!

How is that poor snowflake, Sarah Olney, today after walking out of that Radio interview?
She likes her interviews like she likes her Brexit- soft, or preferably not at all!
Chief_Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 01:04
Chief_Wiggum
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,957
The fact that I have been attacked by so many bitter Remoaners just shows how humourless, vindictive and boring these people are- they either can't take a joke or can't even understand it. A bunch of whiny Remoaning losers. No wonder they didn't win the referendum!
Chief_Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 01:25
andykn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London SW6
Posts: 37,469
Two words for you, Andy Pandy- SOUR GRAPES!
Brexit denial at its finest. So when does the NHS get it's 350m?
andykn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 01:33
Penny Crayon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,482
The fact that I have been attacked by so many bitter Remoaners just shows how humourless, vindictive and boring these people are- they either can't take a joke or can't even understand it. A bunch of whiny Remoaning losers. No wonder they didn't win the referendum!
I have a great sense of humour.
Your thread is neither funny or ironic. I think immature and pathetic describe it better.

Sorry - I'm only telling it as it is.
Penny Crayon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 01:48
MARTYM8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,276
I have a great sense of humour.
Your thread is neither funny or ironic. I think immature and pathetic describe it better.

Sorry - I'm only telling it as it is.
Immature and pathetic more accurately sums up the Lib Dems current opportunistic position on Brexit - which this thread sought to highlight. Let's just keep voting until remain wins and if that doesn't work lets use our unelected Lords to block it.

They would sell their own Grannies to get a few more votes.
MARTYM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 02:07
Dan 54
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,780
I have a great sense of humour.
Your thread is neither funny or ironic. I think immature and pathetic describe it better.

Sorry - I'm only telling it as it is.
You dont have a great sense of humour on here!
You're constantly offended by everything.
Dan 54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 02:08
Dan 54
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,780
Brexit denial at its finest. So when does the NHS get it's 350m?
Thats original.
Shall we drag yet again through all the remain bullshit?
Dan 54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 03:04
Ash_M1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Love The Beeb! PROUD Remoaner!
Posts: 11,139
The fact that I have been attacked by so many bitter Remoaners just shows how humourless, vindictive and boring these people are- they either can't take a joke or can't even understand it. A bunch of whiny Remoaning losers. No wonder they didn't win the referendum!
On the contrary, us 'Remoaners' take the future of our country very seriously. We know what we are talking about. Anyone who threatens our future will be challenged very robustly...joke or otherwise.
Ash_M1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 03:08
Dan 54
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,780
On the contrary, us 'Remoaners' take the future of our country very seriously. We know what we are talking about. Anyone who threatens our future will be challenged very robustly...joke or otherwise.
Oh get over yourself,who do you think you are? Judge Dredd?
Dan 54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2016, 03:18
Ash_M1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Love The Beeb! PROUD Remoaner!
Posts: 11,139
Oh get over yourself,who do you think you are? Judge Dredd?
I am an educated, well informed Brit who loves my country. I don't want to subject the UK to unnecessary 'self harm' and unnecessary decline.

Re-e-main...when the crowd say bo-selecta!
Ash_M1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28.