|
||||||||
BBC News Caught Staging FAKE News Chemical Attack In Syria |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
BBC News Caught Staging FAKE News Chemical Attack In Syria
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blg9XVBUEZg
Footage has emerged of the BBC staging aftermath of so-called chemical attack. Truly reprehensible stuff, why do people still take the BBC seriously? |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Stirling/Windsor/Overseas
Posts: 14,338
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blg9XVBUEZg
Footage has emerged of the BBC staging aftermath of so-called chemical attack. Truly reprehensible stuff, why do people still take the BBC seriously? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
"UK Regulator".Of course OFCOM will back the BBC. The footage is there. You can clearly see they are wearing makeup. Also note the digitally altered footage from 2013, you can see how they have replaced the word "napalm" with "chemical weapons". The BBC have been caught red handed. It's up to you if you want to keep believing their blatant propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
|
Would that be the same false claim that can be found on the BNP website and which Russian Television was found guilty of faking a massive investigation? Quote:
The Russian global news broadcaster RT has been found guilty by Ofcom of misleading its audience after it reported a “massive investigation” into claims that the BBC’s Panorama had faked pictures of a chemical attack in Syria. It sits well alongside FOX News fake story.
Ofcom also found Fox News, part of Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox media empire, breached the code when one of its contributors claimed that Birmingham had become a city “where non-Muslims just simply don’t go”. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Would that be the same false claim that can be found on the BNP website and which Russian Television was found guilty of faking a massive investigation?
It sits well alongside FOX News fake story. Do you have any proof that the FOX news story was fake? I certainly know a few people from Birmingham who would back that statement up. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
|
Quote:
Well it may be nonsense but Ofcom said it was "not possible or appropriate" for the regulator "to attempt to prove or disprove the allegations made about the BBC", or in other words Ofcom didn't declare the RT claim to be false or true.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Oh well, you can't argue with an alt-right conspiracy theorist.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Oh well, you can't argue with an alt-right conspiracy theorist.
The BBC have been caught red handed faking footage, you have seen the footage for yourself and yet you still choose to believe their lies. People are starting to wake up though, soon the "conspiracy theorists" will be the minority of people who still believe everything the BBC tells them to believe. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,746
|
Quote:
It is however possible they were taken for mugs. Very opportune timing.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
It is however possible they were taken for mugs. Very opportune timing.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Ah but that's not the allegation is it? The gullible Putin-worshipping alt-right eejits believe the BBC staged it completely.
That's not gullible at all... How many times has the BBC been investigated by OFCOM for it's blatant left wing bias? The answer is that it hasn't, that alone shows the credibility of OFCOM. You are yet to present a convincing argument debunking the footage you have been provided without appealing to a dubious authority. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
|
Quote:
I don't care what OFCOM has to say, they will obviously be biased in favour of the BBC. The footage is there in plain sight.
Do you have any proof that the FOX news story was fake? I certainly know a few people from Birmingham who would back that statement up. I'm sure the flat earth society will welcome you with open arms along with holocaust deniers. You clearly don't know the background to the Fox News story...the commentator himself withdrew the false claim... Quote:
A terrorism commentator who sparked outrage on Fox News after claiming Birmingham is 'a totally Muslim city and a no-go area for non-Muslims' has apologised. If you want to believe an email offering you £20,000,000 from a bank account for a payment of £2,000 is legit, then go forth and multiple.....your wealth.
Steve Emerson.... said: "I have clearly made a terrible error for which I am deeply sorry. My comments about Birmingham were totally in error." He added that he should have been "more careful" before saying: "There was no excuse for making this mistake and I owe an apology to every resident of Birmingham." |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Of course you don't care what OFCOM says as you want the truth covered up...anyone would think you were a troll.
I'm sure the flat earth society will welcome you with open arms along with holocaust deniers. You clearly don't know the background to the Fox News story...the commentator himself withdrew the false claim... If you want to believe an email offering you £20,000,000 from a bank account for a payment of £2,000 is legit, then go forth and multiple.....your wealth. Interesting you bring up the Flat Earth Society considering this quote by former BBC business editor Jeff Randall: Quote:
“It’s a bit like walking into a Sunday meeting of the Flat Earth Society. As they discuss great issues of the day, they discuss them from the point of view that the earth is flat.
“If someone says, ‘No, no, no, the earth is round!’, they think this person is an extremist. That’s what it’s like for someone with my right-of-centre views working inside the BBC.” |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
As I have said, until OFCOM show their impartiality by investigating outlets such as the BBC for blatant left-wing bias, I will not take them seriously.
