|
||||||||
Is anybody else sick of the Radfords?? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 3,296
|
Quote:
They've been on channel 5 several times, and been featured in many magazines and newspapers
They were on This Morning today They have their own website Same here. I do sometimes watch channel five but like with everything I watch, the TV only goes on when I'm watching something specific that I want to watch then I stop watching. I keep up to date with the news but not by reading newspapers. I don't read magazine's either. Seems they aren't as well known as was thought.... On DS anyway. The majority of us here have never heard of them. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,206
|
They look a nice bunch to me, what's the issue?
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
|
I didn't bother reading this thread until now because I've never heard of the Radfords. The first page is funny.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11,311
|
Quote:
Quote:
I only watch stuff on kodi and don't buy magazines so I guess that's why I've never heard of them. Quote:
They've been on channel 5 several times, and been featured in many magazines and newspapers
They were on This Morning today They have their own website I think it's safe to say it's very easy to not have heard of them. I don't think I've ever watched any thing on Channel 5 and the last time I watched This Morning was when I was trapped at home as a new mother in the Richard and Judy days. I'd love to know what magazines and newspapers they are in though. Mainly so I can continue to avoid them
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,892
|
Congratulations to the OP for bringing them to a wider audience
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 30,190
|
Quote:
They've been on channel 5 several times, and been featured in many magazines and newspapers
They were on This Morning today They have their own website I clicked on the thread to find out who they are. The obvious question is why didn't the OP provide any information. |
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: lancashire uk
Posts: 525
|
They live near me and are a really nice family. Who cares how many kids they have, it's not like they don't work and claim benefits like some with loads of children. Noel gets early to open his bakery and still takes the younger children to school before going back to work.
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,403
|
I didn't know they had kids which is just as well really because they're an odd looking couple.
If I had a phobia they'd be the last people I'd use for help. |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 40,639
|
Quote:
I'm sure they are a very nice family but every Christmas it's always the same: "Britain's biggest family (they don't receive any benefits, btw!) has ANOTHER child. You won't BELIEVE how long it takes them to cook Christmas dinner!" No I wouldn't and I also don't bloody care! I'm sure they are a nice family and they come across pleasant and hard working but it's more of the fault of the newspapers and television programmes forcing them down our throats all the time!
Education. Child benefit. NHS health care. Dental treatment. Optical care, e.g. glasses/eye tests. Prescriptions. (The above is probably not a complete list.) All the above are generally free, regardless of family earned income. So, children are a huge burden on the state financially and environmentally in terms of Earth's population. In other words, the more children that they have, the more the general taxpayer will have to pay in taxes. Quote:
They live near me and are a really nice family. Who cares how many kids they have, it's not like they don't work and claim benefits like some with loads of children. Noel gets early to open his bakery and still takes the younger children to school before going back to work.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,987
|
[quote=Union Jock;84901178]I didn't know they had kids which is just as well really because they're an odd looking couple.
If I had a phobia they'd be the last people I'd use for help.[Quote Care to explain your odd comment? |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Back of the shed.
Posts: 14,029
|
Are they claiming every benefit available to them?
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,987
|
Quote:
Are they claiming every benefit available to them?
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,674
|
Quote:
Are they claiming every benefit available to them?
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
|
Quote:
Are they claiming every benefit available to them?
Makes you sick, doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,550
|
I quite like them. It's not like they're having babies to not work. Fair play to them.
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,878
|
Quote:
You won't BELIEVE how long it takes them to cook Christmas dinner!"!
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 40,639
|
Quote:
I quite like them. It's not like they're having babies to not work. Fair play to them.
Quote:
Bloody people claiming things that they're entitled to!
Makes you sick, doesn't it?Quote:
Hope so, they pay into the system so why not.
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,674
|
Quote:
Missing the point here guys. They're claiming or benefiting from what they're entitled to, but they don't need to have so many children in the first place, so are an extra burden on the state, as there are no disincentives really to have fewer children when it comes to state support, i.e. the list I posted above as examples.
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,550
|
I can understand why disincentivising people on benefits to have large families that the state has to pay for and workers typically can't afford.
If the a Radfords want another child they should go for it. |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: dole office.
Posts: 35,074
|
i only opened the thread to see who they were.
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: dole office.
Posts: 35,074
|
Quote:
I expect they keep stopping to have unprotected sex
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
|
Quote:
Missing the point here guys. They're claiming or benefiting from what they're entitled to, but they don't need to have so many children in the first place, so are an extra burden on the state, as there are no disincentives really to have fewer children when it comes to state support, i.e. the list I posted above as examples.
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: By the Skeleton Tree.
Posts: 56,608
|
Quote:
If I had a phobia they'd be the last people I'd use for help.
I mean, that Gordon Ramsey. If I had a weird skin disease he's the last person I'd go to for help. Am I doing it right? |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Albans, UK, Team Wagner
Posts: 42,866
|
Quote:
Not 100% sure, but I think this may be the first time I've ever heard of them, unless I've just forgotten.
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 91
|
I'll join the chorus. Who?
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38.



Makes you sick, doesn't it?
