• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
HMP Birmingham riot
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
andydylan
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“a large number of my friends and a couple of exes are or have been in prison, you don`t know what you are talking about.

indeed, my father has several items that prisoners have made for him, in common with a lot of other officers.”

Are they in prison for showing to much respect or for criminal activies, ie, not showing any respect?
annette kurten
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by andydylan:
“Are they in prison for showing to much respect or for criminal activies, ie, not showing any respect?”

that`s nothing to do with this exchange, besides which the officers are not there because they have committed a crime.
Resonance
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by Jenny_Sawyer:
“Prison officers are over-worked & under-paid - needs addressing. All the prisoners involved in this riot should have 5 years added to their sentences - possibly with 'hard labour' if that can be organised. Prison visits should be stopped - no seeing family/friends (how else can all these drugs & other contraband be getting in to prisons....?)”

Problem with stopping visits is that you'd be punishing their friends and family.

No doubt they'll be getting extra time.
annette kurten
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by annette kurten:
“the stanford prison experiment is a very good illustration of the dynamics.

as a side note, when i googled for a link i noticed they`ve made a movie of it .”

i`ve just watched this.

i`m pretty familiar with the experiment on paper, seeing it in film form is extremely powerful and deeply, deeply disturbing.

i have no way of knowing how accurate they have the characters but zimbardo was completely sucked into his own experiment.

everyone who is in favour of a harsh and brutal regime in prison should watch this.

edit: and those who aren`t, it`s a really good film.
SULLA
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by Resonance:
“Problem with stopping visits is that you'd be punishing their friends and family.”

Keeping them away from the influence of Crims should not be seen as a punishment
tim59
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Keeping them away from the influence of Crims should not be seen as a punishment”

But who is to say that friends and family were the influence of a person committing a crimes.
muggins14
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Keeping them away from the influence of Crims should not be seen as a punishment”

Not every criminal is a serial killer or rapist - there are people who commit a crime, do their time and then move on with their lives, never committing a crime again - which is what the system is meant to be achieving.

The riot last week happened in a Category B prison, where people on remand (not yet convicted) would also be held (according to Google ). " The majority of prisoners on remand have not been convicted of a criminal offence and are awaiting trial following a not guilty plea" http://www.offendersfamilieshelpline...-into-custody/
Resonance
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Keeping them away from the influence of Crims should not be seen as a punishment”

Well if it was a member of your family I'm sure it would be. You see just because a member of someone's family commits a crime, it doesn't mean they stop loving them.

You don't seem a very caring human being tbh.
SULLA
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by Resonance:
“Well if it was a member of your family I'm sure it would be.”

Charming
Quote:
“ You see just because a member of someone's family commits a crime, it doesn't mean they stop loving them.”

You can love someone without visting them.
Quote:
“You don't seem a very caring human being tbh.”

This thread is not about me
SULLA
18-12-2016
Excellent post deleted due to duplication
Resonance
18-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Charming ”

Just saying if a member of your family was locked up you'd likely see not being able to visit them as a punishment.

Originally Posted by SULLA:
“You can love someone without visting them.”

You can, but it's kind of, you know nice to see the people you love. Strange concept I know.

Originally Posted by SULLA:
“This thread is not about me”

Maybe not, but aren't you our resident Christian? Thought you'd be all about kindness, compassion, forgiveness etc?
Chihiro77
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Hackettboy:
“Too many drugs and steroids and phones and play stations it's a jail not a holiday camp ,they kicked off cus the telly was broke ,shame what about the people they have hurt or robbed ,too many do gooders plus deport any non U.K. Criminals why should we have to pay to keep them they should be on the next plane home”

You see wanting to do good as a bad thing? Says a lot about you...
anais32
19-12-2016
The idea of stopping visits goes to show how stupid and counterproductive the 'hang em' lot are. It doesn't matter about reducing crime or making society safer. All they care about is punishing people - even if they are innocent (the families/children of prisoners).

Every study shows there are only three things which prevent re-offending - secure home, family ties, gainful employment. Stopping family visits would have a serious deleterious effect on the second one.

