And men?

As I said there is no evidence that extra spending is related to women getting the vote - I provide you with facts to back that up - you just keep repeating the same thing with nothing to back it back.


I don't need to wait - I can tell how he will be by the people he is appointing, but what he says he will do and the way he acts. Also having been in a political position, I know how tough people can be, how they twist what you say and Trump is not exhibiting anything like the toughness he will need, rather acting petulant - just take his reaction to the SNL sketches, for most politicians it is like water off a ducks back - they ignore it. Trump fires off a tweet, when he should be working with a transition team to ensure a proper transfer of power. He will not have time to do such things when POTUS anymore than he has time now.

Apparently so. To darn bad for most here she lost.

Neither was Hilary Clinton, so what's your point?

We can discuss what he's already done, which is name a group of incompetents as his Cabinet as rewards for supporting him during his campaign.

He's spent time getting into a twitter slap fight with Alec Baldwin.

He proposed a terrible Carrier deal that is completely non-scalable and ridiculous.

He's an incompetent moron.

whoosh.

Trump doesn't actually support the recount, but thinks that there were 3 million invalid votes.

More women vote then men. Yes, you do need to wait and see what sort of POTUS Trump will be. As for toughness, you have zero idea how tough Trump is, you do not know the man anymore then I do. Wait and see what happens after 20 January 2017.

you have no point and are contributing nothing of substance to this thread. i'm positive that is your intention, but it isn't worth going back and forth with someone who doesn't actually care about anything.

boring.

Bill was more a sexual predator then Trump is being accused of being.

you're just rehashing talking points from the campaign. Trump won, you need to get a new set of canned responses so you can get ready to defend him without mentioning the Clintons.

Bill wasn't up for election, Hilary was, so I still can't see your point.

Trump isn't even in office yet. Wait till his first 100 days have passed before you comment, otherwise you are just dissing him based on your personnel dislike of the guy.

The United Nations is the Mainstream Press?

UN report into the Syrian Civil War detailed the use of Chlorine Gas, the dropping of Barrel bombs, longstanding findings of systematic torture and deaths of detainees.

see http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc...ymbol=A/68/663

(That would be the actual report, not just a press report)

I have another point of view, I'm not going to nit pick and split hairs with you all, you think and other in this thread think Trump will be a bad president, which is your right, my right is I think he's a breath of fresh air in a bad smelling US political establishment, and a new broom sweeps clean.

Most intelligent people do not need to wait till Trump takes office to know he is a waste of space

I am stunned that someone who has contempt for half the population of the world feels they have views others should consider. Did you fall asleep in Viking times and just wake up?

feels not reals.

you don't know anything about what he is doing, and you don't acknowledge things he's already done or said, but you 'feel' good about him so that's all that matters.

ok.

You just can't accept that Trump won the election. Complain all you want it won't make any difference, Trump will be the 45th US president, and Clinton won't.

I think we've figured out the problem.

Still not proof that extra spending is down to women getting the vote.


No I don't because I have the evidence of what he has done and said.


Actions. He wants to roll back NATO commitments at a time when Putin is quoted by a leading member of Putin's inner circle of wanting Russia to reclaim the Baltic States and Finland (although I grant the latter is not a member of NATO yet).

The last person who waited while an aggressor continued to seize countries was a certain Neville Chamberlain. You might want to look it up.



It is too late then, mind you it is too late now.

And you believe the UN, the US controlled talking shop.

As for the use of Chlorine gas, that was shown have come from the FSA, as for barrel bombs, the Syrian air force in its inventory has no bombs shaped like a barrel. As for the rest, typical of propaganda against as opposition.

I've switched off from his posts, he is a paranoid, sexist conspiracy theorist. Or a wind up merchant.

Most intelligent people would wait and see what Trump does after he become POTUS instead of passing judgement before he is sworn in.

Or all of the above.

You only hear from the biased msm what he is doing, and feel it is enough to pass judgement on his presidency which doesn't start till January.

trump?

I meant Another POV, but as it happens... 😂