|
||||||||
The End of the Referendum? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 47°9′ S, 126°43′ W
Posts: 2,948
|
Quote:
Switzerland's population appears to be better educated than ours, though, and can be trusted to vote after having ensured that they are in full possession of the facts. They also don't have scandalously bad "campaigns" like Vote Leave.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
|
I think it's more a case that we don't do them often enough, so the few we've had tend to become a way of protesting against something the referendum isn't strictly about.
Plus you'd expect the government (local or otherwise) to be better at wording them and planning for all possible outcomes if they had more practice. Of course I'm assuming here a level of competence that this government has never demonstrated ever, but I'm optimistic like that. Even Old Etonians must retain some capacity to learn from their mistakes? Though it's unlikely they really have the willingness to clear up after themselves, as Cameron and Osborne so aptly demonstrated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
Quote:
This being the argument that she is a dictator....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
BIB, you mean Vote Remain don't you?.
At least they weren't pushing for a terrible outcome based on absolute lies and spin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
|
Quote:
.... she's a Tory. They have systematically removed our liberties over the last six and a half years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,901
|
Quote:
.... she's a Tory. They have systematically removed our liberties over the last six and a half years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
|
Quote:
The EU referendum is a really bad example of a successful referendum because it was worded in such a way that no one knew exactly what changes would result from a Leave vote (and still no one knows) and both sides' campaigns were entirely based on half-truths and outright falsehoods.
Maybe we should try again with a proposition that is fully drafted and costed and supported only by factual documents and, if that one works, take it from there. the factual documents are the same expert projections that Leave rubbished - as they showed the downside to going. You can't even ask the current issue what should take priority - immigration control or free access to markets in Europe - because its a matter of how much of both you can get . |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 10,733
|
Quote:
Really? What liberties have you lost?
If you cannot challenge your accuser then pretty much its a system where the state can rule by defacto power. Just got to hope a few judges will be not impressed and actually make some sort of pain for the government but thats a long hope really
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,801
|
Quote:
Referendums are fine if you know the result, and its unlikely to change . If its two thirds, or 60-40 one way, its a way to shut the minority up . If circumstances don't change, you would expect the outcome not to change - as the logic doesn't. Nuclear weapons are not going anywhere for the next 50-80 years, , so its unlikely that a 65-35 vote, to keep them, will change. Issues like hanging are also unlikely to see a swing back in favour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,606
|
Countries like Ireland and Switzerland who regularly hold referendums would never put something as vast as EU membership on a ballot paper as a 'yes' or 'no' option. They would instinctively know it was a recipe for disaster and something that could do serious longterm damage to their country. Repealing one law by referendum is fine, but not thousands of laws and directives in one fell swoop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,916
|
Quote:
This being the argument that she is a dictator as she merely wished to move ahead with the decision of the electorate who voted in a referendum in which 36 million people turned out - a referendum which parliament voted for in the first place presumably on the assumption the result would be respected otherwise why bother.
Not sure what your idea of a dictator is - but it doesnt normally involve implementing the democratic decision of the electorate following a national vote of the people. Another piece of remoaner hyperbole!
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,941
|
Great thread. It's tricky what to conclude from it, anything you conclude is biased by what you think of the Brexit result. For instance, my view is possibly that the referendum ought to have had clear 'victory' conditions. I know the result was 52:48 but it could equally have been 50.9:49.1. And then what do you do? The population is a schizophrenic snake, insufficient to dictate one way or another the result. That's why Scotland's referendum might have the right idea of putting it at 55% the result to start the actions of making Scotland independent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West London
Posts: 24,303
|
Quote:
You can't do that though. Because what we get is decided by the Eu not us . Do you want A or B can't be asked - when we will be denied B, and given X.
the factual documents are the same expert projections that Leave rubbished - as they showed the downside to going. You can't even ask the current issue what should take priority - immigration control or free access to markets in Europe - because its a matter of how much of both you can get . And actually, why couldn't we have had a referendum on the actual outcome of leaving the EU? If the government had triggered Article 50, negotiated all the terms and then put it to the vote, we would have been voting for or against the planned outcome not the unplanned consequences. People keep citing Switzerland, but I doubt that the Swiss would put a nebulous proposition to the vote the way our government did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,892
|
Quote:
... For instance, my view is possibly that the referendum ought to have had clear 'victory' conditions. ...