And it's another indication of the stupid and the ignorant that every time there is a debate on prisoners; people think of murderers, violent thugs and sex offenders. In fact violence and sex offences account for 40% of male prisoners. 60% are in prison for non violent crimes. And of that 40%, some will have not even involved actual violence but the potential/threat (such as possession of a weapon).
mark23
19-12-2016
I've been in prison and in Young Offenders before that. Despite what people think it is not a holiday camp and it is tough being there missing your normal life and friends and family. It's not easy but overall there is less violence and fights than people think. Think of having maybe 1000 youngish lads in the same place with not much to do and what would happen. The only reason why there isn't more riots is that the prison officers have to deal with prisoners in a humane way and give privileges to keep control of things. There are different regimes and the fact that you want to keep your privileges keeps things in control mostly. There are many more prisoners than officers so things could kick off any time. The fact that these new drugs are getting in and that it is Christmas and most lads are going to be away from their families doesn't help.

I saw enough fights but never any riots or anything like that. But if something kicked off and everybody was getting involved I don't know if I wouldn't have too.

Originally Posted by anais32:
“Actually most would love this. (Prisoners aren't paid minimum wage anyway, they are paid around £5 per week if you are fully employed in the prison). That's £5 extra they get to spend on things like phonecards, coffee, ciggies and the £1 per week it costs to 'rent' a TV.

Some trusted prisoners are given better jobs and paid more. (And by more I mean about £2 extra per week) but it's not the money they want jobs for. A prison job will mean more time out of cell. A full time prison job can mean you are out of your cell 9 am - 12 pm and 2 pm to 4.30 pm. But they are pretty much a rarity and reserved for trusted lifers (if the are in the prison) or other long-termers. The cherished ones are things like library orderly, education orderly. But these positions require a certain level of intelligence and, frankly, most prisoners are not really up to it. They are also highly trusted positions (library and education staff are not prison officers so there has to be no issues around safety - they need to be able to be left alone with non officer staff and trusted).

The problem is, there simply are not enough jobs to go around. There's a huge waiting list for most prison jobs and by the time a prisoner finds himself at the top of it, he's (it's usually 'he') is often shipped out to another prison and has to start the application process all over again. There are also some stupid rules. You have to have entry level 2 in literacy to get any prison job (even working in the laundry). Given the poor reading skills of most prisoners, this is a pointless rule. It's designed to encourage people to learn to read but guess what? They don't have the literacy skills to even get into a classroom.

Result - probably 60% are banged up in their cell doing FA for 23 hours a day. That's what our taxpayers money is going on. 30% probably have a part-time job which allows them out of their cell for a morning or afternoon session. I'd say only around 10% are properly employed full time within the prison.”

That's exactly right. In Young Offenders I had to do courses and that kept me busy. In prison you can do courses as well. But as you said it is very hard to get work. The long timers get all the best jobs like being in the kitchen, gardening. You might get a job likebeing a wing cleaner - I did - and it was good to get time out of the cell but it was a shitty job. I still preferred being out of my cell as much as possible. I got paid a bit extra - not much but it gives you something to do. You end up working for maybe 30p an hour or something like that.

Originally Posted by speigel:
“put them on bread and water, turn off the heating, ban all tv/radios etc. thorough search and remove all weapons and drugs. And NO smoking!”

Yeah that will really do good. If we didn't have TV and radios and were still in a cell for 23 hours (like at the weekend) there would be much more trouble. Any officer would tell you that TVs are thebest helpthey have in doing their job.

And 90% of prisoners smoke. If tey banned that there really would be riots. I gave up smoking for a while but when I got back to prison I started again. It's one thing that helps with the boredom.

Originally Posted by Resonance:
“They are. When you first go in you don't get them. You're on a basic regime. If you behave you receive some privileges, do something wrong and they are removed. The whole point of giving prisoners TV's etc is to get them to behave. Carrot and stick.”

Yeah that's exactly how it works. You go in on standard regime and then you can get improved to enhanced and super enhanced with more privileges. You can get busted down to basic - lose TV and some visits - nobody wants that to happen to them.

Originally Posted by Galaxy266:
“They should house them in tents inside a 15ft perimeter fence, patrolled by armed guards.

When they are sitting in the tents freezing cold due to the lack of heating then perhaps they'll think twice before smashing up a prison ever again.”

They tried that somewhere in America but that Sherriff got thrown out of office and now they are having to close it down. That's the one with chain gangs and pink underwear as well. Crazy guy!

Originally Posted by andydylan:
“Whats your point ? Back then it was an "us and them" thing. Prisoners loathed officers. In the 60s-70s officers were known to give a disruptive prisoner a kicking, no denying that at all.No prison riots either. I am not saying that todays prison officers should hand out a kicking but the prisoners have it way to easy. They have zero respect for the prison officers.”

