|
||||||||
I do not believe it! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,376
|
Quote:
I agree, that what's obvious to me and to many others might not be obvious to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
How? By whom? The judges marked Louise bottom of the leader board. She must have got the public votes. Are you saying the public are 'manipulating' the vote. Talk sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,387
|
everyone seems to have forgotten that Alesha Dixon was also 2nd on the LB out of the last 4 couples but ended up in the DO like Danny
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
Quote:
This was a shocker of a result as far as I'm concerned. However, the fault is down to the Great British Public. Claudia and Danny were both in the dance off because the public voted for Louise instead. End of Story.
Quote:
If I was going to see the Tour I'd expect the winner to be part of that tour, the only one not doing the tour is Claudia, so she was manipulated not Louise, my opinion was that Louise was the poorer dancer on Saturday.
It might be your opinion that Louise was the poorer dancer (and indeed I agree), but clearly many of the public didn't share that opinion and voted for her. Nothing more and nothing less. The tie on the leaderboard made it more likely that whoever out of Claudia and Louise did better in the public vote would avoid the dance-off, so clearly if they were fixing it they didn't do a good job of it... Quote:
everyone seems to have forgotten that Alesha Dixon was also 2nd on the LB out of the last 4 couples but ended up in the DO like Danny
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
This was a shocker of a result as far as I'm concerned. However, the fault is down to the Great British Public. Claudia and Danny were both in the dance off because the public voted for Louise instead. End of Story.
As for Danny - I agree, that's tough. Not enough people voted for him and he nearly left because of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,979
|
Quote:
Claudia was doomed the moment she didn't finish top which I think is slightly unfair, particularly at this stage of proceedings. She could have finished second in the vote and still left.
As for Danny - I agree, that's tough. Not enough people voted for him and he nearly left because of it. |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,848
|
Quote:
I think Danny is a fabulous dancer and I have fully expected him to win from the start.
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leicester!!!
Posts: 13,034
|
Quote:
It might be your opinion that Louise was the poorer dancer (and indeed I agree), but clearly many of the public didn't share that opinion and voted for her.
People may have voted for Louise because they are supporters of Harry and Jamie and would vote for her anyway regardless of how well or weak she danced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Up the creek, no paddle.
Posts: 2,103
|
Quote:
People vote for who they like even if they think they didn't dance well or were terrible. How else do you explain Ed Balls getting so far?
People may have voted for Louise because they are supporters of Harry and Jamie and would vote for her anyway regardless of how well or weak she danced. And I don't give a flying fig (being polite) about Jamie or Harry. I like Louise, she appeals and I actually enjoy her dancing. Lot of assumptions here, Hunk. |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,773
|
Quote:
Well maybe but maybe not. I voted last night for the first time in 7 years or so. I registed specifically to vote 3 times for Ore because I was sick and tired of reading nasty and in my view unjustified comments about him and Joanne (and Cliftons generally). So if others became as exasperated as I did and did similarly that may have tipped the balance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leicester!!!
Posts: 13,034
|
Quote:
I never voted for Ed but some of his dances were highly entertaining.
And I don't give a flying fig (being polite) about Jamie or Harry. I like Louise, she appeals and I actually enjoy her dancing. Lot of assumptions here, Hunk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
We do. Public vote takes precedence remember? Ore must have out-polled Danny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,773
|
Quote:
i think that hell will need to freeze over, or time will have to be turned back before (some on) the board will accept that Ore and Louise BOTH got more votes than danny.
<snigger>
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
|
Quote:
That's what it is supposed to look like. However, the fact that Ore was twice in the dance-off in the previous weeks and did not do anything groundbreaking this weekend to suddenly become the public's favorite makes the scenario you mentioned extremely unlikely. Most probably, the marking manipulation was not enough to ensure Ore's advance to the final and there was voting manipulation as well.
It's going to have to be faced. Ore outpolled Danny or Claudia and possibly both. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
|
Quote:
I don't really understand why that's so difficult to comprehend
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
That's what it is supposed to look like. However, the fact that Ore was twice in the dance-off in the previous weeks and did not do anything groundbreaking this weekend to suddenly become the public's favorite makes the scenario you mentioned extremely unlikely. Most probably, the marking manipulation was not enough to ensure Ore's advance to the final and there was voting manipulation as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
It's done by an independent company.
