Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9
”
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9
”
Post of the thread.
Told you Claudia wouldn't win she's not touring
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Mrs Checks:
“Alesha didn't do the tour and yet not only did she win, they made her a bloody judge!
I will never subscribe to this theory.”
“Alesha didn't do the tour and yet not only did she win, they made her a bloody judge!
I will never subscribe to this theory.”
The Tour then was not the huge moneymaking machine it is now.
Originally Posted by Steve9214:
“The Tour then was not the huge moneymaking machine it is now.”
“The Tour then was not the huge moneymaking machine it is now.”
The tour is nothing to do with BBC.
Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9”
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9
”
Don't start about Darcey's marking, that will set everyone off again.
Originally Posted by DiamondDoll:
“The tour is nothing to do with BBC.”
“The tour is nothing to do with BBC.”
Strictly is still owned by BBC and who ever has the tour franchise will be paying Royalties on the earnings, it's still connected.
Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9”
“Well Darcey didn't think it merit a 10, this is why she only gave him a 9
”
She knows Danny in particular is a big threat to her fave Ore (as was Claudia on last night's perfirmance, her QS was miles better than his) so did what she could to put him in danger. Her bias & hypocrisy was blatant last night, she really went down in my estimation.
Why do controversies keep being invented where there is none?
Claudia was in the B2 because not enough viewers voted for her.
Danny was in the B2 because not enough viewers voted for him.
The judges had to choose between the 2 - no contest.
Nothing to do with who is, or who is not, touring. The judges really couldn't care, and neither could the beeb.
Claudia was in the B2 because not enough viewers voted for her.
Danny was in the B2 because not enough viewers voted for him.
The judges had to choose between the 2 - no contest.
Nothing to do with who is, or who is not, touring. The judges really couldn't care, and neither could the beeb.
Originally Posted by strictly_fan2:
“She knows Danny in particular is a big threat to her fave Ore (as was Claudia on last night's perfirmance, her QS was miles better than his) so did what she could to put him in danger. Her bias & hypocrisy was blatant last night, she really went down in my estimation.”
“She knows Danny in particular is a big threat to her fave Ore (as was Claudia on last night's perfirmance, her QS was miles better than his) so did what she could to put him in danger. Her bias & hypocrisy was blatant last night, she really went down in my estimation.”
Oh dear god, grow up! If she'd wanted to do all she could to put him in danger she'd have given him an 8 as Craig did Ore and given 10s to every other dancer as Bruno (nearly) did. There is only one reason that he was in the dance-off and that's the public voting in favour of Louise. When Danny doesn't win on Saturday, I trust that your apology to Darcy will be every bit as fulsome as this ridiculous charge has been spiteful!
Why would her not doing the tour effect anything?
I would imagine people buy tickets for the tour to see their favourite dancers and dances again. So a Danny Ore or Louise fan woudn't care if Claudia won, if they wanted to see them dance again they would buy tickets anyway.
I was tempted to buy tickets this year after Ed announced he would be doing the tour, and he didn't stand a chance in hell of winning.
I would imagine people buy tickets for the tour to see their favourite dancers and dances again. So a Danny Ore or Louise fan woudn't care if Claudia won, if they wanted to see them dance again they would buy tickets anyway.
I was tempted to buy tickets this year after Ed announced he would be doing the tour, and he didn't stand a chance in hell of winning.
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“Kellie wasn't on the tour last year.”
“Kellie wasn't on the tour last year.”
Tsk. Never let the truth stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory
Originally Posted by Gandolf:
“Bring back the 4 man final(”
“Bring back the 4 man final(”
Well you can blame Will Young for that not being the case. If he hadn't strutted off for no obvious reason there would have been someone for Claudia to potentially beat in the semi.
Originally Posted by Gandolf:
“Strangely enough Danny, Louise and Ore are all touring funny that, Same as Kellie last year. What a stitch up the only 2 dancers i look forward to seeing every week are Claudia and Danny. Craig was the only person scoring correctly at the weekend. Darcy put Danny in the DO with her 9.
Bring back the 4 man final i was really looking forward to Claudia's show dance now nobody will ever see it
”
“Strangely enough Danny, Louise and Ore are all touring funny that, Same as Kellie last year. What a stitch up the only 2 dancers i look forward to seeing every week are Claudia and Danny. Craig was the only person scoring correctly at the weekend. Darcy put Danny in the DO with her 9.
Bring back the 4 man final i was really looking forward to Claudia's show dance now nobody will ever see it
”
I'm sorry, but that's complete and utter rubbish.
1. The winner doesn't always tour - Alesha didn't and she was one of the most popular winners ever.
2. The finalists don't always tour - Kellie and Susanna, for example.
3. The public alone decides the winner, and the judges have let plenty of non-touring dancers through the to final in previous years, so pretty much every year there's a risk that the winner won't tour.
4. There's a little word called opinion which applies to all of this - you think the scores were wrong, the judges disagreed - guess what, that's called having two different opinions. It's all subjective, it can only be subjective, and it's nothing different to how the show's worked since day 1.
Originally Posted by Mystical123:
“I'm sorry, but that's complete and utter rubbish.
1. The winner doesn't always tour - Alesha didn't and she was one of the most popular winners ever.
2. The finalists don't always tour - Kellie and Susanna, for example.
3. The public alone decides the winner, and the judges haven let plenty of non-touring dancers through the to final in previous years, so pretty much every year there's a risk that the winner won't tour.
4. There's a little word called opinion which applies to all of this - you think the scores were wrong, the judges disagreed - guess what, that's called having two different opinions. It's all subjective, it can only be subjective, and it's nothing different to how the show's worked since day 1.”
“I'm sorry, but that's complete and utter rubbish.
1. The winner doesn't always tour - Alesha didn't and she was one of the most popular winners ever.
2. The finalists don't always tour - Kellie and Susanna, for example.
3. The public alone decides the winner, and the judges haven let plenty of non-touring dancers through the to final in previous years, so pretty much every year there's a risk that the winner won't tour.
4. There's a little word called opinion which applies to all of this - you think the scores were wrong, the judges disagreed - guess what, that's called having two different opinions. It's all subjective, it can only be subjective, and it's nothing different to how the show's worked since day 1.”
Ah, those two lovely words: subjective and opinion. Funny how they go out the window when it comes to alternative FM opinions.
Originally Posted by madetomeasure:
“Ah, those two lovely words: subjective and opinion. Funny how they go out the window when it comes to alternative FM opinions.”
“Ah, those two lovely words: subjective and opinion. Funny how they go out the window when it comes to alternative FM opinions.”
No, they go out the window when people are masquerading incorrect facts as opinions. It is an undeniable fact that not all winners and finalists have done the tour, therefore any argument that the judges deny places in the final to those not doing the tour is simply factually incorrect.
2 of 2
