Originally Posted by Projectionist:
“The only thing he did, was the let the Public decide the answer to a question that was splitting parliament & the UK in half - that's democracy for you. .”
“The only thing he did, was the let the Public decide the answer to a question that was splitting parliament & the UK in half - that's democracy for you. .”
David Cameron's legacy is a shop soiled referendum result.
The legislation setting up the referendum was shoddy. The legislation provided for a referendum that was neither legally binding nor was there any reference to Article 50 whatsoever. Nor was there provision for an exit process, in the result of a 'leave' vote.
The referendum campaign's project fear has been replaced by tautological or meaningless bluster. Before 23 June, there was the "punishment budget" or a collapse in the economy or unemployment. A hard or soft Brexit was never mentioned. After 23 June, it's been 'Brexit means Brexit' or 'Red, white and blue Brexit' and 'no running commentary'.
So now we have a referendum result unsupported by a government plan, process or policy. Mr Cameron was clear: a vote to leave the EU was a vote to leave the Single Market. But in her 5 months as prime minister, Theresa May hasn't once confirmed that the UK will be leaving the Singe Market. Voters are confused because the government is confused.
Moreover, the article 50 legal process for leaving is untried, untested and unknown. Little wonder that an ongoing UK legal dispute could be followed by a separate legal dispute starting in the Irish courts and going to the European Court of Justice.
As the Economist magazine predicts for the UK in 2017: "A compromise Brexit settlement will need popular ratification, either via a new referendum or early elections. Hardline leave voters will feel betrayed"
Either the process, timescale, sheer complexity, outcome or lack of a democratic right of reply will leave many fed up, frustrated or betrayed. There will be tears.



