Originally Posted by FusionFury:
“Hard Brexit conservative MPs has played a blinder too in that if the Labour MPs refuse to support them in activating Article 50, Labour will look the bad ones and get the flack. Teresa May has to dance her cabimets tune now ! Who are sick of waiting and want to force it through quicker and rightfully so it's best for everyone.
So Atleast we have a pathway now and a timetable for Brexit. Smug Gina Miller can do one ! I'm laughing at all the money she's wasting with these court cases and travelling personally.. And in the end she hasn't changed a thing LOL ! Goodbye !”
Originally Posted by
FusionFury:
“A big vote happening today:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/234225...te-for-brexit/
Best thing May has done, she has played a blinder. Turning the tables on the people hiding !
It's either Hard Brexit or no Brexit, no Soft Brexit no half measures of sneaking into the EU through some back door like a third World country would do.. Simple vote will decide the cards on the table and then in 2020 the traitors will be outed when the public appoint a new government that works for the people of the UK ! majority should rule in a democracy.. and the public have spoken.
It is time for action, no more empty promises !”
I know your posts often don't make much sense but this one actually warrants responding to.
You do understand (maybe not as you quote the Sun) that this motion has no impact at all on the Supreme Court appeal?
In fact the government went on record yesterday to ensure that no one misinterprets the vote today as an "expression of will" of Parliament.
In fact it had to do so as two certain Tory backbenchers claimed exactly that. It went as far to remind people that Major tried a dirty trick by amending a motion and that didn't turn out very well.
Now, while it may appear that May's move was quite clever even with the above taken into consideration, this is not the case at all. This in fact smells of a BoJo attempt to be clever (his name is on the amendment and May's out of the country).
While any MP voting yes will agree to the March timetable (which really no one ever had a problem with apart from a handful of MPs), this is irrelevant if MPs believe that the government isn't upholding its part of the deal - i.e. giving enough details.
A motion isn't worth the paper it's written on - what makes this one interesting is the total U-Turn of government within hours of putting out a statement to the opposite effect... on a day where its lawyers were torn to pieces and the court made clear that it would wish to know more about the Great Repeal Bill but the government had to admit that there are no plans.
As for your Gina Milla comment - she is not wasting any money on this at all but more importantly she is only one tiny part of the whole court case. There are no less than 5,000 ORDINARY people involved. So once and for all stop bashing her. She was unlucky to be made the lead claimant by the courts, which is a very random and complex process.