|
||||||||
Saara and 5 after midnight were outstanding |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,486
|
Saara and 5 after midnight were outstanding
Both deserve to be in the final. Both were miles better than the others.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,442
|
They were actually the best two on the night. Matt was poor and predictable, Emily was just static and erratic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,533
|
They were far superior to the other 2.
Matt is just the bland bog standard pretty boy with the charisma of a plank and Emily might as well release 'NowThats What I Call John Lewis' |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,486
|
Quote:
They were actually the best two on the night. Matt was poor and predictable, Emily was just static and erratic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 158
|
I agree. Saara was incredible but I also enjoyed 5 AM this week. Matt was a huge disappointment to me. :-/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,442
|
Actually they are all predictable and do the same thing week in week out.
5am do the same slick moves and uptempo songs but they were good tonight |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 4,912
|
5am are overrated. There is never a time when the three are singing together and they're not drowned out by the backing singers. It's all very fake.
Saara was phenomenal, and I always personally enjoy Emily since that's my preferred style of singer. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
|
Quote:
Both deserve to be in the final. Both were miles better than the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,486
|
Quote:
5am are overrated. There is never a time when the three are singing together and they're not drowned out by the backing singers. It's all very fake.
Saara was phenomenal, and I always personally enjoy Emily since that's my preferred style of singer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,905
|
5AM have been weak throughout. One hugely popular song and another that's easy to hide in isn't going to change that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4,442
|
Quote:
There were no backing singers on their first song!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,692
|
Quote:
Emily is very predictable. Saara and 5AM were in a different league
The gap between these two and the others was too wide. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 968
|
I don't think any of them were that good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jedward Land
Posts: 3,477
|
Saaras Christmas song was a theatrical masterpiece and for once she avoided her usual great star but quickly tapers off performance. I biwve she saved the tapering off (without great start) for her second song which could have seriously harmed her chances. 5AM although they put in an amazing performance with Stay (much better than their cheesy banity until then) but soon reverted to type with song number two, and to think they were saved over Honey is unbelievable. Although taki G both their performances as a whole were better than Saara I have to place them bottom for cheating. Just because a song is Christmas Number One does NOT make it a Christmas song, if it did Matt would have been better off singing a Bob the Builder/Mr Blobby mash-up which would've been better than his two lacklustre-at-performances. The only highlight of the night for me who despite a safe performance with Lennon totally nlewxeveryonecelse out the water with Mad World, plus we had the added bonus of seeing her bare feet again (yum).
So overall my placings look like this 1 Emily 2 Saara 3 Matt 4 because of cheating 5AM therefore if we have a bottom two Matt should go as 5AM are better and shouldnt go because Louis is a cheat (I guess he lost his rulebook) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,712
|
I think 5AM had a good week they did really well and Saara is always good! Emily was dreadful and Matt is just boring
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,092
|
They were the strongest last night that's for sure.
I found Emily dreadful myself, completely flat. Matt was decent vocally but boring I totally agree with Simons comments about his second song. Poor choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,468
|
The OTT judges praise for 5AM were ridiculous, they were once again miming through the performances with loud backing track.
Matt is getting predictable and boring but singing wise it wasn't the worst of the night. Anyone praising Emily's Mad World rendition should take a look at Adam Lambert's version on American Idol to see how it's done! Therefore, by process of elimination, Saara defaulted to be the best of a bad bunch on a truly pathetic year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 72
|
Saara was amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
|
5AM were out of tune and ruined a good song as usual.
Saara was amazing as usual. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,752
|
5am were outstanding for part of their performance
out standing in a loading bay outside the studio i'll get my coat ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Over the Rainbow
Posts: 379
|
I think 5AM did have backup in the first song when all of them sang together. It sounded like there were more than three voices in the harmony sections. They were fun though, even if they get tons of help vocally and that put them above Matt and Emily for me this week.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:50.


