No just bored of remainers who are always highlighting the negative and none of the positive news we are getting.

Rubbishing our country and running it down - time they believed in Britain!

Yes, but we were also promised 350m a week and you certainly aren't getting that.

Massive misperception there.

We did listen and we voted leave because that is what we wanted to do.

The warnings were of no consequence they were warnings without substance they still are.

No we weren't.

We believe in a Britain that can help shape Europe to be a better place instead of one that runs away from its closest neighbours as soon as they're told by foreigners that it's getting difficult.

That remains to be seen while we are still members.

Read the official leave leaflet, it's mentioned many times; and there's this:

http://news.images.itv.com/image/file/978061/img.jpg

It does but you have proved my point they have no substance because it is might be, could be whatifferys.

So growth isn't down, billions of taxpayer cash not pumped in to private firms to keep the economy going, growth down anyway, inflation not up, the pound isn't down?

That's the substance.

But it didn't say the NHS would get £350 million it suggested that if we didn't give the EU that amount we could fund the NHS more in the annual national budget.

Read it again.

It said we could give the £350m to the NHS instead of the EU. Though of course we don't pay £350m to the EU.

It's an imperative form of the verb. An order, if you like. Very useful in advertising. Says exactly what it claims.

I didn't mention the NHS, just the 350m.

The NHS thing is true, we CAN give them more money that isn't used to fund the EU.. but that isn't up to Nigel Farage or Vote Leave, that is up to the government where they spend that extra dosh.

Farage said on Question Time the figure wasn't accurate but it was in the 100 millions we will have spare not paying the EU.

But there never was 350m to spend on anything in the first place.

And places like Cornwall, despite voting out, still want their 60m a year.

Don't forget south Wales!
The area that became an impoverished basket case under 'believe in Britain', until the EU had to intervene with Objective One!

Now going back to grovelling to tory english governments!... which will do sod all as they have done for 200 years.

You are in the school of "say it often enough and people will believe my lies".

Already on this thread, you have quoted that we were PROMISED £350m.
You have also said that a Leave vote would not necessarily take us out of the single market.

Please stop with your lies.

No one promised anything about where our contributions would end up.
But, you will accept that Cameron, Osborne, Gove, Johnson, Gisela Stuart and many others PROMISED you that a Leave vote would see the country leave the single market.

Now maybe Mrs May will negotiate the EU into free trade deals but that's up to the EU.

£350m a WEEK vs £60m a YEAR.

I think the country can find some money for the Cornish.

Soon after the referendum, Carswell suggested that £100m would go to the NHS.
Wouldn't people rather spend that money on UK hospitals rather than on French farmers?

Nope, not changed my mind in fact more than ever do I believe the single market and FoM is compatible with Brexit.

Unfortunately, the confusion appears to be from the Remoaners as a way to fragment the leave vote...... we'll just have to see if it works.

<sigh> Other counties are available.

Oh please. The fragmentation has always been there and is worse than in any other vote.

All three (and I only have three) of my friends who voted leave are regretting it on the simple grounds that they disagree with the lack of statement guaranteeing the right to stay and live in the UK for EU citizens already here. In fact, they now call Vote.Leave liars as Gisela Stuart and BoJo said that rights would be guaranteed. One of them said they will pledge money if the case of deceiving the public will go to court.

Credit where credit is due though for Gisela Stuart - she is campaigning like no one else to make sure this happens, unfortunately she has no power.

But both of those are true. Leave said we would have an extra £350m to spend if we left the EU. And the Leave vote didn't mean we'd have to be out of the single market, though many expected that to be the case.

Look at the top of the "Why vote leave" page on the official leave campaign website:

"We will be able to save 350m a week"

http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/why_vote_leave.html

No, we won't.

And that is true. Norway are in the single market but are not in the EU. We could, as the referendum suggested, "Leave the EU" and still remain in the single market.

Like I say, just like leave PROMISED that we could save 350m a week.

Maybe she will, but I suspect she doesn't want to go down in history as the PM who ignored almost every credible economic commentator and damaged the UK economy by taking us out of the single market.