|
||||||||
BBC News Caught Staging FAKE News Chemical Attack In Syria |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
So it originally she said Chemical Weapons and it was doctored to her saying Napalm.
The mainstream media has made the logical fallacy of starting off with a pre-determined narrative and attempting to fit evidence around it. There is a good reason why the footage would be doctored to say "chemical weapons". Prove me wrong if you can. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
OFCOM does not regulate the BBC (not yet anyway) so they could not investigate and rule on the BBC news report. They were only able to report on any inaccuracies in the RT report..
And that doesn't strike you as suspicious in any way? That one media outlet is not subjected to the same scrutiny as another? Where is the transparency?! |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Just out of interest, why are you posting all this today when the videos are years old?
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Just out of interest, why are you posting all this today when the videos are years old?
What is your analysis of the video I posted and the reason for the doctored footage? |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
The story came to my attention today.
What is your analysis of the video I posted and the reason for the doctored footage? Why does your OP say 'footage has emerged' (making it sound like a breaking story) when this is all years old? |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I survived the killzone!
Posts: 18,247
|
Quote:
What is your evidence for this claim? The first piece of audio sounds far more natural. It also doesn't fit the narrative the mainstream media has been pushing since the beginning of the conflict.
The mainstream media has made the logical fallacy of starting off with a pre-determined narrative and attempting to fit evidence around it. There is a good reason why the footage would be doctored to say "chemical weapons". Prove me wrong if you can. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm Quote:
International law does not specifically prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets, but use against civilian populations was banned by the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in 1980. Protocol III of the CCW restricts the use of all incendiary weapons
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
I'm no fan of the BBC news, but why would they change "Napalm" to "chemical weapons"? the use of either against civilians is banned and both would be war crimes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
They probably went back and corrected the video once more info was known. That is the most logical explanation.
Why does your OP say 'footage has emerged' (making it sound like a breaking story) when this is all years old? |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
Why would they not just re-flim the segment if new information arrived? Why have they rearranged the dialogue and simply replace a single, operative word?
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Because it's a war zone, not a theatre production.
I notice you still haven't debunked that video yet... |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,479
|
Quote:
How very convenient...
And that doesn't strike you as suspicious in any way? That one media outlet is not subjected to the same scrutiny as another? Where is the transparency?! Why do you think it is suspicious? Is it a coincidence you are promoting pro-RT, anti BBC messages on the same day that Russia is caught faking athletics anti doping samples on a massive scale? |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
Not a theatre production? Tell that to the terrible BBC actors walking around like zombies pretending to be victims of chemical weapons.
I notice you still haven't debunked that video yet... |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
What is suspicious? It's always been like this, an accident of history.
Why do you think it is suspicious? Is it a coincidence you are promoting pro-RT, anti BBC messages on the same day that Russia is caught faking athletics anti doping samples on a massive scale? |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
What is suspicious? It's always been like this, an accident of history.
Why do you think it is suspicious? Is it a coincidence you are promoting pro-RT, anti BBC messages on the same day that Russia is caught faking athletics anti doping samples on a massive scale? Being an "accident of history" is a convenient excuse, not an explanation as to how the BBC is impartial despite being immune from the kind of criticism other news outlets must be subjected to. |
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
Exactly. A story years old making a comeback, and the Putin puppet army doing his work.
And I'M the conspiracy theorist!!!
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
How can it be debunked? It's real.
This is exactly what I mean when I say people believe literally anything the BBC tells them. They are practically sticking their middle fingers up to us and saying "You'll believe anything!!!". |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
The people walking around like zombies after 9/11 and 7/7, were they actors?
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
Oh well, you can't argue with an alt-right conspiracy theorist.
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
There's that buzz word being thrown around again
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
Here is a video showcasing the original and doctored footage back to back:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFPJYtvtHaQ |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
You don't see this as an alt-right conspiracy theory?
I just commented on a video where they clearly re shot the scene. The first she mentions napalm the second it's chemical weapons. |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
The people walking around like zombies after 9/11 and 7/7, were they actors?
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
You don't even know what the alt right is, merely using it as a way to shut down the thread.
I just commented on a video where they clearly re shot the scene. The first she mentions napalm the second it's chemical weapons. In no way shape or form am i trying to shut down the thread. |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
|
Quote:
Re-shot? Redubbed, surely.
In no way shape or form am i trying to shut down the thread. Out of interest do the Russians or Syrians still use phosphorus shells? Would explain why they wanted it changed from napalm to chemical weapons. Do not google image phosporus weapons if you have a weak stomach!!!! It's not the most pleasant of sights |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,057
|
Yep, they are terrible indeed.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:29.