It's going to have to be faced. Ore outpolled Danny or Claudia and possibly both. |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
We do. Public vote takes precedence remember? Ore must have out-polled Danny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
|
Quote:
That's what it is supposed to look like. However, the fact that Ore was twice in the dance-off in the previous weeks and did not do anything groundbreaking this weekend to suddenly become the public's favorite makes the scenario you mentioned extremely unlikely. Most probably, the marking manipulation was not enough to ensure Ore's advance to the final and there was voting manipulation as well.
In the first place some people will vote one week and the next not even see the show. At this time of year with works parties etc it is very likely people will miss a show and not vote. Some people pick a favourite at some point in the series and will vote for them come thick and thin. They would vote even if their favourite danced like the back end of a pantomime donkey. Others vote for the dance they liked best that night. Some weeks they may vote for one person and other weeks for another. In some weeks they may not enjoy any dances and not vote at all. Some will vote for whoever they see as the one in trouble who needs the votes that night or the series underdog. Others will vote strategically or vote in an 'anybody but' way. Finally there will be people who get fed up with all the conspiracy theories and slurs against contestants and get behind someone who has become the whipping boy of the vocal minority. Just because Ore got more votes this week does not mean he became the public favourite overnight. The vote distribution will inevitably change week on week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Said who?
If you are claiming something else happened with the voting then you are accusing them of lying about the public vote to get a particular result. Do you really think they would risk that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
Your logic would make sense if the same people voted every week and voted the same way every week. However they don't.
In the first place some people will vote one week and the next not even see the show. At this time of year with works parties etc it is very likely people will miss a show and not vote. Some people pick a favourite at some point in the series and will vote for them come thick and thin. They would vote even if their favourite danced like the back end of a pantomime donkey. Others vote for the dance they liked best that night. Some weeks they may vote for one person and other weeks for another. In some weeks they may not enjoy any dances and not vote at all. Some will vote for whoever they see as the one in trouble who needs the votes that night or the series underdog. Others will vote strategically or vote in an 'anybody but' way. Finally there will be people who get fed up with all the conspiracy theories and slurs against contestants and get behind someone who has become the whipping boy of the vocal minority. Just because Ore got more votes this week does not mean he became the public favourite overnight. The vote distribution will inevitably change week on week. There's also positioning in the show, whats on elsewhere, musical choice, an awful lot of gullible voters who just vote for the Leaderboard at this stage , and a group of voters who haven't caught on and vote for whoever is at the bottom to save them. There's also a mothering vote who can't see a grown man crying like a three year old without voting for them, and a group that fall for any journey story thats thrown at them often enough - however true it is, and however, short the journey.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
|
Quote:
The other complication is that there may have been only 3 votes in it, and they may have been Balls supporters continuing to vote for whoever was worst.
There's also positioning in the show, whats on elsewhere, musical choice, an awful lot of gullible voters who just vote for the Leaderboard at this stage , and a group of voters who haven't caught on and vote for whoever is at the bottom to save them. There's also a mothering vote who can't see a grown man crying like a three year old without voting for them, and a group that fall for any journey story thats thrown at them often enough - however true it is, and however, short the journey.. I wonder if people get as upset when Ian Hislop loses yet again to Paul Merton on a very unfathomable marking system. Or when Alan Davies finishes last time after time in QI having been lured into traps that push his points into minus territory. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
All the "Clifton bashing" people talk about (which is as juvenile, stupid and immature a phrase as "haters gonna hate" is about the BIAS not about any of them personally, even though I concede each of them have things about them that irritate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
All the "Clifton bashing" people talk about (which is as juvenile, stupid and immature a phrase as "haters gonna hate" is about the BIAS not about any of them personally, even though I concede each of them have things about them that irritate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,401
|
Quote:
I don't have a problem with the CLiftons, especially Jo as she seems really nice, the only thing I can see that might trigger some criticisms is Kevin getting four excellent dancers four years running
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30.