Some officers are sound enough - fair and some are pretty strict but want to help you. There are lazy b*****ds and some on a power trip. There are all different sorts.

Originally Posted by Jenny_Sawyer:
“Prison officers are over-worked & under-paid - needs addressing. All the prisoners involved in this riot should have 5 years added to their sentences - possibly with 'hard labour' if that can be organised. Prison visits should be stopped - no seeing family/friends (how else can all these drugs & other contraband be getting in to prisons....?)”

Prison visits are real inportant. You have no idea how much it means to get a visit and get out of your mind where you are for that hour. People get worse when they don't get visits. For me having my family stay in touch with me meant alot and they also helped me get back to normal when I got out of prison. Pushing families away doesn't make any sense if you want to keep people from going back to prison
Chihiro77
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by mark23:
“I've been in prison and in Young Offenders before that. Despite what people think it is not a holiday camp and it is tough being there missing your normal life and friends and family. It's not easy but overall there is less violence and fights than people think. Think of having maybe 1000 youngish lads in the same place with not much to do and what would happen. The only reason why there isn't more riots is that the prison officers have to deal with prisoners in a humane way and give privileges to keep control of things. There are different regimes and the fact that you want to keep your privileges keeps things in control mostly. There are many more prisoners than officers so things could kick off any time. The fact that these new drugs are getting in and that it is Christmas and most lads are going to be away from their families doesn't help.

I saw enough fights but never any riots or anything like that. But if something kicked off and everybody was getting involved I don't know if I wouldn't have too.



That's exactly right. In Young Offenders I had to do courses and that kept me busy. In prison you can do courses as well. But as you said it is very hard to get work. The long timers get all the best jobs like being in the kitchen, gardening. You might get a job likebeing a wing cleaner - I did - and it was good to get time out of the cell but it was a shitty job. I still preferred being out of my cell as much as possible. I got paid a bit extra - not much but it gives you something to do. You end up working for maybe 30p an hour or something like that.



Yeah that will really do good. If we didn't have TV and radios and were still in a cell for 23 hours (like at the weekend) there would be much more trouble. Any officer would tell you that TVs are thebest helpthey have in doing their job.

And 90% of prisoners smoke. If tey banned that there really would be riots. I gave up smoking for a while but when I got back to prison I started again. It's one thing that helps with the boredom.



Yeah that's exactly how it works. You go in on standard regime and then you can get improved to enhanced and super enhanced with more privileges. You can get busted down to basic - lose TV and some visits - nobody wants that to happen to them.



They tried that somewhere in America but that Sherriff got thrown out of office and now they are having to close it down. That's the one with chain gangs and pink underwear as well. Crazy guy!



Some officers are sound enough - fair and some are pretty strict but want to help you. There are lazy b*****ds and some on a power trip. There are all different sorts.



Prison visits are real inportant. You have no idea how much it means to get a visit and get out of your mind where you are for that hour. People get worse when they don't get visits. For me having my family stay in touch with me meant alot and they also helped me get back to normal when I got out of prison. Pushing families away doesn't make any sense if you want to keep people from going back to prison”

Interesting post, thanks.
anais32
19-12-2016
The point about TVs is a good one. People don't seem to realise, they were put into prisons for the benefit of prison officers, not prisoners. They allowed for longer bang-up times, fewer staff and reduced activity in the prison. And when TVs were put in cells, the suicide rate dropped.
SULLA
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by Resonance:
“ Just saying if a member of your family was locked up you'd likely see not being able to visit them as a punishment.”

Yes I would. For them, not for me.

Quote:
“You can, but it's kind of, you know nice to see the people you love. Strange concept I know.”

It's something that criminals should consider.

Quote:
“Maybe not, but aren't you our resident Christian? Thought you'd be all about kindness, compassion, forgiveness etc?”

I am.
Chihiro77
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Yes I would. For them, not for me.

It's something that criminals should consider.

I am. ”

Not all of them are able to.
anais32
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Yes I would. For them, not for me.

It's something that criminals should consider.

I am. ”

What a crock of ****. You are about as Christian as an Ayatollah's fart.
Sun Glasses Ron
19-12-2016
I have a family member who has worked for the prison service for over 20 years
The prison is now run by G4S
There are many incidents that take place (between staff & prisoners)
However if they are resolved between the 2 parties (of which it is encouraged)
The incident is not 'officially' reported
If it was, it would be picked up by the HMP Inspectors & questions would be asked
So incidents are not logged & looks like the company running the prison are doing well

Plus most of the staff are of a young age & many prisoners take advantage of this
Illegal highs are often smuggled into the prison as its not picked up by drugs testing
The use of mobile phones is rife too
The lack of staff especially the more experience ones will most likely mean there will be more of these riots

Maybe with the exception of the most dangerous offenders we should look at alternative methods??

