Following the debacle that Louise and Kevin were given their joint lowest-scoring and most exposing dance as their "Judges Choice", whilst the boys were both handed gifts, here are my suggestions for "balancing up" the choice to make it a whole lot fairer:
1) The Judges choose a particular 'Week' of dancing
They could choose, for example, a week when the three finalists topped the leader board (or jointly topped). This would eliminate all bias as to length of time since those routines were last danced.
All that guff to Louise tonight that we want to see 'if you can improve your score' is pointless as tonight's scores are about as useful a punctured air balloon. What I am saying is, so what if you choose their highest-scoring dances? Isn't it all about achievement? That being the case, allow them to celebrate their success.
2) The Judges choose dances which achieved the same score
I know all scoring is subjective but, once given, its given. Suspending all the 'technicalities', the perception is, the dances are 'equal' and are, therefore, fair game to be compared.
Opinions?
What suggestions do you have for improving the "Judges Choice"
1) The Judges choose a particular 'Week' of dancing
They could choose, for example, a week when the three finalists topped the leader board (or jointly topped). This would eliminate all bias as to length of time since those routines were last danced.
All that guff to Louise tonight that we want to see 'if you can improve your score' is pointless as tonight's scores are about as useful a punctured air balloon. What I am saying is, so what if you choose their highest-scoring dances? Isn't it all about achievement? That being the case, allow them to celebrate their success.
2) The Judges choose dances which achieved the same score
I know all scoring is subjective but, once given, its given. Suspending all the 'technicalities', the perception is, the dances are 'equal' and are, therefore, fair game to be compared.
Opinions?
What suggestions do you have for improving the "Judges Choice"