DS Forums

 
 

Is the west preparing for war with Russia


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17-12-2016, 08:31
Black Sheep
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 13,457
Is this what this surge in anti Russian propaganda is all about? Are they trying to mobilize public support for war with Russia just like the Iraq war? Are people going to fall for it just like the Iraq war?
Not really a winnable war for either side. We both have nuclear weapons after all.
Black Sheep is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 17-12-2016, 08:32
Rae_Amury
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 492
It was looking like this for the months before they started a war with Iraq. They softened the public up for a while and then did it.

I certainly think it looked that way the way that Hillary Clinton was talking. Which was crazy when she was preaching platitudes about tolerance and building the bridges of division.....but at the same time ranting on about Russia.

Now that Trump won we may have dodged that bullet. and I do mean WE. Because with some of the language used by Clinton I think she was taking us towards a terrifying direction. Hopefully relations with Russia will be repaired. But who can say for certain? It may be wishful thinking on my part.
My thoughts too.

For quite some time, and it started before Crimea and Sochi, the media were showing a lot of hostility to Russia. Everything Russia did was somehow criticized and turned into a scandal. From politics to economy and sport. Its when I started to feel that something is changing, that maybe certain decision or direction was taken by the West and its graually intensifying as they are preparing to launch whatever their plan is. Just look now, they are openly accusing Russia from such things as war crimes, genocide and manipulation of elections. All of those enough to be used as reasons to military action against Russia. I too feel like the mainstream media are preparing people for such possibility and manipulating them into supporting their government if they decide to proceed with whatever they have planned, and I do think it can be a war against Russia. Im not really someone who buys into conspiracy theories, and this certainly sound like one, but this time, I just cant help and feel scared.
Rae_Amury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 10:06
Blairdennon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,746
Assassinating people on UK territory and interfering in elections is hardly the sign of someone who wants to be your friend. Besides, being friendly towards people like Putin has never worked in the past. They just see it as weakness and take advantage of it.
Putin is not the Russian people just as those who murder British citizens on British soil are not the sole representatives of Islam. Those who will die in any possible conflict will most decidedly not be either Putin or those who are the most belligerent in the West. Friendship is something that depends on two sides and the actions of the EU in the Ukraine were hardly the actions of a friend to Russia.
Blairdennon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 13:08
Lyricalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
Putin is not the Russian people just as those who murder British citizens on British soil are not the sole representatives of Islam. Those who will die in any possible conflict will most decidedly not be either Putin or those who are the most belligerent in the West. Friendship is something that depends on two sides and the actions of the EU in the Ukraine were hardly the actions of a friend to Russia.
Having a united position against Putin shows strength. It'll mean less chance of conflict rather than more. The alternative is letting him carry on weakening ourselves and our allies until he thinks we're in a position where he can do whatever he likes. We just need to hold him off until either his own people get sick of him or he gets sick himself. After all, no one lives forever.
Lyricalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 13:18
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
Syria in general should raise questions. Western coalition flew lots of sorties & expended millions in bombs & missiles.. And achieved what, exactly? Much was said about our War on Terror, yet Russia seems to have achieved far more, in far less time with only a few dozen planes and hundreds of troops. And it being Xmas, no doubt that will translate into healthy order books for Russian arms exports.
That's true. This war was pretty unique in that most of the news we could get out of that area was second-hand or hearsay, with only the word of people who may not know the full extent of the truth.
Usually there are embedded journalists inside a warzone, and even then that isn't completely unreliable. But here we got practically nothing. Mainly just what we are told by partisan entities.

On the news it showed buildings destroyed, rubble and dust, and we are told 'Russians and Assad done it'. I find that to be quite a stretch because to accept that you would have to imagine that America and its allies did absolutely nothing at all there whatsoever. Or their bombs and bullets were magic and had censors on them which avoided civilians and civilian inhabited buildings.

And if we are to accept that Russia and Assad are completely responsible for the carnage, how do we square that with the other recent news where we are supposed to just accept that civilians will die because they will be unable to escape in the operation for the battle for Mosul in Iraq where allied militias in the areas who we are supposed to support are involved? We're just expected to suck it up as though it's inevitable and there's nothing we can do about it.
Alrightmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 13:28
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
Didn't you realise that all this warm weather we have been having recently is down to the Russians hacking the atmosphere and shifting the jet stream?

You have to laugh at that Labour MP, was it Ben Bradshaw, who thinks that Russia 'hacked' Brexit.
How does that work then? How do you hack something which isn't a computer system?
Alrightmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 13:32
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
Why can't we reach out in to russian and see if they take it as friendship or slap it away, I don't know why we must be rivals
I share your feelings. Unfortunately it seems to be the case that most leaders of powerful counties see geopolitics like one of those computer games where they employ strategies to gain the balance of power in the world, and literally play things out like it's a computer game.

