|
||||||||
confirmed: Russia interfered with USA elections (secret cia assessment) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#276 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
Apart from the whoosh factor, it's 2016 and Polaroids have never lost popularity, in fact in the age of completely insecure digital technology (because that is the actual reality) i'd bet their popularity increases again, it certainly has with some of their older models and Fuji still does a good trade of their instapix (or whatever their Polaroid equivalent is called). Just one high street example:
http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Browse...7C40150931.htm You really should check your information before posting... all of it... not just Polaroids. No wonder you want more evidence. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,950
|
Quote:
Lol you think the the CIA uses an £89 camera that doesn't work well at night.
No wonder you want more evidence. ![]() Useful for close quarters surveillance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,888
|
Quote:
Standard kit for every budding intel agent, easily concealed and very discreet!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: A bunker
Posts: 5,959
|
Quote:
Lol you think the the CIA uses an £89 camera that doesn't work well at night.
No wonder you want more evidence. What was it I said about checking your information? |
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
|
The only thing the Russians are guilty of is giving out true information that the Democrats wanted to hide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
The only thing the Russians are guilty of is giving out true information that the Democrats wanted to hide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,954
|
Quote:
Yes that's the claim. Interfering in an election to discredit one side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,970
|
Quote:
Lol you think the the CIA uses an £89 camera that doesn't work well at night.
No wonder you want more evidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
|
The DNC were blaming the Russians for hacking their emails months ago.
So...why did Clinton and her party tell Donald Trump that the electoral process couldn't be tampered with when he suggested that he might not accept the result? They even said that it was an attack on democracy and actually dangerous to question the validity of the election result. Why at the time didn't they say "Yes, the Russians could fix the election"? They said nothing at the time. Nothing whatsoever. They said that there was no voter fraud which could swing the election. |
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
The DNC were blaming the Russians for hacking their emails months ago.
So...why did Clinton and her party tell Donald Trump that the electoral process couldn't be tampered with when he suggested that he might not accept the result? They even said that it was an attack on democracy and actually dangerous to question the validity of the election result. Why at the time didn't they say "Yes, the Russians could fix the election"? They said nothing at the time. Nothing whatsoever. They said that there was no voter fraud which could swing the election. |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
It seems to me that much of what was given to wikileaks would have come from a disgruntled staffer because many of the leaks focused on how they conspired within to push out bernie sanders. I dont know why there is an assumption that wikileaks has relevant information on the republican party. Not very likely. Also because wikileaks will keep its sources secret it allows for this position to accuse anyone they like as there is no way to refute it. I doubt russia has much control over wikileaks even if they are allowing key figures respite in their country to avoid prosecution from the USA. Certainly this is something putin denies. He says that he has no influence over wikileaks or even much in the way of communication with them, simply allows him to stay within russia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
The only thing the Russians are guilty of is giving out true information that the Democrats wanted to hide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,970
|
Quote:
? It has nothing to do with voter fraud though. No one has accused the Russians of hacking into election results, have they.
She was a bad candidate. Better than Trump IMO, but still a bad candidate. You have what you deserve, frankly. And I say that suffering from the BS that is Brexit... |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
In which case all we're left with is weak minded Americans prepared to turn on "saviour" Hilary at the first sign of scandal.
She was a bad candidate. Better than Trump IMO, but still a bad candidate. You have what you deserve, frankly. And I say that suffering from the BS that is Brexit... Republicans wanted a candidate that would bring in conservative values. And that's what they got. |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,202
|
Quote:
When conspiracy theories come from a government or the establishment a lot of people tend to believe them.
I'm surprised that so many have forgotten the lessons learned after the war In Iraq just over a decade ago. Or maybe they didn't even learn them in the first place. Weapons of mass destruction, 45 minute warning, a 12 year olds homework used as evidence, people who had something to gain by offering evidence which was mere hearsay. And now we've got all this crap from the Democrats about 'fake' news. Which is quite ironic when most mainstream news is based around rumour, 'expert' punditry based on what they think, or reporting on what somebody has said on Twitter as news. But we're expected to blindly accept it on face value as truth without scrutiny or question. Look at the title of this thread 'Confirmed'. No evidence required, but its confirmed. It reminds me of that old episode of Brass Eye, "Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it ... but it is scientific fact" https://www.google.com/amp/www.pbs.o...-role-dnc-hack That's 18 agencies and not all Democratic friendly ones. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:57.



