Originally Posted by Hoofmatic:
“The problem I have with these fix claims is who gains? Why would the judges or the producers care if Louise or Claudia is in the final? Judging is by definition subjective and if it differs from your opinion it doesn't mean there's a fix. Personally I thought it was a toss up between the two who most deserved to be in the final, but that both Danny and Ore were clearly more deserving, but that's only my opinion and if it had turned out differently I wouldn't have thought for a moment that it was a fix, simply that others had a different opinion, to which they are perfectly entitled.”
You are absolutely right, but I'm afraid logic and factual accuracy don't cut much ice in here....
Originally Posted by PoppySeed:
“Why do people always bore on about fixes, the winner of Strictly really doesn't matter to the producers in the long run, what difference would it make to them which one of the three win. I was probably typical of a lot of viewers yesterday who began the show thinking Danny would win but ended up voting for Ore because he actually delivered best on the night.”
Well y'see, the Beeb always have to engineer it so one of their own employees wins (except, oops, Chris Hollins was the only other one to win, about 10 years ago...)
And then of course, there's a whole department at the Beeb dedicated to getting Kevin a glitterball (but they obviously all had this week off....)
It's all hilarious really.