Yet people still rate May far higher than Corbyn in just about every aspect. He excels in nothing. Corbyn just does and wringing and try to get the sympathy vote.

Tatchell himself is just an embarrassment, full stop

But Tatchell's message on the bombing in Syria was clear on his placards and Corbyn just mumbled and prevaricated and could not bring himself to condemn the Russians.

Corbyn just looked and sounded incoherent and about as un-statesmanlike as you could get.

Corbyn looked like right p***k there. Are you sure Shami isn't the actual leader? She seems to have risen rapidly through the ranks of a party she just joined less than a year ago.

Shami Countess Sharabbati, Abbott, Thornberry (Lady Nugee) and Corbyn, the gang of four London-centric representatives of the working man.

Harold Wilson handled it a little more strongly. Any hecklers and the large men in suits moved in and removed them. Obviously Jezza doesn't mind if his security is that lax.


Erm...you do know we don't elect Prime Ministers? It's amazing how many people don't seem to know that. She's an MP who's taken over the leadership of the party in government when the last PM resigned therefore she's PM. Like a fair number of others over the years, nost recently the calamitous Gordon Brown

They should send him to Syria to sort it out.

May was elected just like all the other Conservative M.P.s including Margaret Thatcher and like Thatcher she was chosen as leader of the Conservatives. The leader of the part in power is the Prime Minister.

An embarrassment to whom?

I cringed. I really really like Jeremy, he to me is a decent bloke, in the totally wrong job, he is just not up to hard core politics, he looked absolutely out his depth. Someone, anyone, please make him watch himself on this video, the camera never lies, and get him to step down, before the MSM make toast of him.

Not always. Churchill was not party leader when he became PM in 1940

That was a National Government in war time not a government of one or other party.

Still at least he had shameless Chakrabarti whispering legal advice in his ear - who knows how nasty it could have become if she wasn't there to tell him to allow them to speak?

A momentum cavalry charge perhaps?

And this episodes demonstrates very clearly why the totally incompetent Theresa May and her rotten party are getting off scot-free. Corbyn is a rubbish leader of the opposition. Certainly not worth 130k per year of our taxpayers money.

They might as well be Tinky Winky, Dipsy, Laa-Laa and Po for all the connection they have to most people's lives.

Just goes too show that an elected leader is not necessarily the best. Corbyn was voted in by their own members with a massive majority, they got the leader they wanted and basically deserved. They will have to lose a lot of face to remove him, he is so arrogant he will not resign, he is, after all, the very best they have, that is why Labour people voted him in.

To be fair it looks exactly like the Conservative, Liberal Democrats and UKIP were the ones who voted Corbyn, in as the best leader for Labour and and not the Labour Party.

It doesn't seem that long ago that Labour were being slaughtered in the right wing press for defeating Cameron's motion to bomb Syria

They then got slaughtered for only half-heartedly supporting Cameron's motion to bomb Syria the second time he brought it forward

(whatever happened to that 'we must bomb Syria' thing that Cameron kept banging on about ?)

Now they're getting slaughtered for not opposing the bombing of Syria

strange old world.......

How is May unelected?

I agree.

I thought Corbyn's response was the best and most dignified one possible, considering he had no time to prepare and had to think instantly on his feet.

To be fair, as they were all standing with their backs to him he couldn't see what was written on the placards.

Also at the end of the clip he is shown speaking clearly and confidently.

I don't agree and he didn't condemn the Russians

And he must have seen the placards when they walked in and surrounded him.

He's not protesting about Corbyn not being radical - he's protesting about Corbyn sticking to his pro-Russia and anti-western action line. Corbyn just reverted to his usual line comparing western action to what Russia is doing, refusing to condemn carpet and chemical bombing, and pathetically suggesting that the answer was a peacefui solution.

The Commons and the Labour party outside its Corbynite front bench are keen on action - starting with aid airdrops . But the reality is that the RAF alone lacks the ability to operate in a Russian, or even Syrian, SAM engagement zone - and Obama isn't willing to act, even with the means.

Corbyn is being opposed for being a serial Russian stooge, and doing nothing to critiicise Syrian and Russian warcrimes.

the 2013 option was Obama's plan to force the Syrian government to negotiate, and to remove its chemical warfare capability.

The vote to join coalition air operations, was to attack ISIS. There's zero equivalence between allied aircraft - dropping precision guided, small yield .low collateral damage, munitions on terrorist targets ,and the Russian and Syrian airforces and armies chucking unguided barrel bombs, chemical bombs and 3000lb bombs out of aircraft and helicopters over whole city areas. And the sort of heavy, nguided rockets being fired in barrages at towns in Syria were removed from western armed forces a decade ago because their effects were indiscriminate and likely to be illegal..

I think there's a lot of equivalence

If Cameron had actually ever intended to mount a serious bombing campaign in Syria as opposed to just going through all those Parliamentary charades just to generate anti Labour headlines in the press, it would have been British bombs raining down on Aleppo

That's where ISIS and the other Jihadists were........

You can't bomb a densely populated city like Aleppo without killing people