I see no reason why we can't try to cooperate with Russia and try to develop a warmer relationship. I don't mean in a sentimental gooey way, I mean just treat them as we would treat any country who we are on respectful terms with.
If they keep poking the bear with a stick then what sort of response do they realistically expect? It can only go one way the more hostile and provocative they are.
Russia themselves have a reason to be paranoid what with the various NATO bases being built around them and China like a pincher.
If a Western country was surrounded by military bases of a foreign force how do people think that country would feel? One example would be the Cuban missile crisis where the boot was on the other foot and America weren't exactly what you'd call very happy about it.
Alrightmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:03
daveyfs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Swansea
Posts: 871
Is this what this surge in anti Russian propaganda is all about? Are they trying to mobilize public support for war with Russia just like the Iraq war? Are people going to fall for it just like the Iraq war?
I really believe the western political and business establishment has been gunning for Russia for a while and was building up to triggering a conflict under the anticipated Hillary Clinton presidency. Trump being elected has thrown a spanner in the works hence all the anti-Russia hysteria and propaganda at the moment.

I don't like Trump at all, but I do feel we've dodged a bullet with him being elected.
daveyfs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:06
johnny_boi_UK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
Assassinating people on UK territory and interfering in elections is hardly the sign of someone who wants to be your friend. Besides, being friendly towards people like Putin has never worked in the past. They just see it as weakness and take advantage of it.
I was wondering who you were talking about untill you mentioned putin...

You do know that the usa has interfered in elections?
johnny_boi_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:08
Mr Oleo Strut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,311
The UK is not in a position to wage war on anybody significant. We have more gold-braided buffoons than fighting Typhoons and the same applies across the rest of the military. We certainly do have fine troops, but they are still lions led by donkeys and dodgy politicians.
Mr Oleo Strut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:12
johnny_boi_UK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
I share your feelings. Unfortunately it seems to be the case that most leaders of powerful counties see geopolitics like one of those computer games where they employ strategies to gain the balance of power in the world, and literally play things out like it's a computer game.

I see no reason why we can't try to cooperate with Russia and try to develop a warmer relationship. I don't mean in a sentimental gooey way, I mean just treat them as we would treat any country who we are on respectful terms with.
If they keep poking the bear with a stick then what sort of response do they realistically expect? It can only go one way the more hostile and provocative they are.
Russia themselves have a reason to be paranoid what with the various NATO bases being built around them and China like a pincher.
If a Western country was surrounded by military bases of a foreign force how do people think that country would feel? One example would be the Cuban missile crisis where the boot was on the other foot and America weren't exactly what you'd call very happy about it.
Exactly, I was wondering what America would do if russia began to deploy a missle defence shield in say Cuba or deployed troops in Mexico as a "trip wire".
johnny_boi_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:15
johnny_boi_UK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,045
The UK is not in a position to wage war on anybody significant. We have more gold-braided buffoons than fighting Typhoons and the same applies across the rest of the military. We certainly do have fine troops, but they are still lions led by donkeys and dodgy politicians.
Yep, Whitehall should have been gutted when we discovered what Geoff hook was up to. I'm actually surprised that their was no inquiry.
johnny_boi_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:16
John146
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 8,259
Exactly, I was wondering what America would do if russia began to deploy a missle defence shield in say Cuba or deployed troops in Mexico as a "trip wire".
Possibly the same thing that America did last time, have a face off until one side or the other backs down
John146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 14:59
spiney2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,092
The idea that the west was ''preparing to take on russia'', if true, was completely insane. If Trump saves us from that, we should forgive all his faults.
spiney2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 17:33
The Backbencher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 527
Only in the world of the Moscow propaganda machine.

in the real world, Putin has invaded two neighbouring countries since 2008, built new bases to threaten Finland and Japan , threatened Finland and the Baltic states with reoccupation, and Denmark with nuclear attack, buzzed NATO warships, flown bombers on attack profiles against NATO partners- from Portugal to Canada - as well as against Japan and Sweden, and repeatedly violated Swedish, and Baltic states airspace.

He's also added 3 new divisions to his forces on NATO's borders- with about 600 extra tanks - more than the UK, France and Germany field in total. He's put longer ranged nuclear missiles into Kaliningrad - of a type NATO hasn't had since the early 90s. And he's aggressively developing longer range Iskanders, and nuclear cruise missiles, which will break the INF treaty , when deployed.

Nato so far has put about another 5000 troops, and 40 tanks, forward into the Baltic states - so there's a tripwire there to deter any invasion. its hardly enough to advance on Moscow .

Its also hardly a NATO response. Sweden and Finland are both also increasing their defence capability and budgets - Finland announced its increasing its mobilised army strength by another 50,000 this week.

