If someone had committed a terrorist act I wouldn't hang around regardless of colour just in case the attack was just part 1

Yes, but have the police confirmed it yet?

Last I read they were uncertain.

What, you are waiting for the police to say: "Look, guys, really sorry, but we got the wrong guy, the real terrorist is still at large, stay at home and don't go anywhere."?

For sure, but if the guy they have in custody is not the attacker, it means the real culprit could be anyone, including a homegrown terrorist.

The alternative is to report nothing which leads to rumours of cover-ups and conspiracies. Can't win either way.

Yes, a link to a factual (not speculative or guesswork) source would be helpful.

As opposed to people guessing on a forum.

all those who wanted links to not in my name muslims to completely ignore can come back now, it`s on the last page.

I wondered how long it would be before the David Icke Crackpot Conspiracy Theory mob turned up.

Just because someone says it isn't him, doesn't mean they didn't do it.

If a witness claims to have followed someone from the scene, and points him out to the police what do you expect them to do?

It's looking increasingly likely

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/be...-a7486561.html

It's always the same annette, don't expect any acknowledgement.

Judaism historically was proselytizing including engaging in conversion by coercion of people living in conquered territory, convert or leave or die.

Hinduism is historically a proselytizing religion and is currently proselytizing for example the Hare Krishna movement. It also currently converts through coercion Christians and Muslims in parts of India through the use of violence including killings.

Buddhism is historically a proselytizing religion using monks and missionaries and currently people are converting in the West. It also currently converts through coercion Christians and Muslims in Burma through the use of violence including killings.

Sikhism forbids proselytizing. There are however Sikh terrorist organizations attempting to make Sikh states, they kill non-believers.

Unfortunately most Muslims around the world hold views on adultery, blasphemy, homosexuality and apostasy which normal people in the West would find totally abhorrent.

I read the links with interest thanks

people asked for link on muslims protesting about isis, those are links about muslims protesting about isis.

my pleasure.

Trucks weren't being used as a weapon of choice then so why would someone get the idea that the bin lorry was being used for that purpose.

Proof of the claim would help though.

Muslims protesting against ISIS won't do anything

You honestly think that will make ISIS stop? Also even if they are protests...the media won't even pick it up.

Thanks for that

Bad news if he is still on the run, and sad for the Polish 'original' driver, who seems to have been shot and stabbed prior to the attack equally worrying is that no gun has yet been found.

I'd just like to say: crisis actor, Mossad, video clearly a fake, CIA, shooting acoustics don't match the reaction, perp wearing the wrong shirt for Turkish police, false flag, KGB, Obama, Putin. Oh, and buy my latest book now.

The Ottoman empire is not the source of the English word slave.
The Ottoman empire was founded at the end of the 13th century and conquered the Byzantine empire in 1453.

The Slav people mitigated into the Balklands from the 6th century, the Greek Byzantine empire engaged in many wars with the Slavs. The Byzantines borrowed and adapted the Slavs' own name as sklavos (σκλάβος). It became the Greek name for the Slavs, and due to large numbers taken captive an alternative word for "slave" doulos (δούλος). The word was adopted in to Latin in the 10th century. Medieval Latin modified it to sclavus and used it in the two senses that developed in Byzantium, "Slav" and "slave." In turn, became the source of the Modern English word slave.

ISIS have killed more Muslims than westerners, that's for sure.

And of course, rather a lot of Syrian troops are currently fighting them, which I'd say is a fairly clear opposition to their ideology.

The KKK false equivalence is a particularly amusing one since their leader Thomas Robb is a church pastor - by this logic, that makes all Christians KKK supporters by default.

He's probably still got the gun. What reason would there be to get rid of it.

None at all, especially if he wants to strike again.

I didn't think that was so much a conspiracy theory as a suggestion that someone saw someone else leaving the scene and jumped to conclusions. That might indeed be the case - or it might be that what the witness thought he saw was indeed what he really did see. Who (on this thread) really knows for sure?