|
||||||||
ED - Could the Daily Mail get things any more wrong? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 248
|
ED - Could the Daily Mail get things any more wrong?
Sorry if this is a spoiler but I am not sure how to actually do a spoiler! However, given the wording of the article, it would only be a spoiler if it was correct!
The Daily Mail have done an excellent article today, see excerpt below: "She told Best magazine: Ashley hits baby Max, but it’s only accidental, and Laurel is thinking, "I must keep my family together." 'But everyone around her – her dad, Doug and Diane – are saying, "You can’t stay, you’re unsafe" and finally she thinks the only she can do is keep Max in a room so he’s safe, because got to go across the road and get some nappies." So, not only does Laurel not have a baby called Max (nor does anybody in the soap) but then Ashley turns into Max in the second paragraph when Lauren locks him in the bedroom (already happened). Obviously there are no sub editors at the Daily Fail any more. Very bad. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,054
|
The first rules of journalism are, If you don't know the truth make it up, and never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: woking
Posts: 21,681
|
Very odd usually tv soap reporters are quite invested in their product and do their best to get it right and find spoilers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,054
|
Quote:
Very odd usually tv soap reporters are quite invested in their product and do their best to get it right and find spoilers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: woking
Posts: 21,681
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29.