Russian aggression has sparked off alarm and increasing defence budgets now in all its European neighbours , and Japan. They are now reaping what they sowed , with small US forces deployed on their border, small NATO units deployed on their invasion routes into Poland and the Baltics, and the neutral states and Poland devising additional deterrent means, to deter any invasion or attack. If they do break the post Cold War nuclear treaties, there's going to have to be a counter to those weapons redeployed too.

of course, if the Russians got out of the Ukraine and Georgia , took their nuclear missiles back, stopped flying in other people's airspace, stopped talking about invading more neighbours, and stopped doubling their tank forces , things might revert back to something more normal.
I'm of the opinion that Putin is a posturing, macho bully. I'm also of the opinion that NATO and leading western countries badly need the perpetual 'stand off' with Russia as it a) justifies NATO's existence and expansion and b) arms trading is hugely lucrative and increasingly important to western economies.

In other words, there are NO GOOD GUYS in the Russia v The West power game and little moral authority for either side to claim. Unfortunately the west has useful idiots like you who continue to believe the Russia bad/west good propaganda that is spoon fed to us constantly from supposedly neutral sources.
The Backbencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 18:31
mal2pool
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,499
russia is doing its best to be an enemy to everybody,

russia messed with us election.....response...no we didnt
russia doped their athletes...response..no we didnt
russia invaded ukraine...no we didnt

anything they did they dont admit to it...like a spoiled brat.
mal2pool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 19:56
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
Problem is, who do we believe?
The Americans claim cyber hacking on the election, Russia says no.


Russia also has a feather up its.....well u know, about the roll out of US missile shield thru much of Europe.

I also think that the Russian involvement in Syria is also because they have a major base there.....also Syria is traditionally a friend of Russia.

So, Russia is back on the world stage, big time, and we are going to have to deal with that, reach a compromise etc, because if we don't it will surely end in a conflict.
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 20:14
Lyricalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
I was wondering who you were talking about untill you mentioned putin...

You do know that the usa has interfered in elections?
No I don't know that the US has interfered in UK elections or that it has assassinated people in the UK.
Lyricalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 20:16
Blairdennon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,746
Having a united position against Putin shows strength. It'll mean less chance of conflict rent ather than more. The alternative is letting him carry on weakening ourselves and our allies until he thinks we're in a position where he can do whatever he likes. We just need to hold him off until either his own people get sick of him or he gets sick himself. After all, no one lives forever.
A strong position is always easy for those who do not have to implement it on the ground. A negotiating position is better as we are always being told. Strong positions require levels of bluff that may be called. I do not think for a minute he wants to do whatever he wishes but he will defend Russia which one cannot criticise him for. I am not sure the Ukraine cutting off the Crimean water supply is the way forward. I am sure if Putin did something like that we would be apoplectic with rage.
Blairdennon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 20:20
Blairdennon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,746
No I don't know that the US has interfered in UK elections or that it has assassinated people in the UK.
I thought Obama and quite a number of serving US politicians did interfere in our referendum by siding with one viewpoint and participating in threats against a particular outcome.
Blairdennon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 20:41
The Backbencher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 527
t
No I don't know that the US has interfered in UK elections or that it has assassinated people in the UK.
America has either invaded, subverted democracy, bombed, overthrown directly, or via subterfuge, governments in numerous sovereign countries since 1945.

Its record in interfering in the affairs of other nations is unsurpassed and Britain has of course plenty of form in this unseemly business too.

As I've already written I dislike and distrust Putin, but Britain and the US have very little moral high ground on which to stand when criticising alleged Russian interference in domestic affairs.

Frankly, the faux outrage is laughable.
The Backbencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 21:00
Lyricalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
I thought Obama and quite a number of serving US politicians did interfere in our referendum by siding with one viewpoint and participating in threats against a particular outcome.
You mean they pointed out how stupid leaving the EU was? I think pretty much everyone outside the UK agreed with them on that. Frankly, it'll go down as one of the stupidest decisions any major country has made in recent history.
Lyricalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 21:08
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
So, US retaliatory cyber options for alleged Russian interefernece in election......banks, multiple banks, maybe Russian ISPs - if u knock those out you stop all internet activity.....maybe something bigger, power grid.......
So the question is how far can the US push this before Russia responds like for like.....or worse, steps it up a notch or two. And if they were successful would the US respond to that?

How far does it have to crank up before an actual kinetic conflict breaks out?
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 21:09
David (2)
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
You mean they pointed out how stupid leaving the EU was? I think pretty much everyone outside the UK agreed with them on that. Frankly, it'll go down as one of the stupidest decisions any major country has made in recent history.

Yes, exactly.
Usually, interference in matters such as this are done behind closed downs.....not by the president expressing a view on national tv news.
David (2) is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-12-2016, 01:53
ricksb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
russia is doing its best to be an enemy to everybody,

russia messed with us election.....response...no we didnt
russia doped their athletes...response..no we didnt
russia invaded ukraine...no we didnt

anything they did they dont admit to it...like a spoiled brat.
Maybe thats because there isnt any 100% proof that Russia messed with an election.
ricksb is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:22.