Originally Posted by Mariesam:
“I understand your points, but is it the business of a public funded broadcaster to pick and choose political coverage based on if it will get headlines? Surely with how unreliable polls have been, they wouldn't have really known if there was a story til after the result.....It gives the impression one area is more relevant than another based on how it votes and that shouldn't be in the BBCs remit. Reporting facts, not trying to make up stories should be the majority of what the BBC produces....you can leave bias opinions that to the tabloids....of which the BBC and others become worringly addictive to covering.”
The BBC, like all organisations, has a limited budget. In the case of the BBC, a shrinking budget. Would you expect the BBC to fund LiVE coverage of a fairly predictable by-election at 3.30/4.00am when most people are in bed asleep? I wouldn't. The BBC made the right call. In short, it was an 'as you were' kind of By with the only story being the fall in the Labour vote and the resurgence of The Dems.