Work 12 hours a day
Doing full term of punishment
Making the offender replaying the debt in a worthwhile manner
There are enough things that need doing in the UK that we are told cant be done due to lack of resources
Why should the tax payer pay millions of pounds for people to mess around/use gyms/watch TV etc
Or as an alternative to prison hand them over to the armed forces to deal with
Teach them respect to others themselves & society in general
Would imagine some people commit crime to get food water & a bed as it gives them the stability they crave for
Resonance
19-12-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Yes I would. For them, not for me.

It's something that criminals should consider.

I am. ”

If not being able to see a family member isn't a punishment then you can't think much of them.
anais32
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by Sun Glasses Ron:
“I have a family member who has worked for the prison service for over 20 years
The prison is now run by G4S
There are many incidents that take place (between staff & prisoners)
However if they are resolved between the 2 parties (of which it is encouraged)
The incident is not 'officially' reported
If it was, it would be picked up by the HMP Inspectors & questions would be asked
So incidents are not logged & looks like the company running the prison are doing well

Plus most of the staff are of a young age & many prisoners take advantage of this
Illegal highs are often smuggled into the prison as its not picked up by drugs testing
The use of mobile phones is rife too
The lack of staff especially the more experience ones will most likely mean there will be more of these riots

Maybe with the exception of the most dangerous offenders we should look at alternative methods??

Work 12 hours a day
Doing full term of punishment
Making the offender replaying the debt in a worthwhile manner
There are enough things that need doing in the UK that we are told cant be done due to lack of resources
Why should the tax payer pay millions of pounds for people to mess around/use gyms/watch TV etc
Or as an alternative to prison hand them over to the armed forces to deal with
Teach them respect to others themselves & society in general
Would imagine some people commit crime to get food water & a bed as it gives them the stability they crave for”

It's bent prison officers responsible for smuggling most of the drugs/phones in. Drones can only be successfully smuggled into relatively low secure settings.

But for the rest of your post - yes, I agree. We need to be more imaginative.

If the offender is unemployed; and if s/he is not guilty of a violent offence and poses little public protection risk; then there's a whole tonne of buildings that could do with being reclaimed. Make them work a full day (even on minimum wage; that's considerably cheaper than banging them up). That instils discipline; the routine of getting up and preparing yourself for work; some legitimately acquired income; and experience and skills for the workplace.

If the offender is employed; then taking him out of employment to lock him up is utterly counterproductive. There needs to be a much greater use of curfews and tags. Some countries have 'weekend only prisons' where the offender works as usual during the week (but on curfew and tag in evenings) and then has to be banged up Friday evening, Saturday and Sunday.
Somner
20-12-2016
Some of the opinions and ideas on this thread are ridiculous, laughable, and disgusting. The nature of my job means that I have plenty of contact with criminals, and usually at the times when they're showing the worst they have to offer to society. I see the complete pain and anguish they cause to others, often completely innocent people. In spite of all this I am 100% supportive of prison being used to rehabilitate people. If prisoners are treated like animals, then they will come out far worse than when they went inside. It's worth baring in mind that many prisoners will be inside for non violent crimes such as shoplifting and other thefts.

My experience has shown me that there are two things that help to prevent people from committing crime; a steady family life with somewhere to live, and steady employment. Family ties need to be allowed to remain whilst people are in prison, and skills should be taught to help prisoners secure employment upon release.

anais32 and I often disagree on all manner of things when it comes to law and order, but this time she's right.
annette kurten
20-12-2016
Originally Posted by Somner:
“Some of the opinions and ideas on this thread are ridiculous, laughable, and disgusting. The nature of my job means that I have plenty of contact with criminals, and usually at the times when they're showing the worst they have to offer to society. I see the complete pain and anguish they cause to others, often completely innocent people. In spite of all this I am 100% supportive of prison being used to rehabilitate people. If prisoners are treated like animals, then they will come out far worse than when they went inside. It's worth baring in mind that many prisoners will be inside for non violent crimes such as shoplifting and other thefts.

anais32 and I often disagree on all manner of things when it comes to law and order, but this time she's right.”

they should watch the stanford experiment - though it might relative porn to some - it`s a shame they couldn`t experience it too, from both roles.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map