Interesting you bring up flat earthers considering this quote by former BBC business editor Jeff Randall: |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,746
|
Quote:
Ah but that's not the allegation is it? The gullible Putin-worshipping alt-right eejits believe the BBC staged it completely.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 276
|
It's a pretty damming video, the acting was terrible, see the guy just managing to do the peace sign as he collapses, and all there clothing ripped perfect, to perfect, should be lost limbs ffs.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
But you believe Russia Today is unbiased and should be taken seriously?
Unlike mainstream media outlets, they do not claim to be impartial. I don't automatically believe everything I see on Russia Today, I evaluate the evidence they provide in contrast to the evidence the BBC provide. This is different to how most people view the BBC. Most people automatically believe everything the BBC report to be true due to their masquerade of impartiality. They will then in turn automatically discredit alternative media as a base for conspiracy theories, much like you have done. They are not encouraged to form their own opinion, critical thought is made redundant. Most people who watch Russia Today are familiar with the tactics of the mainstream media and go to alternative media to form a balanced opinion based on the 2 competing opinions. This is why we had Brexit, this is why we are due President Trump. This is why mainstream political parties are losing power. You can deny the paradigm shift in thinking all you like but people are starting to think for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
It's a pretty damming video, the acting was terrible, see the guy just managing to do the peace sign as he collapses, and all there clothing ripped perfect, to perfect, should be lost limbs ffs.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Here is a video showcasing the original and doctored footage back to back:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFPJYtvtHaQ |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
So, just for the record, you think the BBC staged the whole thing?
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 25,218
|
Quote:
Russia Today offers an alternative perspective, one in which the West is not infallible and Putin is not a comic villain.
Unlike mainstream media outlets, they do not claim to be impartial. I don't automatically believe everything I see on Russia Today, I evaluate the evidence they provide in contrast to the evidence the BBC provide. This is different to how most people view the BBC. Most people automatically believe everything the BBC report to be true due to their masquerade of impartiality. They will then in turn automatically discredit alternative media as a base for conspiracy theories, much like you have done. They are not encouraged to form their own opinion, critical thought is made redundant. Most people who watch Russia Today are familiar with the tactics of the mainstream media and go to alternative media to form a balanced opinion based on the 2 competing opinions. This is why we had Brexit, this is why we are due President Trump. This is why mainstream political parties are losing power. You can deny the paradigm shift in thinking all you like but people are starting to think for themselves. After Putin came into power in 2000, he established control over the three main TV stations. In 2001 and 2002, he took control of the two biggest TV channels, ORT (now First Channel) and NTV. The state broadcaster, RTR (now Rossiya 1), was already under his control. The Russian media portrays anything going on from the point of view of Vladimir Putin. During his subsequent year in power, Putin moved more and more outlets under his influence until he controlled most of the major mainstream media. He appoints editors and general directors, either officially or unofficially. The director of VGTRK, the biggest [state] media holding, which owns Rossiya 1, Rossiya 2 etc., is appointed by presidential decree, for example. When it comes to so-called independent media, which are smaller and not owned by the state, there’s often an agreement between the Kremlin, the owner and the editor-in-chief. Even Aleksey Venediktov, the editor-in-chief of Echo Moskvy, which is sometimes called the last remaining independent radio station in Russia but in reality isn’t independent, says publicly that Putin is the only person who can fire him. The editors and directors have so-called weekly meetings with the presidential administration to talk about the upcoming events, what will be significant in the next week, what the administration wants to cover. Additionally, media outlets are dependent on state funding and the TV advertising market is almost monopolized as well |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,248
|
Quote:
As I have said, until OFCOM show their impartiality by investigating outlets such as the BBC for blatant left-wing bias, I will not take them seriously.
: |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
|
Quote:
Here is a video showcasing the original and doctored footage back to back:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFPJYtvtHaQ |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
So, just for the record, you think the BBC staged the whole thing?
Take a look at this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFPJYtvtHaQ The same footage with the word "napalm" replaced with "chemical weapons". Which one is real? Personally I think "some sort of... chemical weapon" seems like an odd sentence. The first clip sounds far more natural. What is your explanation for the existence of both of these clips that share the exact same audio only in a different sequence with different operative words? One of which happens to fit a narrative the mainstream media has been pushing since before any "evidence" came to light. I would like to hear your critical analysis of these 2 pieces of footage as opposed to "Russia Today is propaganda, don't believe anything it says". |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:28.