And maybe a better question, or clear stated 'what it will mean' published before the event to save us all from the 'yes but what flavour'... This one was so deficient - and everyone who voted it through parliament (and/or failed to submit/support corrective amendments) takes a share of that blame, regardless of why it came into being. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,994
|
Quote:
Was never in favour of Refs. This recent one confirms why. I hope we never have another one. They are so divisive.
The lesson to the body politic is perhaps that they must either completely suppress democratic choice (the preferred policy of the EU and British governments heretofore) or they should aim to bring the electorate with them. The sudden venting of the political head of steam after 40 years (since the last referendum on Europe) was almost bound to burn fingers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,481
|
I think it pointed up just what a lying lot politicians are.
The referendum lies, threats and promises (from both sides) should be put on advertising hoardings at every election as a reminder to the electorate of just how utterly contemptible politicians as a breed are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,994
|
Quote:
Great thread. It's tricky what to conclude from it, anything you conclude is biased by what you think of the Brexit result. For instance, my view is possibly that the referendum ought to have had clear 'victory' conditions. I know the result was 52:48 but it could equally have been 50.9:49.1. And then what do you do? The population is a schizophrenic snake, insufficient to dictate one way or another the result. That's why Scotland's referendum might have the right idea of putting it at 55% the result to start the actions of making Scotland independent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,994
|
Quote:
I think it pointed up just what a lying lot politicians are.
The referendum lies, threats and promises (from both sides) should be put on advertising hoardings at every election as a reminder to the electorate of just how utterly contemptible politicians as a breed are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,481
|
Quote:
Well, in reality it was mixed bag wasn't it. There were various dubious claims touted on both sides. The were also well reasoned and honest views expressed from both sides too. But that's just the nature of the electoral process. We as voters are required to apply critical thinking to the various choices on offer.
Something along the lines of "Politicians are under no obligation to tell the truth." |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,437
|
Quote:
Good points. I voted for Brexit. Nevertheless I think that results of referendums should be required to reach some agreed set of thresholds to be deemed valid. It could be something like: at least 50% of the electorate need to vote, and of the 50% who voted at least 60% of them must have voted for or against the proposed motion. If these thresholds are not met then the issue would be deemed undecided.
If it's a major and irreversible change, then I think a 55% threshold of those voting for the change would be sensible, otherwise we stick with the status quo for the time being. I wouldn't insist that a majority of the electorate have to vote for it to be valid though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West London
Posts: 24,303
|
Quote:
Well, in reality it was mixed bag wasn't it. There were various dubious claims touted on both sides. The were also well reasoned and honest views expressed from both sides too. But that's just the nature of the electoral process. We as voters are required to apply critical thinking to the various choices on offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,941
|
Quote:
And I think you'll have a lot of people agreeing with that! A clearly defined margin to determine what would constitute a decision, whether or not it was binding, and maybe even some form of timescale on government action/response.
And maybe a better question, or clear stated 'what it will mean' published before the event to save us all from the 'yes but what flavour'... This one was so deficient - and everyone who voted it through parliament (and/or failed to submit/support corrective amendments) takes a share of that blame, regardless of why it came into being. Quote:
Good points. I voted for Brexit. Nevertheless I think that results of referendums should be required to reach some agreed set of thresholds to be deemed valid. It could be something like: at least 50% of the electorate need to vote, and of the 50% who voted at least 60% of them must have voted for or against the proposed motion. If these thresholds are not met then the issue would be deemed undecided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,994
|
Quote:
In an election, yes, but should views (as opposed to facts) form the bulk of the data supplied to voters in a referendum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,994
|
It's interesting that many Remainers seem to feel cheated in that they believe many people voted Brexit on the basis of lies they were spun. Now, I don't know how many other brexiters feel this way, but I felt perfectly aware when politicians on my side of the argument were being less than truthful. But just because people make fallacious arguments in favour of some particular point of view doesn't necessarily negate the validity of that argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West London
Posts: 24,303
|
Quote:
We need both. "Facts" in this context are perhaps better described as "claims". We need to be aware that claims might even be true but also that they will have been selected, spun, interpreted to suit the argument of the claimant. Again this comes back to the requirement of critical assessment on the part of the voter.
In other words, don't have referendums on issues that will result in more arguments after than before. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.



