|
||||||||
Supreme Court Brexit Appeal |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#226 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
I don't think you understand what he has just said. With two words he has trashed the judiciary, parliament and democratic history of our country.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
You can think whatever you want but for someone who has shown a complete lack of understanding of words i don't think you're in a position to tell me what i do or don't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
Lol. I take comfort that neutral journalists gasped as much as I did when he came out with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
I knew how the Brexit vote would go because there's a vast swathe of voters who are little more than stupid sheep but this horror story is only going to get worse.
Anything that has a hope in hell of stopping it has my "vote". |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
Yes well you can take comfort in the fact Journalists agree with you in points of law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,751
|
Loving the Farrage interview on sky; he seems to be standing in front of a price list for UKIP tat "key ring £1.50", "wristband £2.00"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,743
|
After reading or listening to all the Government's points today, I was left with one overriding thought, something that was neatly encapsulated a few minutes ago by one of the judges' comments to the Government barrister Mr. Eadie:
Lord Mance said there was a “huge difference” between the power to change the rules of a club one was a member of - and not being a member of the club at all. That's the biggest weakness in the Government's case, expressed as concisely as it can be, by one of the supreme court judges. They will I expect continue to cut through all the woolly fluff and legalese to get right to the nub of the issue, which is how it should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
Sorry the implications of what he said have nothing to do with law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 48,023
|
Quote:
What planet are you on?
Every single rule we currently have when manufacturing a product for sale in the UK and EU will remain. Any and all financial regulations will remain if we want to have the tiniest chance of conducting business with the EU. Shared broadcasting licences will remain. Just a few examples... As for rights - all employment legislation will remain in force, the European privacy laws will remain in force, the European patent regulations will remain in force; consumer rights will remain in force... Just a few examples... There are hundreds of others. You do understand what the GRB is I hope? Btw we have to abide by the local rules of any market we sell into but we don't have to implement those rules here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8,961
|
Quote:
Loving the Farrage interview on sky; he seems to be standing in front of a price list for UKIP tat "key ring £1.50", "wristband £2.00"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 432
|
Quote:
I knew how the Brexit vote would go because there's a vast swathe of voters who are little more than stupid sheep but this horror story is only going to get worse.
Anything that has a hope in hell of stopping it has my "vote". |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Isle of Dogs
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
I knew how the Brexit vote would go because there's a vast swathe of voters who are little more than stupid sheep but this horror story is only going to get worse.
Anything that has a hope in hell of stopping it has my "vote". |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Haha so according to Eadie "Parliament has legislated to control withdrawals of other countries from the EU Treaty" but "in relation to our withdrawal there are no controls" ?!?
What on earth is he doing??? So our Parliament would rule on other countries leaving but would leave government to do as it pleases when it comes to our own withdrawal? |
|
|
|
|
|
#239 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
What on earth is he doing???
I mean that has been their entire point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#241 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8,961
|
Quote:
Even if the judges rule that parliament must have a say in triggering A50, it won't stop Brexit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
Emphasising the point that they haven't legislated and as a result haven't restricted the use of the prerogative perhaps?
I mean that has been their entire point. Wow. Shame that this goes very much against their argument that the ref should be considered binding. I mean after all parliament didn't legislate that is could be advisory, regardless of the fact that the referendum act stipulates that all referendums are advisory and that the only ever binding referendum was made so.... by parliament (the A/V ref in case people forgot). |
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 59,745
|
Scenes of Farage's 100,000 people marching on the Supreme Court
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7456406.html Shame 99,998 seem to have gone missing... |
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Isle of Dogs
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
Why not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
Lol. My neighbour in number 58 never told me that I couldn't just enter his house, whereas my neighbour in number 60 did. So I conclude that I can just enter number 58.
You're not very good at this are you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
Do you have the authority to enter peoples houses at will?
You're not very good at this are you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
Does the government have authority to change domestic law via RP. Thought not.
Like i said, you aren't very good at this are you? Words mean things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,670
|
Quote:
Yes, it was laid out pretty clearly,
Quote:
the only objection made was whether or not it applied to the abolition of law.
Like i said, you aren't very good at this are you. Words mean things. As opposed to you, yes I am damn good as this... as proven in my daily work and as proven, publicly on here, predicting how the High Court would rule and why. |
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 17,092
|
Quote:
You're still taking the governments arguments as gold.
. The judge accepted the fact that the prerogative can "change laws" from "time to time". but he wasn't so convinced it applied to the abolition of laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8,961
|
Quote:
Apart from a few MPs who do not respect the vote on June 23rd, it will be voted through parliament.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38.



