|
||||||||
Will the X Factor get in trouble over Little Mix outfits on tonights show |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,532
|
Women have more to offer than sex.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,076
|
Quote:
Women have more to offer than sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
|
Quote:
Then why wear such outfits and such body movements? They can be less sexual in their performance, if they wanted to, and they would show people a different image. Surely, their performance image is very different to who they really are, as they won't be wearing such outfits in their normal daily life in the street, unless they do
.Also how sexual they are is partly in the eye of the beholder, don't you think? Quote:
Adele isn't a manufactured talent show pop star. Its nowhere near a fair comparison.
Quote:
I agree but it wont sell in the charts, where almost every song is normally about someones love life.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,352
|
Quote:
Well im not complaining. But i think some people are not going to be happy about what Little Mix was wearing tonight as they looked like they forgot to put their clothes on
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,076
|
mgvsmith; Quote:
Your generalisations didn't mention origins...also Adele is a product of the Brit School like Jessie J. So how manufactured is manufactured anyway? How did Motown discover their acts? And there is a label that made a point of managing their artists images.
1. I'm not sure how people having different things to contend with based on where they start from would have escaped your notice.2. In her first single Jessie J was grabbing her crotch and squatting or did you miss that? 3. Motown was 50 years ago. I'm talking about now. Quote:
Some songs are about sex, many are about relationships. These are core areas of social life, I would expect popular songs to be about those things.
As would i. Its what sells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,532
|
Quote:
mgvsmith;
1. I'm not sure how people having different things to contend with based on where they start from would have escaped your notice. 2. In her first single Jessie J was grabbing her crotch and squatting or did you miss that? 3. Motown was 50 years ago. I'm talking about now. As would i. Its what sells. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: tamworth,england
Posts: 2,698
|
Quote:
As the comment above says above Little Mix had the biggest UK arena tour this year and it wasn't because of their sexy image which is irrelevant to their audience.
Check out Adele on the image is everything in pop argument. I honestly don't think that there's a Pop singer out there that doesn't have tons of admirers for their looks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
|
They're just clothes and if parents have an issue with it, just tell your kids they were pretending they were at the beach! People show a lot more flesh in general there and no-one bats an eyelid, whether its young women or grannies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
|
Quote:
With lyrics and media stories about their sex lives being the main commodity they're selling i don't think them all dancing in granny pants is the biggest worry.
Quote:
The double standards are irrelevant. What matters is the way things are, not the way you wish they were and in reality pop is all about image.
Quote:
1. I'm not sure how people having different things to contend with based on where they start from would have escaped your notice.
Quote:
2. In her first single Jessie J was grabbing her crotch and squatting or did you miss that?
Quote:
3. Motown was 50 years ago. I'm talking about now.
Pop may have been more visualized since the advent of music TV in the 1980s. Quote:
As would i. Its what sells.
Quote:
BIB, there are alot of people that find Adele attractive.
I honestly don't think that there's a Pop singer out there that doesn't have tons of admirers for their looks. |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
Quote:
As pointed out by others, don't confuse sex lives with relationships and many of their songs are tongue in cheek.
That doesn't answer the question. If image is so important in Pop (which It Is) then origins are irrelevant. You see what you want to see.......clearly. Well pop is a lot older than now. And image has aways been an issue. I mentioned Motown because it was manufactured pop of high quality where the producers tried to control the image of the artists and did so to some affect. But they tried to sell their female artists and groups on a deliberately wholesome image and it worked to a large degree, LM have paid homage to Motown in a few of their songs. Pop may have been more visualized since the advent of music TV in the 1980s. My point is that it is a complicated relationship between image and pop. At times there are dual standards applied to women and men when it comes to attractiveness. Jesy out of LM has had some vile comments made about her body image over the last 5 years, so in a way if she he is recognized as sexy now, there is a degree of triumph to that. Olly Murs, James Arthur, Elton John, Phil Collins, Matt Cardle (if he still has fans), Bono, Iggy Pop, Sam Smith......not obviously attractive but once you are in the public eye, your attractiveness quotient tends to increase anyway. |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,326
|
I don't see why they should complain, if I looked like that I'd flaunt it too lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
|
Quote:
I would never buy any music just because an artist looks attractive. It's all about the music for me. If it's good I buy it, and if it's not I don't. Simple really.
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
|
Quote:
I don't see why they should complain, if I looked like that I'd flaunt it too lol
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,189
|
Little Mix have every right to wear what they want. I do think its ironic though that Mixers were slating Fifth Harmony earlier this year over the Work from Home and All in My Head videos. I guess its okay when your favourite is doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,076
|
Quote:
BIB - Songs about sex and songs about relationships are not the same thing.
Unless of course the relationships being sung about are with family members and friends but most pop songs these days aren't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Posts: 16,585
|
Really?
I mean in 2016 people are seriously pulling this crap, they worry about the influence these young women and their clothes will have on children... and not the general everyday hell we live these days? |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Posts: 16,585
|
Quote:
Little Mix have every right to wear what they want. I do think its ironic though that Mixers were slating Fifth Harmony earlier this year over the Work from Home and All in My Head videos. I guess its okay when your favourite is doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,189
|
Quote:
Isn't that more to do with the fact, Fifth Harmony parade themselves as objects for males while Little Mix do it to empower other females?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,076
|
Quote:
Isn't that more to do with the fact, Fifth Harmony parade themselves as objects for males while Little Mix do it to empower other females?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,532
|
Quote:
They are when the relationship you're talking about is the one with the person or people you either are sleeping with, used to be sleeping with or want to sleep with.
Unless of course the relationships being sung about are with family members and friends but most pop songs these days aren't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,808
|
I find their stage act very aggressive, all that pulling faces into the camera and the head shaking with the hair going from side to side.
Those big knickered leotards are not very nice either. And I don't think it's very classy to write and perform negative songs about your ex with graphic lyrics, especially when a large part of their audience are young kids. So there! |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,076
|
Quote:
No, they aren't the same thing. Even if the relationship you are singing about is a sexual/romantic one, sex is only one aspect of it.
That is the ones who aren't too busy drooling over the latest outfits, or lack of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,454
|
The threads get worse and worse all the time on here lol.
People going on about young kids watching. They should of been in bed at that time anyways
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
|
I think if parents are worried that Little Mix's outfits are corrupting their children then they're doing parenting wrong!
They're young women dressing how they want to, nothing more, nothing less. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:49.




.