Originally Posted by Gill P:
“He had only done two dances before the jive!”
Sorry, but what does that have to do with anything? Why does it matter how many dances he did before the jive?
Quote:
“The cha cha cha which, being the first week, was a bit tentative but still had all the requirements. The second week he did an exquisite waltz which I found memorable!”
I was talking about the show referring to it as memorable. I don't remember them ever mentioning it afterwards, (not including when Jay would be on ITT talking about it and Karen's Choreography Corner).
Originally Posted by daziechain:
“There is no need to put in a remark that is a dig at a former contestant... no need at all. You can love a dance, think it's the best one you've seen and say all those things but why would you dismiss a previous contestant or try and trivialize their efforts. I can't remember any other time that's happened and yes, I do think that Jay is as entitled as any other Strictly celeb to be respected.”
How was it a dig?

They didn't say anything bad about Jay's jive at the time last year, and they didn't say anything bad about it after Ore danced it. Saying "move over, Jay" isn't saying that they thought it was bad. Also, they referred to the "holy trinity of jives", adding Ore's jive in with Jill's and Jay's. Hardly a negative comment. Len has also said that Jay's jive was one of his most memorable dances from any series. But let's not let facts get in the way.
It is perfectly acceptable to both love two different things. It's like someone saying, "I love them both, but if I had to choose, I'd pick this one over that one. It's not making a dig at the latter over the former; just saying which one you prefer.